Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Community-based enterprises: The significance of partnerships and institutional linkages Cover

Community-based enterprises: The significance of partnerships and institutional linkages

Open Access
|Oct 2009

Figures & Tables

figures/ijc2009-200919-001.jpg
Figure 1

Institutional linkages Pred Nai Community Forest Group, Thailand (Adapted from Senyk 2006).

figures/ijc2009-200919-002.jpg
Figure 2

Institutional linkages leading to the development of the Arapaima Management Project, Guyana. Iwokrama is a national NGO; North Rupununi District Development Board (NRDDB) is a Regional Indigenous Organization; Mamirauá is a Brazilian NGO and also the name of a Protected Area (Fernandes 2005).

figures/ijc2009-200919-003.jpg
Figure 3

Evolution of community-based conservation in Namibia (Hoole 2007, Hoole this issue).

figures/ijc2009-200919-004.jpg
Figure 4

Institutional interactions among stakeholders of the Casa Matsiguenka Community-based Ecotourism Lodge Enterprise: (a) during development and implementation of the project (1996–2003); (b) in 2005 (Herrera 2006).

figures/ijc2009-200919-005.jpg
Figure 5

Toledo Institute for Development and Environment (TIDE), Belize. Key institutional linkages that facilitated the creation of Port Honduras Marine Reserve (PHMR) and associated livelihood projects (Fernandes 2005).

figures/ijc2009-200919-006.jpg
Figure 6

Honey Care Africa initiative in Kwale District, Kenya: Institutional interactions among stakeholders (Maurice 2004).

figures/ijc2009-200919-007.jpg
Figure 7

Institutional linkages which enabled the Cooperative to obtain Health Certification from the Federal Inspection Service (SIF) for its oysters, Brazil (Medeiros 2004).

figures/ijc2009-200919-008.jpg
Figure 8

Rural Communes’ Medicinal Plant Conservation Center, Pune, India: enabling institutional linkages which helped achieve project goals (Shukla 2004).

figures/ijc2009-200919-009.jpg
Figure 9

Pastoralist Integrated Supporting Programme (PISP), Kenya: (a) Some of the strongest institutional linkages at the present time; (b) Key linkages at the town of Balesa (Robinson 2008).

figures/ijc2009-200919-010.jpg
Figure 10

Key institutional linkages facilitating the activities of the North Rupununi District Development Board (NRDDB), in Guyana (Fernandes 2004).

Table 1

Number of partners of each initiative at the time of field research and number of levels of organization in which these partners operate.

CasesPartnersaLevels of organization
Medicinal Plants Conservation Centre, India116
Arapaima conservation, Guyana164
Honey Care Africa Ltd., Kenya – Kakamega85
Honey Care Africa Ltd., Kenya – Kwale65
Cananeia Oyster Producers Co-operative, Brazil144
TIDE Port Honduras marine reserve, Belize134
Pred Nai mangrove rehabilitation, Thailand205
Casa Matsiguenka indigenous ecotourism, Peru73b
Nuevo San Juan forest management, Mexico225
Torra Conservancy, Namibia84
Pastoralist Integrated Support Programme, Kenya175

aThere may be deviations from the number of partners indicated in figures and these numbers, but these are based on the best estimates of the researchers regarding the major partners.

bThere was an international NGO level until 2003.

Table 2

Cross-level representation of stakeholders in Kakamega Honey Care Africa project, Kenya (Maurice 2004).

figures/ijc2009-200919-011.jpg
{ label needed for table-wrap[@id='tb003'] }
List of acronyms
Acronyms in the text
AKFAga Khan Foundation
CBNRMCommunity-based natural resources management
CBOCommunity-based organization
CEDIACentro para el Desarrollo del Indígena Amazónico (Peruvian NGO)
CooperostraCananeia Oyster Producers Cooperative
CRSPCoastal Rural Support Program
EIEquator Initiative
FRLHTFoundation for the Revitalization of Local Health Traditions
HCAHoney Care Africa Ltd.
INRENAInstituto Nacional de Recursos Naturales (Peruvian government)
MDGsMillennium Development Goals
MLFDMinistry of Livestock and Fisheries Development
NGONon-governmental organization
NRDDBNorth Rupununi District Development Board
PHMRPort Honduras Marine Reserve
PISPPastoralist Integrated Support Programme
RCRural Commune
RCMPCCRural Communes’ Medicinal Plant Conservation Center
RDFRoyal Forest Department
RECOFTRegional Community Forestry Training Center for Asia and the Pacific
TACTechnical Advisory Committee – Equator Initiative
TIDEToledo Institute for Development and Environment
TNCThe Nature Conservancy
UNDPUnited Nations Development Program
Acronyms in the Figures
Figure 1 – Thailand case
CODICommunity Organization Development Institute
DMCRDepartment of Marine and Coastal Resources
RDFRoyal Forest Department
RECOFTRegional Community Forestry Training Center for Asia and the Pacific
SIFSocial Investment Fund
TAOTambon Administration Organization
TRFThailand Research Fund
Figure 4 – Peru case
APECOAsociación Peruana para la Conservación de la Naturaleza (NGO)
CEDIACentro para el Desarrollo del Indígena Amazónico (NGO)
CMCasa Matsiguenka
COMARUConsejo Machiguenga del Río Urubamba (indigenous org.)
Ecotour-ManuAssociation of Manu Tour Operator Agencies
FANPEFortalecimiento del Sistema Nacional de Areas Naturales Protegidas por el Estado (national project funded by the GTZ)
GTZGesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (German Technical Cooperation)
INRENAInstituto Nacional de Recursos Naturales (government org.)
PNMParque Nacional del Manu (Manu Nacional Park)
Figure 5 – Belize case
TIDEToledo Institute for Development and Environment
TNCThe Nature Conservancy
Figure 6 – Kenya case – HCA
AKFAga Khan Foundation
CRSPCoastal Rural Support Program
HCAHoney Care Africa Ltd.
MLFDMinistry of Livestock and Fisheries Development
VDCVillage Development Committee
VDOVillage Development Organization
Figure 8 – India case
FRLHTFoundation for the Revitalization of Local Health Traditions
Figure 9 – Kenya case – PISP
ALRMPArid Lands Resource Management Project
CARITAS(NGO)
CDFConstituency Development Fund
CORDAIDCatholic Organization for Relief and Development Aid
DSGDistrict Steering Group
IIRRInternational Institute for Rural Reconstruction
ITDGIntermediate Technology Development Group
MPMember of Parliament
SMCSchool Management Committee
WESCOORDWater and Environmental Sanitation Coordination Group
Figure 10 – Guyana case
UNDP GEFGlobal Environment Facility – United Nations Development Program
DFIDDepartment for International Development
CIDACanadian International Development Agency
IUCNWorld Conservation Union – Netherlands committee
MamirauaMamiraua Institute For Sustainable Development
CIConservation International
ASAudubon Society: Latin America
U of FUniversity of Florida
MAAMinistry of Amerindian Affairs
MFCLMinistry of Fisheries Crops and Livestock
GFCGuyana Forestry Commission
THAGTourism and Hospitality Association of Guyana
GTAGuyana Tourism Authority
GATGuyana Aquarium Traders
RVRock View
FPAForestry Producers Association
CFCCommunity Fisheries Committee members
MRMakushi Researchers – Makushi Researcher Unit
CEWCommunity Environmental Workers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.133 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Published on: Oct 5, 2009
Published by: Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving Services for IASC
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2009 Cristiana Simão Seixas, Fikret Berkes, published by Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving Services for IASC
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.