Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Potential and limitations of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) as a means to manage watershed services in mainland Southeast Asia Cover

Potential and limitations of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) as a means to manage watershed services in mainland Southeast Asia

Open Access
|Apr 2009

Figures & Tables

figures/ijc2009-200907-001.jpg
Figure 1

Number of years of cultivation since 1995 in the Mae Thang watershed, Thailand.

figures/ijc2009-200907-002.jpg
Figure 2

The Huay Xong watershed, Lao PDR.

figures/ijc2009-200907-003.jpg
Figure 3

Average annual income per household in the sampled villages in Laos.

figures/ijc2009-200907-004.jpg
Figure 4

Responses in Ban Pong village to the question “Are these environmental issues of concern for you?”.

figures/ijc2009-200907-005.jpg
Figure 5

Spatial relationship between the different water users along the Houay Xon.

figures/ijc2009-200907-006.jpg
Figure 6

Evolution of the share of households’ income generated by agriculture in two study villages from 1993 to 2003.

Table 1

Selection of possible environmental management practices and estimated costs in the Laos site.

Proposed solutionCost in USD/inhabitant/month
Improved fallow 0.22
Contour planting 0.20
Conservation agriculture (i.e. zero tillage, crop rotations and permanent soil cover) 0.16
Grass on river banks<0.016
Tree corridors/plantations 0.15
Garbage collection system 0.23
Grey water collection system 0.46
Toilet construction20#

[i] Note: 1 USD=8750 LAK; # was a one-off payment.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.131 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Published on: Apr 2, 2009
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2009 Alana George, Alain Pierret, Arthorn Boonsaner, Valentin Christian, Olivier Planchon, published by Igitur, Utrecht Publishing &#x0026; Archiving Services for IASC
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.