Abstract
This study investigated the contribution of Prickly Pears (Opuntia ficus-indica) to total household income within Lepelle Nkumpi Local Municipality, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Despite their classification as an invasive species, Prickly Pears notably contribute to the income of economically disadvantaged households. Descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression were employed to analyze data collected from 72 households engaged in the sale of Prickly Pears. The results reveal significant correlations between the frequency of sales per season, agricultural knowledge, harvesting frequency per season, and income from prickly pear sales. Transportation expenses were found to positively affect household income, suggesting that a wider market reach and increased sales volumes compensated for higher costs. These findings underscore the importance of wild fruits like Prickly Pears in poverty alleviation, particularly in regions with high unemployment rates. They emphasize the need for balanced policy approaches taking into account both economic benefits and environmental concerns related to invasive species. Thus, the study offers insights into the socioeconomic dynamics of wild fruit trade, emphasizing the interplay between income generation, agricultural practices, and environmental conservation. Future research should further explore these dynamics to inform evidence-based policies promoting sustainable livelihoods and food security in marginalized communities.