Table 1
Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlations for the study variables (N = 319).
| MEAN | SD | 1. | 2. | 3. | 4. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Faith in recruiter intuition | 4.17 | 1.53 | – | |||
| 2. Faith in recruiter expertise | 4.59 | 0.72 | 0.27*** (0.17, 0.37) | – | ||
| 3. Preference for holistic methods | 5.31 | 1.56 | 0.28*** (0.18, 0.37) | 0.06 (–0.05, 0.17) | – | |
| 4. Process favorability for unstructured interviews | 4.10 | 1.42 | 0.35*** (0.25, 0.44) | 0.13* (0.02, 0.23) | 0.17** (0.07, 0.27) | – |
| 5. Process favorability for structured interviews | 4.86 | 1.15 | –0.10 (–0.21, 0.00) | –0.00 (–0.11, 0.10) | –0.12* (–0.23, 0.02) | –0.18** (–0.28, –0.07) |
[i] Note: Numbers in parentheses are 95 % CI. All variables were measured on a scale from 1–7.
* p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001, two-tailed.
Table 2
Model coefficients of the multiple regression analysis predicting process favorability for unstructured interviews (N = 319; model R2 = 0.145***).
| PREDICTOR | β | 95% CI LOWER | 95% CI HIGHER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Faith in recruiter intuition | 0.31*** | 0.21 | 0.42 |
| Faith in recruiter expertise | 0.04 | –0.07 | 0.14 |
| Preference for holistic methods | 0.06 | –0.04 | 0.17 |
| Process favorability for structured interviews | –0.12* | –0.22 | –0.02 |
[i] Note: * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001, two-tailed.