Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
‘A Limited Guardian Should First and Foremost Get to Know the Person He Helps’—Experiences of Having a Limited Guardian from the Perspective of Adults with Intellectual Disability Cover

‘A Limited Guardian Should First and Foremost Get to Know the Person He Helps’—Experiences of Having a Limited Guardian from the Perspective of Adults with Intellectual Disability

Open Access
|Dec 2022

References

  1. Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. ‘Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.’ Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  2. Brown, Geraldine, and Nicola Standen. 2011. ‘Exploring the Advocacy Needs for Older People with Mental Health Problems in the West Midlands.’ Community Care Policy & Practice 15(1): 138. DOI: 10.5042/wwop.2011.0115
  3. Boylan, Jane, and Pauline Ing. 2005. ‘‘Seen but Not Heard’—Young People’s Experience of Advocacy.’ International Journal of Social Welfare 14(1): 212. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2005.00334.x
  4. Carney, T., C. Bigby, S. Then, E. Smith, I. Wiesel, and J. Douglas. 2021. ‘Paternalism to Empowerment: All in the Eye of the Beholder?’ Disability & Society. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2021.1941781
  5. Carney, T., S. Then, C. Bigby, I. Wiesel, J. Douglas, and E. Smith. 2019. ‘Realising “Will Preferences and Rights”: Reconciling Differences on Best Practice Support for Decision-Making?’ Griffith Law Review 28(4): 357379. DOI: 10.1080/10383441.2019.1690741
  6. Castleberry, Ashley, and Amanda Nolen. 2018. ‘Thematic Analysis of Qualitative Research Data: Is It as Easy as It Sounds?’ Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 10(6): 80715. DOI: 10.1080/13691457.2020.1820451
  7. Douglas, J., and C. Bigby. 2018. ‘Development of an Evidence-Based Practice Framework to Guide Decision Making Support for People with Cognitive Impairment due to Acquired Brain Injury or Intellectual Disability.’ Disability and Rehabilitation 42:3, 43441. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1498546
  8. Douglas, J., and Bigby, C. 2020. Development of an evidence-based practice framework to guide decision making support for people with cognitive impairment due to acquired brain injury or intellectual disability. Disability and Rehabilitation 42(3): 434441. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1498546
  9. Douglas, J., C. Bigby, L. Knox, and M. Browning. 2015. ‘Factors That Underpin the Delivery of Effective Decision-Making Support for People with Cognitive Disability.’ Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 2:1, 3744. DOI: 10.1080/23297018.2015.1036769
  10. Fridström Montoya, Therése. 2015. Leva som andra genom ställföreträdare: en rättslig och faktisk paradox. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
  11. Giertz, Lottie. 2018. ‘Guardianship for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: Accountant, Advocate or “Family” Member?’ Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 20(1): 25665. DOI: 10.16993/sjdr.40
  12. Giertz, Lottie. 2012. Erkännande, makt och möten: En studie av inflytande och självbestämmande med LSS, Linneus University PhD diss. Växjö, Kalmar: Linneus University Press.
  13. Giertz, Lottie, Tina Mattsson, and Angelika Thelin. 2021. Nedsatt beslutsförmåga—rätt, riktlinjer och praktik. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  14. Holmqvist, Anna, Maria Eriksson, and Magnus Tideman. 2022. ‘Being Represented by Others due to Diminished Decision Capacity—A Review of Research Literature.’ Nordic Social Work Research. DOI: 10.1080/2156857X.2022.2029549
  15. Mazzotti, Valerie L., Kelly R. Kelley, and Cassie M. Coco. 2015. ‘Effects of Self-Directed Summary of Performance on Postsecondary Education Students’ Participation in Person-Centered Planning Meetings.’ Journal of Special Education 48(4): 24355. DOI: 10.1177/0022466913483575
  16. Odelöw, Torbjörn. 2021. Kunnig, engagerad och tillgänglig. Om rollen som ställföreträdare för vuxna personer med intellektuell funktionsnedsättning. Göteborg: Handelshögskolan Göteborgs universitet/FUB.
  17. Överförmyndarstatistik. 2022. Retrieved June 23, 2022. Statistik - Överförmyndarstatistik (lansstyrelsen.se)
  18. Payne-Christiansen, Erin M., and Patricia L. Sitlington. 2008. ‘Guardianship: Its Role in the Transition Process for Students with Developmental Disabilities.’ Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities 43(1): 319.
  19. Ruegger, Maria. 2001. ‘Seen and Heard but How Well Informed? Children’s Perceptions of the Guardian and ad litem Service.’ Children & Society 15(3): 13345. DOI: 10.1002/chi.623
  20. SFS. 1983. Lagen om stöd och service till vissa funktionshindrade [The Act concerning Support and Service for persons with Certain Functional Impairment]. 1993: 387. Stockholm: Sveriges Riksdag.
  21. SFS (Svensk Författningssamling). 1949. Föräldrabalken [Parental Code].
  22. Sjöstedt, Daniel, and Peter Sporrstedt. 2020. God man och förvaltare: en handbok. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  23. SOU. 2004. 112. Frågor om förmyndare och ställföreträdare för vuxna.
  24. Stötzel, Manuela, and Jörg M. Fegert. 2006. ‘The Representation of Legal Interests of Children and Adolescents in Germany: A Study of the Children’s Guardian from a Child’s Perspective.’ International Journal of Law, Policy & Family 20(2): 20124. DOI: 10.1093/lawfam/ebi023
  25. Szmukler, George. 2019. ““Capacity”, “Best Interests”, “Will and Preferences” and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” World Psychiatry 18(1): 3441. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20584
  26. Teaster, Pamela B. 2002. ‘The Wards of Public Guardians: Voice of the Unbefriended.’ Family Relations 51(4): 34450. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2002.00344.x
  27. UNCRPD (United Nations Council on the Rights of Persons with Disability). 2006. Retrieved June 23, 2022. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html.
  28. Watson, Joanne. 2016. ‘Assumptions of Decision-Making Capacity: The Role Supporter Attitudes Play in the Realisation of Article 12 for People with Severe or Profound Intellectual Disability.’ Laws 5: 6. DOI: 10.3390/laws5010006
  29. Werner, Shirli, and Rachel Chabany. 2015. ‘Guardianship Law versus Supported Decision-Making Policies: Perceptions of Persons with Intellectual or Psychiatric Disability and Parents.’ American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 86(5): 48699. DOI: 10.1037/ort0000125
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.949 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 288 - 301
Submitted on: Jul 6, 2022
Accepted on: Nov 8, 2022
Published on: Dec 23, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Lill Hultman, Magnus Tideman, Maria Eriksson, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.