Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Self-Determination: What can we Learn from Persons with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities? Cover

Self-Determination: What can we Learn from Persons with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities?

Open Access
|Nov 2021

References

  1. Alvesson, M., and K. Sköldberg. 2018. Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research (Third edition). SAGE.
  2. Arnstein-Kerslake, Anna, Joanne Watson, Michelle Browning, Jonathan Martinis, and Peter Blanck. 2017. “Future direction in supported decision-making.” Disability studies quarterly 37(1). DOI: 10.18061/dsq.v37i1.5070
  3. Bick, Esther. 1946. “Notes on infant observation in psycho-analytic training.” In Surviving Space: Papers on Infant Observation (2002) edited by Andrew Briggs. London: Routledge.
  4. Bostad, Inga, and Halvor Hanisch. 2016. “Freedom and Disability Rights: Dependence, Independence, and Interdependence.” Metaphilosophy 47(3): 371384. DOI: 10.1111/meta.12192
  5. Cluley, Victoria. 2017. “Using photovoice to include people with profound and multiple learning disabilities in inclusive research.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 45(1): 3946. DOI: 10.1111/bld.12174
  6. Finlay, Linda. 1999. “Applying Phenomenology in Research: Problems, Principles and Practice.” The British journal of occupational therapy 62(7): 299306. DOI: 10.1177/030802269906200705
  7. Finlay, Linda. 2008. “A Dance Between the Reduction and Reflexivity: Explicating the ‘Phenomenological Psychological Attitude’”. Journal of phenomenological psychology 39(1): 132. DOI: 10.1163/156916208X311601
  8. Fleming, Courtney V., Geoffrey M. Wheeler, Helen I. Cannella-Malone, Abby R. Basbagill, Yi-Chieh Chung, and Kristall Graham Day. 2010. “An evaluation of the use of eye gaze to measure preference of individuals with severe physical and developmental disabilities.” Developmental Neurorehabiitation 13(4): 266275. DOI: 10.3109/17518421003705706
  9. Fuchs, Thomas. 2017. “Intercorporeality and Interaffectivity.” Phenomenology and mind (11): 194209. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210465.003.0001
  10. Gallagher, Shaun, and Denis Francesconi. 2012. “Teaching phenomenology to qualitative researchers, cognitive scientists, and phenomenologists.” Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 12(3): 110. DOI: 10.2989/IPJP.2012.12.1.4.1112
  11. Greathead, Scot, Rhiannon Yates, Vivian Hill, Lorcan Kenny, Abigail Croydon, and Elizabeth Pellicano. 2016. “Supporting children with severe to profound learning difficulties and complex communication needs to make their views known: Observation tools and methods.” Topics in Language Disorders 36(3): 217244. DOI: 10.1097/TLD.0000000000000096
  12. Hollway, Wendy. 2016. “Emotional experience plus reflection: Countertransference and reflexivity in research.” The Psychotherapist 62.
  13. Hoppe, Silke, Laura Vermeulen, Annelieke Driessen, Els Roding, Marje de Groot, and Kristine Krause. 2019. “Learning in Collaborative Moments: Practising Relating Differently with Dementia in Dialogue Meetings.” Anthropology in Action 26(3): 1022. DOI: 10.3167/aia.2019.260302
  14. Kaley, Alexandra, Chris Hatton, and Christine Milligan. 2019. “More Than Words: The Use of Video in Ethnographic Research With People With Intellectual Disabilities.” Qualitative Health Research 29(7): 93143. DOI: 10.1177/1049732318811704
  15. Kittay, Eva Feder. 2011. “The Ethics of Care, Dependence, and Disability.” Ratio juris 24(1): 4958. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00473.x
  16. Kittay, Eva Feder. 2019. Learning from my daughter: The value and care of disabled minds. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190844608.001.0001
  17. Kittay, Eva Feder. 2020. Love’s labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependency (Second ed.). New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315108926
  18. Liamputtong, Pranee. 2007. Researching the vulnerable: A guide to sensitive research methods. London: SAGE. DOI: 10.4135/9781849209861
  19. Maes, Bea, Sara Nijs, Sien Vandesande, Ines Van keer, Michael Arthur-Kelly, Juliane Dind, Juliet Goldbart, Geneviève Petitpierre, and Annette Van der Putten. 2021. “Looking back, looking forward: Methodological challenges and future directions in research on persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 34(1): 250262. DOI: 10.1111/jar.12803
  20. Mercieca, Duncan P. 2013. Living Otherwise: Students with Profound and Multiple Learning Disabilities as Agents in Educational Contexts. Leiden, Boston: Brill|Sense. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6209-131-3
  21. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964. “The Philsopher and his Shadow.” In Signs, 159181. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
  22. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2002. Phenomenology of perception. Phénoménologie de la perception. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203994610
  23. Mietola, Reetta, Sonja Miettinen, and Simo Vehmas. 2017. “Voiceless subjects? Research ethics and persons with profound intellectual disabilities.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20(3): 263274. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2017.1287872
  24. Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. 2020. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Fourth edition. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE.
  25. Moran, Dermot. 2017. “Intercorporeality and Intersubjectivity. A Phenomenological Exploration of Embodiment.” In Embodiment, enaction, and culture: Investigating the constitution of the shared world, edited by Christoph Durt, Thomas Fuchs and Christiand Tewes, 2546. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  26. Murphy, Elizabeth, Jennifer Clegg, and Kathryn Almack. 2011. “Constructing Adulthood in Discussions About the Futures of Young People With Moderate-Profound Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 24(1): 6173. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2010.00565.x
  27. Music, Graham. 2012. “How do we know the ways in which infants experience the world? Lessons from research.” In Infant Observation and Research. Emotional Processes in Everyday Life, edited by Cathy Urwin and Janine Sternberg. Hove and New York: Routledge.
  28. NESH. 2016. Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences, Humanities, Law and Theology. Retrieved from https://www.etikkom.no/globalassets/documents/english-publications/60127_fek_guidelines_nesh_digital_corr.pdf.
  29. Nind, Melanie, and Iva Strnadova. 2020. “Changes in the lives of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilites.” In Belonging for people with profound intellectual and mulitple disabilities. Pushing the Boundaries of Inclusion, edited by Melanie Nind and Iva Strnadova. Oxon and New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429260711
  30. Pink, Sarah. 2015. Doing sensory ethnography. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, Calif: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781473917057
  31. Roche, Laura, Jeff Sigafoos, Giulio E. Lancioni, Mark F. O’Reilly, and Vanessa A. Green. 2015. “Microswitch Technology for Enabling Self-Determined Responding in Children with Profound and Multiple Disabilities: A Systematic Review.” Augmentative Alternative Communication 31(3): 246258. DOI: 10.3109/07434618.2015.1024888
  32. Ryan, Richard M., and Edward L. Deci. 2004. “Autonomy Is No Illusion. Self-Determination Theory and the Empirical Study of Athenticity, Awareness and Will.” In Handbook of Existenital Psychology, edited by Jeff Greenberg, Sander Koole and Tom Pyszczynski. New York: The Guilford Press.
  33. Ryan, Richard M., and Edward L. Deci. 2017. Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Press. DOI: 10.1521/978.14625/28806
  34. Shogren, Karrie A. 2020. “Self-Determination, Preference, and Choice.” In Choice, Preference, and Disability: Promoting Self-Determination Across the Lifespan, edited by Roger J. Stancliffe, Michael L. Wehmeyer, Karrie A. Shogren and Brian H. Abery. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-35683-5_2
  35. Simmons, Ben, and Debbie Watson. 2015. “From Individualism to Co-construction and Back Again: Rethinking Research Methodology for Children with Profound and Multiple Learning Disabilities.” Child Care in Practice 21(1): 5066. DOI: 10.1080/13575279.2014.976179
  36. Skarstad, Kjersti. 2018. “Ensuring human rights for persons with intellectual disabilities?” The International Journal of Human Rights 22(6): 774800. DOI: 10.1080/13642987.2018.1454903
  37. Stefánsdóttir, Guðrún, Kristín Björnsdóttir, and Ástríður Stefánsdóttir. 2018. “Autonomy and People with Intellectual Disabilities Who Require More Intensive Support.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 20(1): 162171. DOI: 10.16993/sjdr.21
  38. Stern, D. 2005. “Intersubjectivity.” In The American psychiatric publishing textbook of psychoanalysis, 7792. Arlington, VA, US: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.
  39. Teachman, Gail, Peggy McDonough, Colin Macarthur, and Barbara E. Gibson. 2018. “A Critical Dialogical Methodology for Conducting Research With Disabled Youth Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication.” Qualitative Inquiry 24(1): 3544. DOI: 10.1177/1077800417727763
  40. Tuffrey-Wijne, Irene, Jane Bernal, and Sheila Hollins. 2008. “Doing research on people with learning disabilities, cancer and dying: Ethics, possibilities and pitfalls.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 36(3): 185190. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3156.2008.00519.x
  41. UN. 1948. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
  42. UN. 2006. “Convention on the Rights of persons with Disabilities (CRPD).” Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html.
  43. Vehmas, Simo, and Reetta Mietola. 2021. Narrowed Lives: Meaning, Moral Value, and Profound Intellectual Disability. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press. DOI: 10.16993/bbl
  44. Vorhaus, John Simon. 2014. “Philosophy and profound disability: Learning from experience.” Disability & Society 29(4): 611623. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2013.831749
  45. Watson, Joanne. 2012. “Supported decision making for people with severe or profound intellectual disability: ‘We’re all in this together, aren’t we?’” Paper presented at the 6th Roundtable on Intellectual Disability Policy ‘Services and Families Working Together’, Bundoora: LaTrobe University.
  46. Wehmeyer, Michael L. 2005. “Self-Determination and Individuals with Severe Disabilities: Re-examining Meanings and Misinterpretations.” Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 30(3): 113120. DOI: 10.2511/rpsd.30.3.113
  47. WHO. 2019. ICD-11. International Classification of Diseases for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics. Eleventh Revision. Retrieved from https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en.
  48. WMA. 2013. “Declaration of Helsinki.” Retrieved from https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/.
  49. Young, Iris Marion. 1997. Intersecting Voices. Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosphy, and Policy. Princton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780691216355
  50. Zahavi, Dan. 2019. Phenomenology: The Basics. New York: Taylor and Francis. DOI: 10.4324/9781315441603
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.830 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 317 - 327
Submitted on: Apr 28, 2021
Accepted on: Oct 11, 2021
Published on: Nov 1, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Synne Nese Skarsaune, Halvor Hanisch, Anita Gjermestad, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.