Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Investigating Court Accommodations for Persons with Severe Communication Disabilities: Perspectives of International Legal Experts Cover

Investigating Court Accommodations for Persons with Severe Communication Disabilities: Perspectives of International Legal Experts

Open Access
|Sep 2021

References

  1. Baker, John, Karina Lovell, and Neil Harris. 2006. “How Expert Are the Experts? An Exploration of the Concept of ‘expert’ within Delphi Panel Techniques.” Nurse Researcher 14(1): 5970. DOI: 10.7748/nr2006.10.14.1.59.c6010
  2. Beqiraj, Julinda, Lawrence Mcnamara, and Victoria Wicks. 2017. “Access to Justice for Persons with Disabilities: From International Principles to Practice.” International Bar Association.
  3. Beukelman, David R., and Janice C. Light. 2020. Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Supporting Children and Adults with Complex Communication Needs. Fifth. Baltimore, Maryland: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
  4. Biedermann, Narelle. 2018. “The Use of Facebook for Virtual Asynchronous Focus Groups in Qualitative Research.” Contemporary Nurse 54(1): 2634. DOI: 10.1080/10376178.2017.1386072
  5. Bornman, Juan, Robyn White, Ensa Johnson, and Diane Nelson Bryen. 2016. “Identifying Barriers in the South African Criminal Justice System: Implications for Individuals With Severe Communication Disability.” Acta Criminologica: Southern African Journal of Criminology 29(1): 117.
  6. Bowen, Phil, and Emily Gold LaGratta. 2014. “To Be Fair: Procedural Fairness in Courts.” Criminal Justice Alliance. http://www.justiceinnovation.org/better-courts/publications/be-fair-procedural-fairness-courts.
  7. Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2019. “Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11(4): 58997. DOI: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
  8. Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2020. “One Size Fits All? What Counts as Quality Practice in (Reflexive) Thematic Analysis?” Qualitative Research in Psychology, 125. DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
  9. Brems, Eva, and Laurens Lavrysen. 2013. “Procedural Justice in Human Rights Adjudication: The European Court of Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 35(1): 177200. DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2013.0000
  10. Bryen, Diane Nelson. 2014. “Ending the Silence of Violence: A View from the United States.” In Stop Violence against People with Disabilities: An International Resource, 1939. Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press.
  11. Chan, Jeffrey, Phillip French, Colin Hudson, and Lynne Webber. 2012. “Applying the CRPD to Safeguard the Rights of People with a Disability in Contact with the Criminal Justice System.” Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 19(4): 55865. DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2011.615777
  12. Cortini, Michela, Teresa Galanti, and Stefania Fantinelli. 2019. “Focus Group Discussion: How Many Participants in a Group?” Encyclopaideia 23(54): 2943. DOI: 10.6092/issn.1825-8670/9603
  13. Cremin, Kevin M. 2016. “What Does Access to Justice Require? — Overcoming Barriers to Invoke the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” Frontiers of Law in China 11(2): 280322. DOI: 10.3868/s050-005-016-0017-7
  14. Creswell, John W., and Vicki L. Plano Clark. 2018. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage Publications.
  15. Dagut, Helen, and Ruth Morgan. 2003. “Barriers to Justice: Violations of the Rights of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing People in the South African Justice System.” South African Journal on Human Rights 19(1): 2756. DOI: 10.1080/19962126.2003.11865171
  16. Degener, Theresia. 2016. “Disability in a Human Rights Context.” Laws 5(3): 35. DOI: 10.3390/laws5030035
  17. Doak, Jonathan, and Lauran Doak. 2017. “Non-Verbal Victims in the Adversarial Criminal Process: Communication, Competency, and Credibility.” Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 68. https://heinonline-org.uplib.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?public=true&handle=hein.journals/nilq68&div=40&start_page=451&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=102&men_tab=srchresults. DOI: 10.53386/nilq.v68i4.59
  18. Dorfman, Doron. 2017. “Re-Claiming Disability: Identity, Procedural Justice, and the Disability Determination Process.” Law and Social Inquiry 42(1): 195231. DOI: 10.1111/lsi.12176
  19. Ellem, Kathy, and Kelly Richards. 2018. “Police Contact with Young People with Cognitive Disabilities: Perceptions of Procedural (In)Justice.” Youth Justice 18(3): 23047. DOI: 10.1177/1473225418794357
  20. Etikan, Ilker, Sulaiman Abubakar Musa, and Rukayya Sunus Alkassim. 2016. “Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling.” American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics 5(1): 14. DOI: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  21. Flynn, Eilionóir. 2016. Disabled Justice? Access to Justice and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
  22. Goldschmidt, Jenny E. 2017. “New Perspectives on Equality: Towards Transformative Justice through the Disability Convention?” Nordic Journal of Human Rights 35(1): 114. DOI: 10.1080/18918131.2017.1286131
  23. Gooding, Piers, Anna Arstein-Kerslake, Sarah Mercer, and Bernadette McSherry. 2017. “Supporting Accused Persons with Cognitive Disabilities to Participate in Criminal Proceedings in Australia: Avoiding the Pitfalls of Unfitness to Stand Trial Laws.” Law in Context: A Socio-Legal Journal 35. DOI: 10.26826/law-in-context.v35i2.15
  24. Holness, Willene. 2014. “Equal Recognition and Legal Capacity for Persons with Disabilities: Incorporating the Principle of Proportionality.” South African Journal on Human Rights 30(2): 31344. DOI: 10.1080/19962126.2014.11865111
  25. Home Office: National Appropriate Adult Network. 2011. “Guide for Apprioprate Adults.” London. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guide-for-appropriate-adults.
  26. Jensen, Mark P., Kendra S. Liljenquist, Fraser Bocell, Arnold R. Gammaitoni, Carey R. Aron, Bradley S. Galer, and Dagmar Amtmann. 2017. “Life Impact of Caregiving for Severe Childhood Epilepsy: Results of Expert Panels and Caregiver Focus Groups.” Epilepsy and Behavior 74: 13543. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.06.012
  27. Johansson, Elin. 2019. “How Can Remote Communication Be Made More Accessible to People with Communication Disabilities?” Chalmers University of Technology.
  28. Kermit, Patrick, Odd Morten Mjøen, and Terje Olsen. 2011. “Safe in the Hands of the Interpreter? A Qualitative Study Investigating the Legal Protection of Deaf People Facing the Criminal Justice System in Norway.” Disability Studies Quarterly 31(4). DOI: 10.18061/dsq.v31i4.1714
  29. Kuosmanen, Jari, and Mikaela Starke. 2015. “Access to Sweden’s Legal System of Crime Victims With Intellectual Disability Involved in Prostitution Activities.” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 12(4): 25565. DOI: 10.1111/jppi.12135
  30. Lijadi, Anastasia Aldelina, and Gertina Johanna Van Schalkwyk. 2015. “Online Facebook Focus Group Research of Hard-to-Reach Participants.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. DOI: 10.1177/1609406915621383
  31. Lord, Janet E., and Rebecca Brown. 2011. “The Role of Reasonable Accommodation in Securing Substantive Equality for Persons with Disabilities: The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” Critical Perspectives on Human Rights and Disability Law 117: 273308. DOI: 10.1163/ej.9789004189508.i-552
  32. Minkowitz, Tina. 2017. “CRPD and Transformative Equality.” International Journal of Law in Context 13. https://heinonline-org.uplib.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?public=true&handle=hein.journals/injwcext13&div=10&start_page=77&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=1108&men_tab=srchresults. DOI: 10.1017/S1744552316000483
  33. Msipa, Dianah. 2015. “How Assessments of Testimonial Competence Perpetuate Inequality and Discrimination for Persons with Intellectual Disabilities: An Analysis of the Approach Taken in South Africa and Zimbabwe.” African Disability Rights Yearbook 3: 6390. DOI: 10.17159/2413-7138/2015/v3n1a3
  34. Murphy, Wendy. 2014. “Traumatized Children Who Participate in Legal Proceedings Are Entitled to Testimonial and Participatory Accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act.” Roger Williams University Law Review 19. https://docs.rwu.edu/rwu_LR/vol19/iss2/3.
  35. Nowell, Lorelli S., Jill M. Norris, Deborah E. White, and Nancy J. Moules. 2017. “Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16(1): 113. DOI: 10.1177/1609406917733847
  36. Olsen, Terje, and Patrick Kermit. 2015. “Disability and Justice.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 17: 16. DOI: 10.1080/15017419.2015.1064029
  37. Pennington, Liana. 2015. “A Case Study Approach to Procedural Justice: Parents’ View in Two Juvenile Delinquency Courts in the United States.” British Journal of Criminology 55. https://heinonline-org.uplib.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?public=true&handle=hein.journals/bjcrim55&div=72&start_page=901&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=2920&men_tab=srchresults. DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azu109
  38. Reisner, Sari L., Renee K. Randazzo, Jaclyn M. White Hughto, Sarah Peitzmeier, Zachary Dubois, Dana J. Pardee, Elliot Marrow, et al. 2018. “Sensitive Health Topics With Underserved Patient Populations: Methodological Considerations for Online Focus Group Discussions.” Qualitative Health Research 28(10): 165873. DOI: 10.1177/1049732317705355
  39. Skelton, Kara, Retta Evans, Jenna Lachenaye, Jonathan Amsbary, Martha Wingate, and Laura Talbott. 2018. “Utilization of Online Focus Groups to Include Mothers : A Use-Case Design, Reflection, and Recommendations.” Digital Health 4: 16. DOI: 10.1177/2055207618777675
  40. Stewart, David W., and Prem Shamdasani. 2017. “Online Focus Groups.” Journal of Advertising 46(1): 4860. DOI: 10.1080/00913367.2016.1252288
  41. Tates, Kiek, Marieke Zwaanswijk, Roel Otten, Sandra Van Dulmen, Peter M. Hoogerbrugge, Willem A. Kamps, and Jozien M. Bensing. 2009. “Online Focus Groups as a Tool to Collect Data in Hard-to-Include Populations: Examples from Paediatric Oncology.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 9(1): 18. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-15
  42. Tyler, Tom R. 2008. “Procedural Justice and the Courts.” Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 44(1/2): 2531.
  43. Tyler, Tom R., Phillip Atiba Goff, and Robert J. MacCoun. 2015. The Impact of Psychological Science on Policing in the United States: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Effective Law Enforcement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 16. DOI: 10.1177/1529100615617791
  44. United Nations. 2006. “Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” Treaty Series 2515: 3. http://www.un.org/disabilities/.
  45. White, Robyn, Juan Bornman, Ensa Johnson, and Dianah Msipa. 2020a. “Court Accommodations for Persons with Severe Communication Disabilities: A Legal Scoping Review.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, no. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1037/law0000289
  46. White, Robyn, Juan Bornman, Ensa Johnson, Karen Tewson, and Joan van Niekerk. 2020b. “Transformative Equality: Court Accommodations for South African Citizens with Severe Communication Disabilities.” African Journal of Disability 9: 112. DOI: 10.4102/ajod.v9i0.651
  47. Williams, Sarah, Maria Giatsi Clausen, Ann Robertson, Susi Peacock, and Kerri McPherson. 2012. “Methodological Reflections on the Use of Asynchronous Online Focus Groups in Health Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 11(4): 36883. DOI: 10.1177/160940691201100405
  48. Wood, George, Tom R. Tyler, and Andrew V. Papachristos. 2020. “Procedural Justice Training Reduces Police Use of Force and Complaints against Officers.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117(18): 981521. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1920671117
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.779 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 224 - 235
Submitted on: Nov 18, 2020
Accepted on: Aug 13, 2021
Published on: Sep 14, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Robyn White, Ensa Johnson, Juan Bornman, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.