Table 1
Identification (ID), gender, occupation and QH areas.
| ID | Gender | Occupation | QH areas |
|---|---|---|---|
| i1 | M | Academic designer | IND+UNI |
| i2 | M | Accessibility expert | IND+UNI+CIV |
| i3 | F | Architect & Activist | IND-CIV |
| i4 | M | Designer | IND |
| i5 | F | Academic architect | UNI |
| i6 | F | Disability Activist | CIV |
| i7 | M | Civil servant | GOV+CIV |
| i8 | M | Civil servant | GOV |
Table 2
Categories, subcategories and number of codes according to qualitative content analysis (Graneheim & Lundman 2004).
| Category | Subcategories with number of codes |
|---|---|
| Opinions | The term UD (9), Use of UD (9), Attitudes (2) |
| Strategies | Policy (9), Justice (9), Struggle (9), Process (7) |
| Observations | History (6), Trends (3), Conflicts (2) |
Table 3
Function, orientation, application, goal and dilemma of the three ways of talking about UD.
| Ways of talking about UD | Function | Orientation | Application | Goal | Dilemma |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guiding | Process tool | Instrumen-tal | Design process | Accessibility | Abstract |
| Striving | Ideal | Visionary | Society | UD | Utopian |
| Unifying | Integrating | Conviction-al | Policy level | Inclusion | Conflict of interest |