Insider, Outsider or an In-Betweener? Epistemological Reflections of a Legally Blind Researcher on Conducting Cross-National Disability Research
By: Gagan Chhabra
References
- Barnes, Colin. 1996. “Disability and the Myth of the Independent Researcher.” Disability and Society 18(1): 107–110. DOI: 10.1080/09687599650023362
- Barnes, Colin. 2008.
“An Ethical Agenda in Disability Research: Rhetoric or reality?” In The Handbook of Social Research Ethics, edited by Donna M. Mertens and Pauline E. Ginsberg, 458–473. London: SAGE Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781483348971.n29 - Bridges, David. 2017.
“‘Nothing about us without us’: The ethics of outsider research.” In Philosophy in Educational Research. New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-49212-4_20 - Brinkmann, Svend, and Steinar Kvale. 2015. InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
- Charlton, James I. 1998. Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability Oppression and Empowerment. Berkley: University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/9780520925441
- Chaudhry, Vandana. 2018. “Knowing Through Tripping: A Performative Praxis for Co-Constructing Knowledge as a Disabled Halfie.” Qualitative Inquiry 24(1): 70–82. DOI: 10.1177/1077800417728961
- Chhabra, Gagan. 2020. “Turning a blind eye to employers’ discrimination? Attitudinal barrier perceptions of vision impaired youth from Oslo and Delhi.” Disability & Society. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2020.1816905
- Corbin Dwyner, Sonya, and Jennifer L. Buckle. 2009. “The Space Between: On Being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8(1): 54–63. DOI: 10.1177/160940690900800105
- Crossley, Michael, Arthur Lore, and Elizabeth McNess. 2016. Revisiting insider–outsider research in comparative and international education. Oxford: Symposium Books. DOI: 10.15730/books.93
- Fay, Brian. 1996. Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science: A Multicultural Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Ghai, Anita. 2015. Rethinking Disability in India. New Delhi: Routledge.
- Goodley, Dan. 2017. Disabilities Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
- Grech, Shaun, and Karen Soldatic (eds.). 2016. Disability in the Global South: The Critical Handbook. New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42488-0
- Griffith, Alison. 1998. “Insider/Outsider: Epistemological Privilege and Mothering Work.” Human Studies 21(4): 361–376. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005421211078
- Gustavsson, Anders. 2004. “The role of theory in disability research - springboard or strait- jacket?” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 6(1): 55–70. Retrieved from
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15017410409512639?journalCode=sjdr2 0 on 25th Oct-2016. DOI: 10.1080/15017410409512639 - Halvorsen, Rune, and Bjørn Hvinden (eds.). 2018. Youth, diversity and employment in times of crisis and economic restructuring–an introduction. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781783476008.00006
- Hellawell, David. 2006. “Inside-out: Analysis of the insider-outsider concept as a heuristic device to develop reflexivity in students doing qualitative research.” Teaching in Higher Education 11(4): 483–494. DOI: 10.1080/13562510600874292
- Humphrey, Caroline. 2007. “Insider-Outsider: Activating the hyphen.” Action Research 5(1): 11–26. DOI: 10.1177/1476750307072873
- Meekosha, Helen. 2008. “Contextualizing disability: Developing Southern/global theory.” Transcript of Keynote Address 4th Biennial Disability Studies Conference,
Lancaster University , UK,September 4 . - Merton, Robert K. 1972. “Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge.” American Journal of Sociology 78(1): 9–47. DOI: 10.1086/225294
- Morris, Jenny. (Ed.) 1996. Encounters with strangers: Feminism and disability. London: The Women’s Press.
- Oliver, Michael. 1990. The Politics of Disablement. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-20895-1
- Oliver, Michael. 1992. “Changing the Social Relations of Research Production?” Disability, Handicap and Society 7(2): 101–114. DOI: 10.1080/02674649266780141
- Pothier, Dianna, and Richard Devlin. 2006. Critical Disability Theory. Essays in Philosophy, Politics, Policy, and Law. Vancouver: UBC Press.
- Shakespeare, Tom. 2014. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315887456
- Simmel, Georg. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Translated and edited by Kurt H. Wolff. New York: Free Press.
- Stone, Emma, and Mark Priestley. 1996. “Parasites, Pawns and Partners: Disability Research and the Role of Non-disabled Researchers.” British Journal of Sociology 47(4): 699–716. ISSN 0007-1315. DOI: 10.2307/591081
- Thomas, Carol. 2006. “Disability and Gender: Reflections on Theory and Research.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 8(2–3): 177–185. DOI: 10.1080/15017410600731368
- Traustadóttir, Rannveig. 2006. “Disability and Gender: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 8(2–3): 81–84. DOI: 10.1080/15017410600831341
- Yin, Robert. 2012. Applications of Case Study Research. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.696 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 307 - 317
Submitted on: Dec 30, 2019
Accepted on: Oct 29, 2020
Published on: Nov 12, 2020
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2020 Gagan Chhabra, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.