Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Arts, Disability and Crip Theory: Temporal Re-Imagining in Social Care for People with Profound and Multiple Learning Disabilities Cover

Arts, Disability and Crip Theory: Temporal Re-Imagining in Social Care for People with Profound and Multiple Learning Disabilities

By:  and    
Open Access
|Mar 2020

References

  1. Artlink. 2019. “Artlink.” Accessed November 10. https://www.artlinkedinburgh.co.uk/.
  2. Bone, K. M. 2017. “Trapped behind the glass: Crip theory and disability identity.” Disability and Society 32(9): 12971314. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2017.1313722
  3. Butler, J. 2004. Undoing Gender. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203499627
  4. Campbell, F. K. 2009. The Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Ableism. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230245181
  5. Cherry Road Learning Centre. 2019. “Cherry Road Learning Centre.” Accessed November 10. https://cherryroadlearningcentre.com/.
  6. Dewey, J. 1934. Art as Experience. New York: Penguin Books.
  7. Douglas, P., C. Rice, and C. Kelly. 2018. Guest Editors: “Cripping Care: Care Pedagogies and Practices”, Cripping Care and Care Pedagogies and Practice Special Forum. Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal 13(4): 312.
  8. Eichsteller, G., and S. Holthoff. 2012. “The Art of Being a Social Pedagogue: Developing cultural change in children’s homes in Essex.” The International Journal of Social Pedagogy 1(1): 3046. DOI: 10.14324/111.444.ijsp.2012.v1.1.004
  9. Fox, A. M., and C. Sandahl. 2018. “Beyond ‘Cripping Up’: An Introduction.” Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies 12: 2. DOI: 10.3828/jlcds.2018.10
  10. Freire, P. 1972. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Penguin: Harmondsworth.
  11. Garcia-Santesmases Fernandez, A., and M. Arenas Conejo. 2017. “Playing Crip: The politics of disabled artists’ performances in Spain”, Themed Issue: International Perspectives on Performance. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 22(3): 345351. DOI: 10.1080/13569783.2017.1327804
  12. Gilligan, C. 1982. In a Different Voice:Ppsychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  13. Ginsburg, F., and R. Rapp. 2017. “Cripping the New Normal: Making Disability Count.” ALTER European Journal of Disability Research 11(3): 179192. DOI: 10.1016/j.alter.2017.06.003
  14. Goodley, D., and K. Runswick-Cole. 2015. “Big Society? Disabled people with the label of learning disabilities and the queer(y)ing of civil society.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 17(1): 113. DOI: 10.1080/15017419.2014.941924
  15. Hamalainen, J. 2003. “The concept of social pedagogy in the field of social work.” Journal of Social Work 3(1): 6980. DOI: 10.1177/1468017303003001005
  16. Hamalainen, J. 2012. “Social Pedagogical Eyes in the Midst of Diverse Understandings, Conceptualisations and Activities.” International Journal of Social Pedagogy 1(1): 316. DOI: 10.14324/111.444.ijsp.2012.v1.1.002
  17. Hatton, K. 2017. “A critical examination of the knowledge contribution service user and carer involvement brings to social work education.” Social Work Education: An International Journal 36(2): 154171. DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2016.1254769
  18. Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell.
  19. Hollingsworth, S. 2018. Thinking and Being through Difference. Unpublished.
  20. hooks, B. 1994. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.
  21. Horrigan-Kelly, M., M. Millar, and M. Dowling. 2016. “Understanding the Key Tenets of Heidegger’s Philosophy for Interpretative Phenomenological Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 15(1) 18. DOI: 10.1177/1609406916680634
  22. Huss, E., and E. Bos. (eds.) 2018. Art in Social Work Practice: Theory and Practice: International Perspectives. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315144245
  23. Ineland, J., and L. Sauer. 2007. “Institutional Environments and Sub-Cultural Belonging: Theatre and Intellectual Disabilities.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 9(1): 4657. DOI: 10.1080/15017410601029770
  24. Kafer, A. 2013. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  25. Kuppers, P. 2013. Disability Culture and Community Performance: Find a Strange and Twisted Shape. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  26. Levy, S. 2018. “Re-creating the Social Work Imagination: Embedding the arts in social work discourse in Scotland”. In Art in Social Work Practice: Theory and Practice: International Perspectives, edited by Ephrat Huss and Eltje Bos, 4456. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315144245-6
  27. Levy, S., A. Robb, and D. Jindal-Snape. 2017. “Disability, Personalisation and Community Arts: Exploring the spatial dynamics of children with disabilities participating in inclusive music classes.” Disability and Society 32(2): 254268. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2016.1276433
  28. Levy, S., and H. Young. 2018. The Ripple Effect: Relational Social Care through Art. Dundee: University of Dundee. Available at: https://www.scribd.com/document/393964577/The-Ripple-Effect#download&from_embed.
  29. Lloyd, K. 2014. Uncommon Ground: Radical approaches to artistic practice. Edinburgh: Artlink.
  30. Lloyd, K. 2015. “Being With, Across, Over and Through: Art’s Caring Subjects, Ethics Debates and Encounters.” In Economy: Art Production and The Subject in the 21st Century, edited by Kirsten Llyod and Angela Dimitrakaki, 140157. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
  31. Löfgren-Mårtenson, L. 2013 “‘Hip to be Crip?’ About Crip Theory, Sexuality and People with Intellectual Disabilities.” Sexuality and Disability 31(4): 413424. DOI: 10.1007/s11195-013-9287-7
  32. McRuer, R. 2006. Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. New York: New York University Press.
  33. Nissen, L. B. 2017. “Art and Social Work: History and Collaborative Possibilities for Interdisciplinary Synergy.” Research on Social Work Practice 110. DOI: 10.1177/1049731517733804
  34. Nussbaum, M. 2011. Creating Capabilities: A Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.4159/harvard.9780674061200
  35. Peers, D., M. Brittain, and R. McRuer. 2012. “Crip Excess, Art, and Politics: A Conversation with Robert McRuer.” The Review of Education, Pedagogy and Cultural Studies 34(3/4): 148155. DOI: 10.1080/10714413.2012.687284
  36. Price, M. 2011. Mad at School: Rhetorics of Mental Disability and Academic Life. Michigan: University of Michigan Press. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.1612837
  37. Rice, C., E. Chandler, J. Rinaldi, K. Liddiard, N. Changfoot, R. Mykitiuk, and I. Mundel. 2017. “Imagining Disability Futurities.” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 32(2): 213229. DOI: 10.1111/hypa.12321
  38. Sandahl, C. 2003. “Queering the Crip or Cripping the Queer?: Intersections of queer and crip identities in solo autobiographical performance.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 9(1–2): 2556. DOI: 10.1215/10642684-9-1-2-25
  39. Scottish Government. 2014. “Statutory Guidance to accompany the Social Care (Self-directed Support) (Scotland) Act 2013.” https://www.gov.scot/publications/statutory-guidance-accompany-social-care-self-directed-support-scotland-act-2013/pages/11/.
  40. Sen, A. 1988. Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.
  41. Simmons, B., and D. Watson. 2014. The PMLD Ambiguity: Articulating the Life-Worlds of Children with Profound and Multiple Learning Disabilities. London: Karmac.
  42. Simpson, M. K. 2014. Modernity and the Appearance of Idiocy: Intellectual Disability as a Regime of Truth. Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press.
  43. Smith, J. A., P. Flowers, and M. Larkin, 2013. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. London: Sage.
  44. Tronto, J. C. 1993. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.
  45. Webb, S. A. 2015. “An appeal for Slow Social Work.” Paper presented at VIII International Social Work Seminar. Lisbon: Catholic University of Portugal.
  46. Wood, T. 2017. “Cripping Time in the College Composition Classroom.” College Composition and Communication 69(2): 260286.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.620 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 68 - 79
Submitted on: Jan 15, 2019
Accepted on: Jan 26, 2020
Published on: Mar 10, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Susan Levy, Hannah Young, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.