Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Negotiating Authority: Disability, Interactions and Power Relations on Twitter Cover

Negotiating Authority: Disability, Interactions and Power Relations on Twitter

Open Access
|Sep 2019

References

  1. Allan, Stuart. 2009. “Histories of citizen journalism.” In Citizen Journalism, edited by Stuart Allen, and Einar, Thorsen, 1731, New York: Peter Lang.
  2. Barak, Azy, and Yael Sadovsky. 2008. “Internet use and personal empowerment of hearing-impaired adolescents.” Computers in Human Behavior 24: 18021815. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.007
  3. Buchholz, Margret, U. Ferm, and Kristina Holmgren. 2018. “Support persons’ views on remote communication and social media for people with communicative and cognitive disabilities.” Disability and Rehabilitation. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1529827
  4. Caron, Jessica, and Janice Light. 2016. “Social Media has opened a World of ‘Open communication:’ Experiences of adults with cerebral palsy who use augmentative and alternative communication and social media.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 32: 2540. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00362.x
  5. Castells, Manuel. 2003. The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Chadwick, Darren, Caroline Wesson, and Chris Fullwood. 2013. “Internet access by people with intellectual disabilities: Inequalities and opportunities.” Future Internet 5: 376397. DOI: 10.3390/fi5030376
  7. Cocq, Coppélie. 2015. “Indigenous voices on the web: Folksonomies and Endangered Languages.” Journal of American Folklore 128(509): 273285. DOI: 10.5406/jamerfolk.128.509.0273
  8. CODEX. 2011. “Etiska regler och riktlinjer för forskning” [Ethical rules and guidelines for research]. Vetenskapsrådet, Uppsala University. Retrieved from http://www.codex.vr.se/.
  9. Coyle, Cheryl L., and Heather Vaughn. 2008. “Social networking: communication revolution or evolution?” Bell Labs Technical Journal 13(2): 1317. DOI: 10.1002/bltj.20298
  10. Dean, Jodi. 2003. “Why the Net Is Not a Public Sphere.” Constellations 10(1): 95112. March. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8675.00315
  11. Dobransky, Kerry, and Eszter Hargittai. 2016. “Unrealized potential: exploring the digital disability divide.” In Poetics 58: 1828. DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2016.08.003
  12. Durkin, Kevin, and Gina Conti-Ramsden. 2014. “Turn off or tune in? What advice can SLTs, educational psychologists and teachers provide about uses of new media and children with language impairments?” Child Language, Teaching and Therapy 30: 187205. DOI: 10.1177/0265659013511471
  13. Ellis, Katie, and Mike Kent. 2011. Disability and New Media. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203831915
  14. Ellison, Nicole, Cliff Lampe, Charles Steinfield, and Jessica Vitak. 2010. “With a little help from my friends: Social network sites and social capital.” In The Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites, edited by Zizi Papacharissi, 124145. New York: Routledge.
  15. Ellison, Nicole, Jessica Vitak, Rebecca Gray, and Cliff Lampe. 2014. “Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19(4): 855870. DOI: 10.1111/jcc4.12078
  16. Gelfgren, Stefan. 2017. “The dyophysite nature of internet: Negotiating authorities within institutionalized Christianity.” Cultural Analysis 16(1): 83100.
  17. Goggin, Gerard. 2018. “Disability and digital inequalities: Rethinking digital divides with disability theory.” In Theorizing Digital Divides, edited by Massimo Ragnedda, and Glenn Muschert, 6374. London and New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315455334-6
  18. Goggin, Gerard, Scott Hollier, and Wayne Hawkins. 2017. “Internet accessibility and disability policy: Lessons for digital inclusion from Australia.” Journal of Internet Regulation 6(1): 118.
  19. Goldstein, Diane. 2015. “Vernacular Turns: Narrative, Local Knowledge, and the Changed Context of Folklore.” The Journal of American Folklore 128(508): 125145. DOI: 10.5406/jamerfolk.128.508.0125
  20. Grace, Emma, Parimala Raghavendra, Lareen Newman, Denise Wood, and Tim Connell. 2014. “Learning to use the Internet and on-line social media: What is the effectiveness of home-based intervention for youth with complex communication needs?” Child Language Teaching and Therapy 30: 141157. DOI: 10.1177/0265659013518565
  21. Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  22. Haller, Beth. 2010. Representing Disability in an Ableist World: Essays on Mass Media. Louisville, KY: The Advocado Press.
  23. Halvorsen, Rune, Björn Hvinden, Julie Beadle Brown, Mario Biggeri, Jan Tössebro, and Anne Waldschmidt. 2017. Understanding the lived experiences of persons with disabilities in nine countries: Active Citizenship and Disability in Europe (2nd volume). London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315623924
  24. Hampton, Keith, Lauren Sessions Goulet, Lee Rainie, and Kristen Purcell. 2011. “Social networking sites and our lives.” Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
  25. Hayes, Arthur S., Jane B. Singer, and Jerry Ceppos. 2007. “Shifting Roles, Enduring Values: The Credible Journalist in a Digital Age.” Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22(4): 262279. DOI: 10.1080/08900520701583545
  26. Hill, Simon. 2013. Digital Revolutions: Activism in the Internet Age. Oxford: New Internationalist.
  27. Hindman, Matthew. 2009. The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400837496
  28. Howard, Philip N., Aiden Duffy, Deen Freelon, Muzammil M. Hussain, Will Mari, and Marwa Mazaid. 2011. Opening closed regimes: What was the role of social media during the Arab Spring? Seattle: University of Washington, Project on Information Technology and Political Islam. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2595096. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2595096
  29. Ineland, Jens. 2016. “Hybrid structures and cultural diversity in welfare services for people with intellectual disabilities. The case of inclusive education and disability arts in Sweden.” ALTER, European Journal of Disability Research 10(4): 289300. DOI: 10.1016/j.alter.2016.06.002
  30. Ineland, Jens, and Jan Hjelte. 2017. “Knowing, being or doing? A comparative study on human service professionals’ perceptions of quality in day-to-day encounters with clients with intellectual disabilities.” Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 22(3): 246261. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1744629517694705
  31. Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
  32. Johansson, Anna. 2013. “‘Låt dom aldrig slå ner dig.’: Bloggen som arena för patientaktivism.” Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 34, 203221.
  33. Johnson, Mark. 2019. “Inclusion and exclusion in the digital economy: Disability and mental health as a live streamer on Twitch.tv.” Information, Communication & Society 22(4): 506520. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1476575
  34. Khamis, Susie, Lawrence Ang, and Raymond Welling. 2017. “Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’ and the rise of Social Media Influencers.” Celebrity Studies 8(2): 191208. DOI: 10.1080/19392397.2016.1218292
  35. Khondker, Habibul Hague. 2011. “Role of the New Media in the Arab Spring.” Globalization 8(5): 675679. DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2011.621287
  36. Lathouwers, Karen, Jan de Moor, and Robert Didden. 2009. “Access to and use of Internet by adolescents who have a physical disability: A comparative study.” Research In Developmental Disabilities 30(4): 702711. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2008.09.003
  37. Lievrouw, Leah. 2011. Alternative and Activist New Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  38. Lindgren, Simon, and Coppélie Cocq. 2016. “Turning the Inside Out: Social Media and the Broadcasting of Indigenous Discourse”. European Journal of Communication 32(2): 131150. DOI: 10.1177/0267323116674112
  39. Lindgren, Simon, and Fredrik Palm. 2011. Textometrica service package. Retrieved from http://textometrica.humlab.umu.se/.
  40. MedieAkademiens Twitterbarometer 2016. accessible at https://medieakademien.se/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/2016_Medieakademin_Twitterbarometern.pdf.
  41. Molin, Martin, Emma Sorbring, and Lotta Löfgren-Mårtenson. 2015. “Teachers’ and parents’ views on the Internet and social media usage by pupils with intellectual disabilities.” Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 19(1): 2233. DOI: 10.1177/1744629514563558
  42. Morozov, Evgeny. 2011. The net delusion: The dark side of internet freedom. New York: Public Affairs.
  43. Moser, Ingunn. 2006. “Disability and the promises of technology: Technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal.” Information, Communication & Society 9(3): 373395. DOI: 10.1080/13691180600751348
  44. Palmer Susan, B., Michael L. Wehmeyer, and Daniel K. Davies. 2012. “Family members’ reports of the technology use of family members with intellectual and developmental disabilities.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 56(4): 402414. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01489.x
  45. Parsons, Sarah, Harry Daniels, Jill Porter, and Christopher Robertson. 2008. “Resources, staff beliefs and organizational culture: Factors in the use of information and communication technology for adults with intellectual disabilities.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 21: 1933.
  46. Pearson, C., and F. Trevisan. 2015. “Disability activism in the new media ecology: Campaigning strategies in the digital era.” Disability & Society 30(6): 924940. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2015.1051516
  47. Pinchevski, Amit, and John Durham Peters. 2015. “Autism and new media: Disability between technology and society.” New Media & Society 18(11): 25072523. DOI: 10.1177/1461444815594441
  48. Raghavendra, Parimala, Lareen Newman, Emma Grace, and Denise Wood. 2013. “‘I could never do that before’: Effectiveness of a tailored Internet support intervention to increase the social participation of youth with disabilities.” Child Care Health and Development 39(4): 552561. DOI: 10.1111/cch.12048
  49. Raghavendra, Parimala, Lareen Newman, Emma Grace, and Denise Wood. 2015. “Enhancing social participation in young people with communication disabilities living in rural Australia: outcomes of a home-based intervention for using social media.” Disability and Rehabilitation 37(17): 15761590. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1052578
  50. Rainie, Harrison, and Barry Wellman. 2012. Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/8358.001.0001
  51. Rheingold, Howard. 1994. The Virtual Community: Finding Connection in a Computerized World. London: Secker & Warburg.
  52. Riquelme, Fabian, and Pablo González-Cantergiani. 2016. “Measuring user influence on Twitter: A survey.” Information Processing and Management 52(5): 949975. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2016.04.003
  53. Sallafranque-St-Louis, Francois, and Claude L. Normand. 2017. “From solitude to solicitation: How people with intellectual disability or autism spectrum disorder use the internet.” Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 11(1/7). DOI: 10.5817/CP2017-1-7
  54. Scholz, Frederike, Betul Yalcin, and Marc Priestley. 2017. “Internet access for disabled people: Understanding socio-relational factors in Europe.” Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 11(1/4). DOI: 10.5817/CP2017-1-4
  55. Sépulchre, Marie. 2018. “Tensions and unity in the struggle for citizenship: Swedish disability rights activists claim ‘Full Participation! Now!’.” Disability & Society 33(4): 539561. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2018.1440194
  56. Servaes, Jan. 1999. Communication for Development: One World, Multiple Cultures. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  57. Servaes, Jan. 2000. Walking on the Other Side of the Information Highway: Communication, Culture and Development in the 21st Century. Penang, Malaysia: Southbound.
  58. SFS, 1993:387. Act Concerning Support and Services for Persons with Certain Functional Impairments. Stockholm: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs.
  59. SFS, 2003:460. Act Concerning Ethical Review of Research Involving Humans, Stockholm, Ministry of Education.
  60. Steinfeld, Charles, Nicole B. Ellison, and Cliff Lampe. 2008. “Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: a longitudinal analysis.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29(6): 434445. DOI: 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.002
  61. Svenskarna och internet. 2016. [The Swedes and the internet], accessible at https://www.iis.se/docs/Svenskarna_och_internet_2016.pdf.
  62. Thackeray, Rosemary, and MaryAnne Hunter. 2010. “Empowering Youth: Use of Technology in Advocacy to Affect Social Change.” Journal of Computer-mediated Communications 15(4): 575591. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01503.x
  63. Tøssebro, Jan. 2016. “Scandinavian disability policy: From deinstitutionalisation to non-discrimination and beyond.” ALTER, European Journal of Disability Research 10(2): 111123. DOI: 10.1016/j.alter.2016.03.003
  64. United Nations. 2007. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Accessed August 16, 2018. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html.
  65. van Toorn, Georgia, and Karen Soldatic. 2015. “Disability, rights realization, and welfare provisioning: What is it about Sweden?” Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 2(2): 109115. DOI: 10.1080/23297018.2015.1089185
  66. Wilkins, Karin G. 2000. Redeveloping Communication for Social Change: Theory, Practice and Power. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.591 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 238 - 249
Submitted on: Aug 29, 2018
Accepted on: Sep 6, 2019
Published on: Sep 24, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2019 Jens Ineland, Stefan Gelfgren, Coppélie Cocq, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.