‘He Is, After All, a Young Man’: Claiming Ordinary Lives for Young Adults with Profound Intellectual Disabilities
By: Reetta Mietola and Simo Vehmas
References
- Atkinson, Paul, and Amanda Coffey. 2002.
“Revisiting the relationship between participant observation and interviewing.” In Handbook of Interview Research, Jaber Gubrium & James Holstain (eds.), 801–814. Thousand Oaks: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781412973588.n46 - Baron, Stephen, Sheila Riddell, and Alastair Wilson. 1999. “The Secret of Eternal Youth: Identity, risk and learning difficulties.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 20(4): 483–499. DOI: 10.1080/01425699995227
- Bergmann, Jörg R. 1998. “Introduction: Morality in Discourse.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(3&4): 279–294. DOI: 10.1080/08351813.1998.9683594
- Bigby, C., T. Clement, J. Mansell, and J. Beadle-Brown. 2009. “‘It’s Pretty Hard with Our Ones, They Can’t Talk, the More Able-bodied Can Participate’: Staff Attitudes about the Applicability of Disability Policies to People with Severe and Profound Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 23(4): 363–376. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01154.x
- Bjarnason, Dóra. 2002. “Young Adults with Disabilities in Iceland: The Importance of Relationships and Natural Supports.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 4(2): 156–189. DOI: 10.1080/15017410209510790
- Clegg, Jennifer, Elizabeth Murphy, Kathryn Almack, and Anna Harvey. 2008. “Tensions Around Inclusion: Reframing the Moral Horizon.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 21: 81–94.
- Culham, Andrew, and Melanie Nind. 2003. “Deconstructing Normalisation: Clearing the Way for Inclusion.” Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities 28(1): 65–78. DOI: 10.1080/1366825031000086902
- Forster, Sheridan. 2010. “Age-appropriateness: Enabler or Barrier to a Good Life for People with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities.” Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 35(2): 129–131. DOI: 10.3109/13668251003694606
- Gauthier-Boudreault, Camille, Frances Gallagher, and Mélanie Couture. 2017. “Specific Needs of Families of Young Adults with Profound Intellectual Disability During and After Transition to Adulthood: What are We Missing?” Research in Developmental Disabilities 66(July 2017): 16–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.05.001
- Honkatukia, Päivi. 2017. “Nuorisotutkimuksen yhteiskunnallinen tehtävä” [The societal task of youth research]. Nuorisotutkimus 35(5): 59–64.
- Hudson, Bob. 2006. “Making and Missing Connections: Learning Disability Services and the Transition from Adolescence to Adulthood.” Disability & Society 21(1): 47–60. DOI: 10.1080/09687590500375366
- Johnson, Kelley, and Jan Walmsley (with Marie Wolfe). 2010. People with Intellectual Disabilities: Towards a Good Life. Bristol: Policy Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt9qgs22
- Kauppila, Aarno, Reetta Mietola, and Anna-Maija Niemi. 2018.
“Koulutususkon rajoilla: koulutuksen julma lupaus kehitys- ja vaikeavammaisille opiskelijoille.” [The cruel optimism of education policy and people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities.] In: Koulutuksen lupaukset ja koulutususko, edited by Heikki Silvennnoinen, Mira Kalalahti, & Janne Varjo, Jyväskylä: FERA Suomen Kasvatustieteellinen Seura, 209–240. - Kohli, Martin. 2007. “The Institutionalization of the Life Course: Looking Back and Look Ahead.” Research in Human Development 4(3–4): 253–271. DOI: 10.1080/15427600701663122
- Laz, Sheryl. 1998. “Act Your Age.” Sociological Forum 13(1): 85–113. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022160015408
- Mietola, Reetta. 2018.
“Koko elämä palveluissa: vaikeasti kehitysvammaisen henkilön nuoruus ja elämänkulku kehitysvammapalveluissa.” [Whole life in services: youth and life course of a person with profound intellectual disabilities in the intellectual disability service system]. In: Nuoret palveluiden pauloissa. Nuorten elinolot – vuosikirja 2018, edited by Mika Gissler, Marjatta Kekkonen & Päivi Känkänen, Helsinki: Nuorisotutkimusverkosto, Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos THL & Valtion nuorisoasiain neuvottelukunta, 136–146. - Mietola, Reetta, Sonja Miettinen and Simo Vehmas. 2017. “Voiceless Subjects: Research Ethics and Persons with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20(3): 263–274. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2017.1287872
- Morris, Jenny. 1999. Hurtling into a Void: Transition to Adulthood for Young Disabled People with Complex Health and Support Needs. Brighton: Pavilion Publishing.
- Niemi, Anna-Maija, and Reetta Mietola. 2017. “Between Hopes and Possibilities: (Special) Educational Paths, Agency and Subjectivities.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 19(3): 218–229. DOI: 10.1080/15017419.2016.1239588
- Nikander, Pirjo. 2000. “‘Old’ vs. ‘Little Girl’: A Discursive Approach to Age Categorization and Morality.” Journal of Aging Studies 14(4): 335–358. DOI: 10.1016/S0890-4065(00)80001-8
- Nirje, Bengt. 1969.
“The Normalization Principle and its Human Management Implications.” In Changing Patterns in Residential Services for the Mentally Retarded, edited by R. Kugel, and W. Wolfensberger, 179–195. Washington, D.C.: President’s Committee on Mental Retardation. - Nirje, Bengt. 1970. “I–The Normalization Principle–Implications and Comments.” Journal of Mental Subnormality 16: 62–70. DOI: 10.1179/bjms.1970.013
- Parry Hughes, R., M. Redley, and H. Ring. 2011. “Friendship and Adults with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities and English Disability Policy.” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 8(3): 197–206. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-1130.2011.00310.x
- Priestley, Mark. 2003. Disability: A Life Course Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Silverman, David. 2001. Interpeting Qualitative Data. Methods for Analyzing Text, Talk and Interaction. London: Sage.
- Simpson, Murray K. 2018. “Power, Ideology and Structure: The Legacy of Normalization for Intellectual Disability.” Social Inclusion 6(2): 12–21. DOI: 10.17645/si.v6i2.1264
- Tamboukou, M. 2008.
“A Foucauldian Approach to Narratives.” In Doing Narrative Research, edited by M. Andrews, C. Squire, and M. Tamboukou, 103–121. London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9780857024992.d8 - Widdicombe, Sue. 1998.
“‘But You Don›t Class Yourself’ The Interactional Management of Category Membership and Non-membership” . In Identities in Talk, edited by Charles Antaki and Sue Widdicombe, 52–70. London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781446216958.n4 - Wolfensberger, Wolf. 1972. The Principle of Normalization in Human Services. Toronto: National Institute of Mental Retardation.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.590 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 120 - 128
Submitted on: Aug 6, 2018
Accepted on: May 2, 2019
Published on: May 21, 2019
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2019 Reetta Mietola, Simo Vehmas, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.