Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
‘The More I Use the Technology, I Know What I’m Capable of Doing’: Access and the Discourse of Capacity Cover

‘The More I Use the Technology, I Know What I’m Capable of Doing’: Access and the Discourse of Capacity

Open Access
|Aug 2019

References

  1. Anzaldua, Gloria. 1987. Borderlands, La Frontera: The New Mestiza. 3rd edition. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
  2. Artiles, Alfredo J., Beth Harry, Daniel J. Reschly, and Phillip C. Chinn. 2010. “Overidentification of Students of Color in Special Education: A Critical Overview.” Multicultural Perspectives, 4(1): 310. DOI: 10.1207/S15327892MCP0401_2
  3. Biklen, Douglas. 2005. Autism and the Myth of the Person Alone. New York, NY: NYU Press.
  4. Bjarnason, Dóra. 2009. “Parents and Professionals: An Uneasy Partnership?” In Social Capital, Professionalism and Diversity, edited by Julie Allan, Jenny Ozga, and Geri Smyth, 123137. Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
  5. Bogdan, Robert, and Sari Knopp Biklen. 2007. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  6. Boot, Fleur Helen, John Dinsmore, Chapel Khasnabis, and Malcolm MacLachlan. 2017. “Intellectual Disability and Assistive Technology: Opening the GATE Wider.” Frontiers in Public Health, 5: 14. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00010
  7. Bouck, Emily C. 2016. “A National Snapshot of Assistive Technology for Students with Disabilities.” Journal of Special Education Technology, 3(1): 413. DOI: 10.1177/0162643416633330
  8. Bouck, Emily C., and Sara Flanagan. 2009. “Assistive Technology and Mathematics: What is There and Where Can We Go in Special Education.” Journal of Special Education Technology, 24(2): 1730. DOI: 10.1177/016264340902400202
  9. Davis, Lennard J. 2013. The Disability Studies Reader. 4th ed. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203077887
  10. Edyburn, Dave L. 2004. “Rethinking Assistive Technology.” Special Education Technology Practice, 5(4): 1623.
  11. Erevelles, Nirmala. 2011. Disability and Difference in Global Contexts: Enabling a Transformative Body Politic. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  12. Ferguson, Dianne L., and Diane Baumgart. 1991. Partial participation revisited. JASH, 16(4): 218227. DOI: 10.1177/154079699101600405
  13. Foley, Alan, and Beth A. Ferri. 2012. “Technology for People, Not Disabilities: Ensuring Access and Inclusion.” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(4): 192200. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01230.x
  14. Gabel, Susan L. 2005. Disability Studies in Education: Readings in Theory and Method. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
  15. Gallagher, Deborah, Lous Heshusius, Richard P. Iano, and Thomas M. Skrtic. 2006. Challenging Orthodoxy in Special Education: Dissenting Voices. Denver, CO: Love Publishing.
  16. Green, Sara E. 2015. “Staying True to Their Stories: Interviews with Parents of Children with Disabilities.” In Disability and Qualitative Inquiry: Methods for Rethinking an Ableist World, edited by Ronald J. Berger, and Laura S. Lorenz, 5774. New York, NY: Routledge.
  17. Guillemin, Marilys. 2005. “Technologies, Deafness, and Critical Compromise.” Disability Studies Quarterly, 25(3). Retrieved from http://www.dsq-sds.org. DOI: 10.18061/dsq.v25i3.587
  18. Hamraie, Aimi. 2013. “Designing Collective Access: A Feminist Disability Theory of Universal Design.” Disability Studies Quarterly, 33(4). DOI: 10.18061/dsq.v33i4.3871
  19. Hamraie, Aimi. 2017. Building Access: Universal Design and the Politics of Disability. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. DOI: 10.5749/minnesota/9781517901639.001.0001
  20. Haraway, Donna. 2014. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” In Just Methods: An Interdisciplinary Feminist Reader, edited by Alison M. Jaggar, 346352. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
  21. Harper, Kelly A., Kristin Kurtzworth-Keen, and Michele A. Marable. 2017. “Assistive Technology for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Glimpse of the Livescribe Pen and Its Impact on Homework Completion.” Education and Informational Technologies, 22(5): 24712483. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-016-9555-0
  22. Hart, Susan, Annabelle Dixon, Mary Jane Drummond, and Donald McIntyre. 2004. Learning without Limits. New York, NY: Open University Press.
  23. Harvey, David. 2013. Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. New York, NY: Verso.
  24. Holland, Dorothy, William Lachiotte, Debra Skinner, and Carole Cain. 1998. Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  25. Hollins, K. G. 2017. “Assistive Technology, Disability, and Access: Transforming Thinking and Practice Through Inquiry-Based Professional Development.” EdD diss., Columbia Teachers College. (Order No. 10257418). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1906272624). Retrieved from http://eduproxy.tc-library.org/?url=/docview/1906272624?accountid=14258.
  26. Jeffs, Tara, Michael Behrmann, and Brenda Bannan-Ritland. 2006. “Assistive Technology and Literacy Learning: Reflections of Children and Parents.” Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(1): 3744. DOI: 10.1177/016264340602100104
  27. Kafer, Alison. 2013. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  28. Kennedy, Michael J., and Donald D. Deshler. 2010. “Literacy Instruction, Technology, and Students with Learning Disabilities: Research We Have and Research We Need.” Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(4): 289298. DOI: 10.1177/073194871003300406
  29. Kim, Jeon-Hee. 2015. Understanding Narrative Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  30. King-Sears, Margaret Elaine, and Anna S. Evmenova. 2007. “Premises, Principles, and Processes for Integrating Technology into Instruction.” TEACHING Exceptional Children, 40(1): 614. DOI: 10.1177/004005990704000101
  31. King-Sears, Margaret Elaine, Christopher Swanson, and Lynne Mainzer. 2011. “TECHnology and Literacy for Adolescents with Disabilities.” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 54: 569578. DOI: 10.1598/JAAL.54.8.2
  32. Kiuppis, Florian, and Rune Sarromaa Hausstätter. 2014. Inclusive Education: Twenty Years after Salamanca. New York: Peter Lang.
  33. Kliewer, Christopher, and Douglas Biklen. 2007. “Enacting Literacy: Local Understanding, Significant Disability, and a New Frame for Educational Opportunity.” Teachers College Record, 109(12): 25792600.
  34. Kliewer, Christopher, Douglas Biklen, and Amy Petersen. 2015. “At the End of Intellectual Disability.” Harvard Educational Review, 85(1): 128. DOI: 10.17763/haer.85.1.j260u3gv2402v576
  35. Kozleski, Elizabeth B., Petra Engelbrecht, Roby Hess, Estelle Swart, Irma Eloff, Marietije Oswald, A. Molina, and Swati Jain. 2008. “Where Differences Matter: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Family Voice in Special Education. The Journal of Special Education, 42(1): 2635. DOI: 10.1177/0022466907313606
  36. Lalvani, Priya. 2015. “Disability, Stigma and Otherness: Perspectives of Parents and Teachers.” International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 62(4): 379393. DOI: 10.1080/1034912X.2015.1029877
  37. Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. Cambridge, MA.
  38. Lukin, Josh. 2013. “Disability and Blackness.” In Disability Studies Reader, edited by Lennard J. Davis, 308315. New York: Routledge.
  39. Maccini, Paula, Joseph Calvin Gagnon, and Charles A. Hughes. 2002. “Technology-based Practices for Secondary Students with Learning Disabilities.” Learning Disability Quarterly, 25(4): 247261. DOI: 10.2307/1511356
  40. Maor, Dorit, Jan Currie, and Rachel Drewry. 2011. “The Effectiveness of Assistive Technologies for Children with Special Needs: A Review of Research-based Studies.” European Journal of Special Needs Education, 26(3): 283298. DOI: 10.1080/08856257.2011.593821
  41. Massey, Doreen. 1994. “Double Articulation: A Place in the World.” In Displacements: Cultural Identities in Questions, edited by Angelica Bammer. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  42. Massey, Doreen. 2005. For Space. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  43. Mayer, Richard E. 2009. Multimedia Learning. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  44. McLaren, Elizabeth M., Margaret E. Bausch, and Melinda Jones Ault. 2007. “Collaboration Strategies Reported by Teachers Providing Assistive Technology Services.” Journal of Special Education Technology, 22(4): 1629. DOI: 10.1177/016264340702200402
  45. Miles, Matthew B., Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldana. 2013. Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  46. Moser, Ingunn, and John Law. 1999. “Good Passages, Bad Passages.” The Sociological Review, 47(1): 196219. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03489.x
  47. Oliver, Michael. 1990. The Politics of Disablement. London: Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-20895-1
  48. Oliver, Michael, and Colin Barnes. 1998. Disabled People and Social Policy: From Exclusion to Inclusion. London: Longman.
  49. Ong-Dean, Colin. 2009. Distinguishing Disability: Parents, Privilege and Special Education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226630021.001.0001
  50. Polgar, J. M. 2010. “The Myth of Neutral Technology.” In Design and Use of Assistive Technology: Social, Technical, Ethical, and Economic Challenges, edited by Meeko Mitsuko K. Oishi, Ian M. Mitchell, and H. F. Machier Van der Loos, 1724. New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7031-2_2
  51. Polkinghorne, Donald E. 1995. “Narrative Configuration in Qualitative Analysis.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1): 523. DOI: 10.1080/0951839950080103
  52. Sheldon, Alison. 2004. “Changing Technology.” In Disabling Barriers—Enabling Environments, edited by John Swain, Sally French, Colin Barnes, and Carol Thomas, 2nd ed., 155160. London: Sage.
  53. Shepley, Collin, Justin D. Lane, Kevin Ayres, and Karen Douglas. 2015. “Assistive and Technology Instruction: Understanding the Differences to Enhance Programming and Teaching.” Young Exceptional Children, 20(2): 8698. DOI: 10.1177/1096250615603436
  54. Siebers, Tobin. 2008. Disability Theory. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  55. Soja, Edward W. 1989. Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso.
  56. Soja, Edward W. 1996. Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-And-Imagined Places. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  57. Titchkosky, Tanya. 2011. The Question of Access: Disability, Space, Meaning. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press.
  58. Wehmeyer, Michael L., Sean J. Smith, Susan B. Palmer, and Daniel K. Davies. 2004. “Technology Use by Students with Intellectual Disabilities: An Overview.” Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(4): 721. DOI: 10.1177/016264340401900402
  59. Yell, Mitchell L. 2011. The Law and Special Education. New Jersey: Pearson.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.589 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 207 - 217
Submitted on: Aug 1, 2018
Accepted on: Aug 8, 2019
Published on: Aug 30, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2019 Srikala Naraian, Katherine Newhouse, Rae Leeper, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.