Guardianship for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: Accountant, Advocate or ‘Family’ Member?
By: Lottie Giertz
References
- Arstein-Kerslake, Anna. 2014. “An empowering dependency: Exploring support for the exercise of legal capacity.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 18: 1.
- Barnes, Colin, Geof Mercer, and Tom Shakespeare. 1999. Exploring Disability: A Sociological Introduction. Oxford: Polity Press.
- Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using thematic analysis in psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 11–101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Carney, Terry. 2012.
“Guardianship, ‘social’ citizenship and theorizing substitute decision-making law.” In: Beyond Elder Law: New Directions in Law and Ageing, edited by Israel Doron, and Ann M. Soden, 1–17. Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-25972-2_1 - Creswell, John W. 2011. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. New York: Merrill Prentice Hall.
- Devi, Nandine, Jerome Bickenbach, and Gerold Stucki. 2011. “Moving towards substituted or supported decision-making? Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” ALTER – European Journal of Disability Research 5(4): 249–264. DOI: 10.1016/j.alter.2011.07.002
- Doron, Israel. 2002. “Elder guardianship kaleidoscope – a comparative perspective.” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 16: 368–398. DOI: 10.1093/lawfam/16.3.368
- Flynn, Ellionoir. 2010. “A socio-legal analysis of advocacy for people with disabilities – competing concepts of ‘best interests’ and empowerment in legislation and policy on statutory advocacy services.” Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law 32(1): 23–36. DOI: 10.1080/09649061003675840
- Flynn, Ellionoir, and Anna Arstein-Kerslak. 2014. “The support model of legal capacity: Fact, fiction, or fantasy?” Berkeley Journal of International Law 32(1): 124–143.
- Fridström Montoya, Therese. 2015. Leva som andra genom ställföreträdare – en rättslig och faktisk paradox. [To Live Like Others Through Legal Representation – A Legal and Factual Paradox]. PhD diss. Uppsala University.
- Giertz, Lottie. 2008. Ideal och vardag. Inflytande och självbestämmande med personlig assistans. [Ideal and Everyday Life. Influence and Self-determination with Personal Assistance] Växjö: Växjö universitet SA 2008: 4.
- Giertz, Lottie. 2012. Erkännande, makt och möten – en studie av inflytande och själv-bestämmande med LSS. [Recognition, Relations and Power – a Study of Influence and Self-determination with LSS] PhD diss. Linnaeus University.
- Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Hamondsworth: Penguin Ltd.
- Harpur, Paul. 2012. “Embracing the new disability rights paradigm: The importance of the conv. on the rights of persons with disabilities.” Disability & Society 27(1): 1–14. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2012.631794
- Heller, Tamar, Abigail Schindler, Susan B. Palmer, Michael Wehmeyer, Wendy Parent, Ronda Jenson, Brian H. Abery, Wendy Geringer, Ansley Bacon, and David M. O’Hara. 2011. “Self-determination across the life span: Issues and gaps.” Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal 19: 31–45. DOI: 10.1080/09362835.2011.537228
- Honneth, Axel. 2003.
“Redistribution as recognition: A response to Nancy Fraser.” In: Redistribution and Recognition? A political– Philosophical Exchange, edited by Nancy Fraser, and Axel Honneth. New York: Verso. - Honneth, Axel. 2004. “Recognition and justice: Outline a plural theory of justice.” Acta Sociologica 47(4): 351–364. DOI: 10.1177/0001699304048668
- Jergeby, Ulla, and Haluk Soydan. 2002. “Assessment processes in social work practice when children are at risk: A comparative cross-national vignette study.” Journal of Social Work Research and Evaluation 3(2): 127–144.
- Krogstrup, K. 2003. Evalueringsmodeller. [Evaluation models.] Arhus: Systime Academic.
- Lewin, Barbro. 1998. Funktionshinder och medborgarskap. [Disability and citizenship, summery in English] PhD diss. Uppsala University.
- Mégret, Fredéric. 2008. “The Disabilities Convention: Towards a Holistic Concept of Rights.” The International Journal of Human Rights 12(2): 261–278. DOI: 10.1080/13642980801954363
- Millar, Dorothy S. 2007. “‘I never put it together’: The disconnect between self-determination and guardianship – implications for practice.” Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities 42(2): 119–129.
- Millar, Dorothy S. 2013. “Guardianship alternatives: Their use affirms self-determination of individuals with intellectual disabilities.” Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities 48(3): 291–305.
- Odlöw, Torbjörn. 2005. Ställföreträdare för vuxna – kamrer eller handledare? [Guardian of Incapable Adults – Accountant or Supervisor?] PhD diss. Stockholm: Jure.
- Olin, Elisabeth, and Bibbi Ringsby Jansson. 2006. Risk eller möjlighet: Om styrning och inflytande i mötet mellan unga med funktionshinder och välfärdssamhällets aktörer [Risk or possibility: Meetings between young people with disabilities and professionells] Högskolan Väst: 2006: 04.
- Patel, Dilip R., Donald E. Greydanus, and Joav Merrick. 2014. Intellectual Disability: Some Current Issues. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
- Payne-Christiansen, Erin M., and Patricia L. Sitlington. 2008. “Guardianship: Its role in the transition process for students with developmental disabilities.” Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities 43(1): 3–19.
- Quinn, Gerard, and Anna Arstein-Kerslake. 2012.
“Restoring the ‘human rights’: Personhood and doctrinal innovation in the UN disability convention.” In: The Cambridge Companion to Human Rights Law, edited by Conor Gearty, and Costas Douzinas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CCO9781139060875.005 - Schalock, Robert, Sharon A. Borthwick-Duffy, Valerie Bradley, Wil Buntinx, David Coulter, Ellis Craig, Sharon Gomez, Yves Lachapelle, Ruth Luckasson, Alya Reeve, Karrie Shogren, Martha Snell, Scott Spreat, Marc Tassé, James Thompson, Miguel Verdugo-Alonso, Michael Wehmeyer, and Mark Yeager. 2010. Intellectual Disability: Definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports. Eleventh ed. Washington: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
- Schmidt, Winsor. 2014.
“Proxy decison-making. A legal perspective.” In: The Law and Ethics of Dementia, edited by Charles Foster, Jonathan Herring, and Israel Doron. Oxford: Hart. - Smebye, Kari, Marit Kirkevold, and Knut Engedal. 2012. “How do persons with dementia participate in decision-making related to health and daily care? A multi-case study.” BioMedical Central Health Services Research 12: 241. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-241
- SFS. 1949: 381. Föräldrabalken [Parental Code].
- SFS. 1993: 387. Lag om stöd och service till vissa funktionshindrade [Act Concerning Support and Service for Persons with certain Functional Impairments].
- SFS. 2003: 460. Lag om etikprövning av forskning som rör människor. [Act Concerning Ethical Aprovement of Research concerning Human Beings].
- Taylor, Charles. 1994.
“The Politics of Recognition.” In: Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, edited by A. Gutmann, 25–73. Princeton: Princeton University Press. - UN General Assembly. 2006. “Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities.” A/61/611.
- Wehmayer, Michael, and N. Bolding. 2001. “Enhanced self-determination of adults with intellectual disability as an outcome of moving to community-based work or living environments.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 44: 371–383. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2001.00342.x
- Wright, Jennifer. 2010. “Guardianship for your own good: Improving the well-being of respondents and principals.” USA International Journal of Law and Psychiatric 33(201): 350–368. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.09.007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.40 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 256 - 265
Submitted on: Jun 14, 2017
Accepted on: Jun 14, 2017
Published on: Jun 11, 2018
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2018 Lottie Giertz, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.