A Response to Watermeyer and Harvey (2025)
References
- Barnes, Colin. 2012.
“Understanding the social model of disability: Past, present and future.” In Routledge handbook of disability studies, edited by Nick Watson, Alan Roulstone, and Carol Thomas, 12–29. London and New York: Routledge. - Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
- Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York and London: Routledge.
- Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York and London: Routledge.
- Feely, Michael. 2016. “Disability studies after the ontological turn: A return to the material world and material bodies without a return to essentialism.” Disability & Society 31 (7): 863–883. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2016.1208603
- Foucault, Michel. 1972. Archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge.
- Galvin, Rose. 2003. “The function of language in the creation and liberation of disabled identities: From Saussure to contemporary strategies of government.” Australian Journal of Communication 30 (3): 83–100.
https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/aeipt.133047 - Goodley, Dan. 2014. Dis/ability studies: Theorising disablism and ableism. London and New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203366974
- Goodley, Dan, and Katherine Runswick-Cole. 2013. “The body as disability and possability: Theorizing the ‘leaking, lacking and excessive’ bodies of disabled children.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 15 (1): 1–19. DOI: 10.1080/15017419.2011.640410
- Hickey-Moody, Anna. 2009. Unimaginable bodies: Intellectual disability, performance and becomings. Rotterdam: Sense. DOI: 10.1163/9789087908553
- Hughes, Bill. 2009. “Wounded/monstrous/abject: A critique of the disabled body in the sociological imaginary.” Disability & Society 24 (4): 399–410. DOI: 10.1080/09687590902876144
- Hughes, Bill, and Kevin Paterson. 1997. “The social model of disability and the disappearing body: Towards a sociology of impairment.” Disability & Society 12 (3): 325–340. DOI: 10.1080/09687599727209
- Shakespeare, Tom. 2013. Disability rights and wrongs revisited. 2nd edn. London and New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315887456
- Shildrick, Margrit. 2012.
“Critical disability studies: Rethinking the conventions for the age of postmodernity.” In Routledge handbook of disability studies, edited by Nick Watson, Alan Roulstone, and Carol Thomas, 30–41. London and New York: Routledge. - Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1988. Inessential women: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston: Beacon Books.
- Thorneycroft, Ryan. 2020. Reimagining disablist and ableist violence as abjection. New York and London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429347887
- Thorneycroft, Ryan. 2024. “Screwing the social model of disability.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 26 (1): 286–299. DOI: 10.16993/sjdr.1130
- Tremain, Shelley. 2001. “On the government of disability.” Social Theory and Practice 27 (4): 617–636. DOI: 10.5840/soctheorpract200127432
- Vehmas, Simo, and Pekka Mäkelä. 2008. “A realist account of the ontology of impairment.” Journal of Medical Ethics 34: 93–95. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2006.019042
- Vehmas, Simo, and Pekka Mäkelä. 2009.
“The ontology of disability and impairment: A discussion of the natural and social features.” In Arguing about disability: Philosophical perspectives, edited by Kristjana Kristiansen, Simo Vehmas, and Tom Shakespeare, 42–56. London and New York: Routledge. - Watermeyer, Brian, and Clare Harvey. 2025. “Screwing with our embodiment: A response to Thorneycroft’s reimagining of the social model.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 27 (1): 565–577. DOI: 10.16993/sjdr.1342
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.1396 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 741 - 745
Submitted on: Oct 28, 2025
Accepted on: Nov 20, 2025
Published on: Dec 4, 2025
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2025 Ryan Thorneycroft, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.