Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Operationalizing Accessibility: From Strategy to Practice Cover

Operationalizing Accessibility: From Strategy to Practice

Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. AccessibleEU. 2025. “Directive (EU) 2019/882 Comes into Effect in June 2025. Are You Ready?” European Commission. Retrieved from: https://accessible-eu-centre.ec.europa.eu/content-corner/news/eaa-comes-effect-june-2025-are-you-ready-2025-01-31_en.
  2. Ara, Jinat, Cecilia Sik-Lanyi, and Arpad Kelemen. 2024. “Accessibility Engineering in Web Evaluation Process: A Systematic Literature Review.” Universal Access in the Information Society 23(2): 653686. DOI: 10.1007/s10209-023-00967-2
  3. Baudet, Cédric, Maximiliano Jeanneret Medina, and Cédric Benoit. 2024. “Widen Your Vision: From Technical Accessibility to Semantic Intelligibility of Information.” Universal Access in the Information Society 23(3): 13891407. DOI: 10.1007/s10209-022-00963-y
  4. Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(February): 77101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  5. Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2019. “Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11(4): 589597. DOI: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
  6. Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2021. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications Ltd.
  7. Coverdale, Andy, Sarah Lewthwaite, and Sarah Horton. 2022. “Teaching Accessibility as a Shared Endeavour: Building Capacity across Academic and Workplace Contexts.” Proceedings of the 19th International Web for All Conference, April 25, 4: 15. DOI: 10.1145/3493612.3520451
  8. Darcy, Simon, and Dimitrios Buhalis. 2011. “Conceptualising Disability.” Accessible Tourism: Concepts and Issues 45. DOI: 10.2307/jj.29308438.7
  9. Drouet, Luce, Froukje Sleeswijk Visser, and Carine Lallemand. 2023. “Using Empathy-Centric Design in Industry: Reflections from the UX Researcher, the Client, and the Method Expert.” Proceedings of the 2nd Empathy-Centric Design Workshop, April 23, 10: 19. DOI: 10.1145/3588967.3589130
  10. ETSI, European Committee for Standardization (CEN), and European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC). 2021. Accessibility Requirements for ICT Products and Services. Standard EN 301 549. V3.2.1. European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI).
  11. European Council. 2021. “Disability in the EU: Facts and Figures.” https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/infographics/disability-eu-facts-figures/.
  12. European Union. 2019. “Directive (EU) 2019/882 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the Accessibility Requirements for Products and Services (European Accessibility Act).” Official Journal of the European Union.
  13. Goodley, Dan. 2014. Dis/Ability Studies. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203366974
  14. Goodley, Dan, Rebecca Lawthom, Kirsty Liddiard, and Katherine Runswick-Cole. 2019. “Provocations for Critical Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 34(6): 972997. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2019.1566889
  15. Gregor, Peter, Alan F. Newell, and Mary Zajicek. 2002. “Designing for Dynamic Diversity: Interfaces for Older People.” Proceedings of the Fifth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies, July 8, 151156. DOI: 10.1145/638249.638277
  16. Gulliksen, Jan, Bengt Göransson, Inger Boivie, Stefan Blomkvist, Jenny Persson, and Åsa Cajander. 2003. “Key Principles for User-Centred Systems Design.” Behaviour and Information Technology 22(6): 397409. DOI: 10.1080/01449290310001624329
  17. Gulliksen, Jan, Susan Harker, and Gregg Vanderheiden. 2004. “Guidelines, Standards, Methods and Processes for Software Accessibility.” Universal Access in the Information Society 3(1): 15. DOI: 10.1007/s10209-003-0068-4
  18. Henry, Shawn Lawton. 2023. “What’s New in WCAG 2.2.” Retrieved from: https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-22/.
  19. Hillman, Thomas, and Roger Säljö. 2016. “Learning, Knowing and Opportunities for Participation: Technologies and Communicative Practices.” Learning, Media and Technology 41(2): 306309. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2016.1167080
  20. Hussain, Dena, and Jan Gulliksen. 2024. “Accessibility Knowledge Viewed Through the Lens of the Stakeholders.” 325. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-64576-1_1
  21. Izzo, Margaretha Vreeburg, and William M. Bauer. 2015. “Universal Design for Learning: Enhancing Achievement and Employment of STEM Students with Disabilities.” Universal Access in the Information Society 14(1): 1727. DOI: 10.1007/s10209-013-0332-1
  22. Laamanen, Merja, Tarja Ladonlahti, Hannu Puupponen, and Tommi Kärkkäinen. 2024. “Does the Law Matter? An Empirical Study on the Accessibility of Finnish Higher Education Institutions’ Web Pages.” Universal Access in the Information Society 23(1): 475491. DOI: 10.1007/s10209-022-00931-6
  23. Lewthwaite, Sarah, Sarah Horton, and Andy Coverdale. 2022. “Researching Pedagogy in Digital Accessibility Education.” ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing, 134(October): 11. DOI: 10.1145/3582298.3582300
  24. Persson, Hans, Henrik Åhman, Alexander Arvei Yngling, and Jan Gulliksen. 2015. “Universal Design, Inclusive Design, Accessible Design, Design for All: Different Concepts—One Goal? On the Concept of Accessibility—Historical, Methodological and Philosophical Aspects.” Universal Access in the Information Society 14(4): 505526. DOI: 10.1007/s10209-014-0358-z
  25. Roulstone, Alan. 2016. Disability and Technology: An Interdisciplinary and International Approach. Springer.
  26. Säljö, Roger. 2016. “Apps and Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective.” In Apps, Technology and Younger Learners International Evidence for Teaching, edited by Natalia Kucirkova, and Garry Falloon, 1st ed. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315682204
  27. Seixas Pereira, Letícia, and Carlos Duarte. 2025. “Evaluating and Monitoring Digital Accessibility: Practitioners’ Perspectives on Challenges and Opportunities.” Universal Access in the Information Society 24(3): 25532571. DOI: 10.1007/s10209-025-01210-w
  28. Shakespeare, Tom. 2006. Disability Rights and Wrongs. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203640098
  29. Swedish Research Council. 2024. Good Research Practice (Revised Edition). Swedish Research Council.
  30. Tyler, Imogen. 2015. “Dis/Ability Studies: Theorising Disablism and Ableism.” Disability & Society 30(4): 659662. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2015.1014669
  31. W3C. 2023. “Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2.” Retrieved from: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/.
  32. WebAIM. 2025. “The WebAIM Million – The 2025 Report on the Accessibility of the Top 1,000,000 Home Pages.” Retrieved from: https://webaim.org/projects/million/.
  33. Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511803932
  34. Yesilada, Yeliz, and Simon Harper. 2019. “Web Accessibility.” Human–Computer Interaction Series. London: Springer, ahead of print. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.1388 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 403 - 418
Submitted on: Oct 6, 2025
Accepted on: May 6, 2026
Published on: Sep 7, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Ali Mohamed, Jan Gulliksen, Sofia Strömqvist, Masood Rangraz, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.