Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Purpose of Support in the Exercise of Legal Capacity: Article 12 at a Crossroads Cover

The Purpose of Support in the Exercise of Legal Capacity: Article 12 at a Crossroads

Open Access
|Nov 2025

References

  1. Arstein-Kerslake, Anna, Joanne Watson, Michelle Browning, Jonathan Martinis, and Peter Blanck. 2017. “Future directions in supported decision-making.” Disability Studies Quarterly 37 (1). DOI: 10.18061/dsq.v37i1.5070
  2. Bach, Michael, and Lana Kerzner. 2010. “A new paradigm for protecting autonomy and the right to legal capacity.” https://www.lco-cdo.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/disabilities-commissioned-paper-bach-kerzner.pdf
  3. Bartlett, Peter. 2012. “The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and mental health law.” The Modern Law Review 75 (5): 75278. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00923.x
  4. Brosnan, Liz, and Eilionóir Flynn. 2017. “Freedom to negotiate: a proposal extricating ‘capacity’ from ‘consent’.” International Journal of Law in Context 13 (1): 5876. DOI: 10.1017/S1744552316000471
  5. Browning, Michelle, Christine Bigby, and Jacinta Douglas. 2014. “Supported decision making: Understanding how its conceptual link to legal capacity is influencing the development of practice.” Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 1 (1): 3445. DOI: 10.1080/23297018.2014.902726
  6. Carney, Terry, Shih-Ning Then, Christine Bigby, Ilan Wiesel, Jacinta Douglas, and Elizabeth Smith. 2019. “Realising ‘will, preferences and rights’: Reconciling differences on best practice support for decision-making?” Griffith Law Review 28 (4): 357379. DOI: 10.1080/10383441.2019.1690741
  7. Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2014. “General Comment No. 1: Article 12: Equal recognition before the law.” https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/general-comments-and-recommendations/general-comment-no-1-article-12-equal-recognition-1
  8. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Dec. 13, 2006. “2515 U.N.T.S. 3 (entered into force May 3, 2008).”
  9. Craigie, Jillian. 2021. “Conceptualising ‘undue influence’ in decision-making support for people with mental disabilities.” Medical Law Review 29 (1): 4879. DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwaa041
  10. Dawson, John. 2015. “A realistic approach to assessing mental health laws’ compliance with the UNCRPD.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 40: 7079. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.04.003
  11. de Bhailís, Clíona, and Eilionóir Flynn. 2017. “Recognising legal capacity: Commentary and analysis of Article 12 CRPD.” International Journal of Law in Context 13 (1): 621. DOI: 10.1017/S174455231600046X
  12. Dhanda, Amita. 2007. “Legal capacity in the Disability Rights Convention: Stranglehold of the past or lodestar for the future?” Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 34 (2): 42962.
  13. Dhanda, Amita. 2012. “Universal legal capacity as a universal human right.” In Mental health and human rights: Vision, praxis and courage, edited by Michael Dudley, Derrick Silove, and Fran Gale, 177188. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/med/9780199213962.003.0011
  14. Douglas, Jacinta, Christine Bigby, and Elizabeth Smith. 2020. Building capability to support. client decision making. TAC Project No: T005. Melbourne: Living with Disability Research Centre, La Trobe University.
  15. Douglas, Jacinta, Christine Bigby, Lucy Knox, and Michelle Browning. 2015. “Factors that underpin the delivery of effective decision-making support for people with cognitive disability, research and practice.” Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 2 (1): 3744. DOI: 10.1080/23297018.2015.1036769
  16. Duffy, Julia. 2023. Mental capacity, dignity and the power of international human rights. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781009304481
  17. Dute, Joseph. 2015. “Should substituted decision-making be abolished?” European Journal of Health Law 22 (4): 31520. DOI: 10.1163/15718093-12341371
  18. Flynn, Eilionóir. 2019. “The rejection of capacity assessments in favor of respect for will and preferences: The radical promise of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” World Psychiatry 18 (1): 5051. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20605
  19. Flynn, Eilionóir, and Anna Arstein-Kerslake. 2014a. “Legislating personhood: Realising the right to support in exercising legal capacity.” International Journal of Law in Context 10 (1): 81104. DOI: 10.1017/S1744552313000384
  20. Flynn, Eilionóir, and Anna Arstein-Kerslake. 2014b. “The support model of legal capacity: Fact, fiction, or fantasy?” Berkeley Journal of International Law 32: 12443.
  21. Glen, Kristin Booth. 2018. “Introducing a ‘new’ human right: Learning from others, bringing legal capacity home.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 49 (3): 197. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/agispt.20190305007374
  22. Gooding, Piers. 2015. “Navigating the ‘flashing amber lights’ of the right to legal capacity in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Responding to major concerns.” Human Rights Law Review 15 (1): 4571. DOI: 10.1093/hrlr/ngu045
  23. Hosseiny, Hoda. 2025. “On genuine will and genuine self: A critical analysis of ‘will and preferences’ under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” Doctoral thesis, Lund University, Sweden.
  24. Kohn, Nina A., Jeremy A. Blumenthal, and Amy T. Campbell. 2013. “Supported decision-making: A viable alternative to guardianship?” Penn State Law Review 117 (4): 11111157. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2161115
  25. Litins’ka, Yana. 2018. “Assessing capacity to decide on medical treatment: On human rights and the use of medical knowledge in the laws of England, Russia and Sweden.” PhD diss., Uppsala University, Sweden. https://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1257439/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  26. Minkowitz, Tina. 2017. “CRPD and transformative equality.” International Journal of Law in Context 13 (1): 7786. DOI: 10.1017/S1744552316000483
  27. Quinn, Gerald. 2010. “Personhood and legal capacity. Perspectives on the paradigm shift of Article 12 CRPD.” Paper presented at HPOD Conference, Harvard Law School, 20 February.
  28. Salzman, Leslie. 2010. “Rethinking guardianship (again): Substituted decision making as a violation of the integration mandate of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act.” University of Colorado Law Review 81: 157245.
  29. Scholten, Matthé, and Jakov Gather. 2018. “Adverse consequences of Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for Persons with Mental Disabilities and an alternative way forward.” Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (4): 22633. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104414
  30. Series, Lucy. 2018. “Article 12 CRPD: Equal recognition before the law.” In The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A commentary, edited by Ilias Banketas, Michael Ashley Stein, and Dimitris Anastasiou, 339373. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  31. Skowron, Paul. 2019. “Giving substance to ‘the best interpretation of will and preferences’.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 62: 125134. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.12.001
  32. Szmukler, George. 2017. “The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: ‘Rights, will and preferences’ in relation to mental health disabilities.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 54: 9097. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.06.003
  33. Szmukler, George. 2019. “‘Capacity’, ‘best interests’, ‘will and preferences’ and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” World Psychiatry 18 (1): 3441. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20584
  34. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. May 23, 1969. “1155 U.N.T.S. 331 (entered into force January 27, 1980).”
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.1289 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 607 - 618
Submitted on: Mar 31, 2025
Accepted on: Oct 23, 2025
Published on: Nov 12, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Linus Broström, Anna Nilsson, Therése Fridström Montoya, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.