Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Art Work as an Inclusive Space: Caring Relationships at a Day Activity Centre with an Artistic Profile Cover

Art Work as an Inclusive Space: Caring Relationships at a Day Activity Centre with an Artistic Profile

Open Access
|Mar 2026

References

  1. Atkinson, Anne-Marie. 2020. “Being alongside and becoming researcher: Art practice, accountability and convergence in the studio.” International Journal of Art & Design Education 39 (4): 85569. DOI: 10.1111/jade.12326
  2. Brinkmann, Svend, and Steinar Kvale. 2018. Doing interviews. (2nd edition). Los Angeles: SAGE. DOI: 10.4135/9781529716665
  3. Davy, Laura. 2019. “Between an ethic of care and an ethic of autonomy: Negotiating relational autonomy, disability, and dependency.” Angelaki 24 (3): 10114. DOI: 10.1080/0969725X.2019.1620461
  4. Edwards, Claire, and Cliona Loughnane. 2024. “‘Plenty of disabled people care’: Revealing reciprocity and interdependence in disabled people’s everyday caregiving practices.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 26 (1). DOI: 10.16993/sjdr.1182
  5. Feder Kittay, Eva. 2011. “The ethics of care, dependence, and disability.” Ratio Juris 24 (1): 4958. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00473.x
  6. Fine, Michael D. 2007. A caring society? Care and dilemmas of human service in the 21st century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  7. Goodley, Dan, Rebecca Lawthom, Kirsty Liddiard, and Katherine Runswick-Cole. 2019. “Provocations for critical disability studies.” Disability & Society 34 (6): 97297. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2019.1566889
  8. Hall, Edward. 2013. “Making and gifting belonging: Creative arts and people with learning disabilities.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 45 (2): 24462. DOI: 10.1068/a44629
  9. Hammersley, Martyn, and Paul Atkinson. 2019. Ethnography: Principles in practice. 4th ed. London: Routledge. sul.oai.sub.su.se. 1091009. https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=52906bc4-06b4-37ff-ac07-70562ebd0340.
  10. Ineland, Jens. 2016. “Hybrid structures and cultural diversity in welfare services for people with intellectual disabilities. The case of inclusive education and disability arts in Sweden.” Alter 10 (4): 289300. DOI: 10.1016/j.alter.2016.06.002
  11. Ineland, Jens. 2020. “Legitimacy and ambiguity: Institutional logics and their outcome for people with intellectual disabilities.” Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 7 (1): 5463. DOI: 10.1080/23297018.2019.1641833
  12. Kelly, Christine. 2013. “Building bridges with accessible care: Disability studies, feminist care scholarship, and beyond.” Hypatia 28 (4): 784800. DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2012.01310.x
  13. Knutes Nyqvist, Helen, and Marie-Louise Stjerna. 2017. “Artistry and disability – doing art for real? Affordances at a day activity centre with an artistic profile.” Disability & Society 32 (7): 96685. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2017.1337563
  14. Kröger, Teppo. 2009. “Care research and disability studies: Nothing in common?” Critical Social Policy 29 (3): 398420. DOI: 10.1177/0261018309105177
  15. Levy, Susan, and Hannah Young. 2020. “Arts, disability and crip theory: Temporal re-imagining in social care for people with profound and multiple learning disabilities.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 22 (1). DOI: 10.16993/sjdr.620
  16. McLaughlin, Janice. 2020. “Valuing care and support in an era of celebrating independence: Disabled young people’s reflections on their meaning and role in their lives.” Sociology 54 (2): 397413. DOI: 10.1177/0038038519868630
  17. Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics & moral education. University of California Press. sul.oai.sub.su.se. 222894. https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=b9882c3d-f5a9-388d-aa18-bcf8082310a4.
  18. Scott, Lisa, and Chloe Watfern. 2021. “Becoming an artist and sharing my story.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 49 (3): 28792. DOI: 10.1111/bld.12397
  19. Sevenhuijsen, Selma. 2003. “The place of care: The relevance of the feminist ethic of care for social policy.” Feminist Theory 4 (2): 17997. DOI: 10.1177/14647001030042006
  20. Solvang, Per Koren. 2018. “Between art therapy and disability aesthetics: A sociological approach for understanding the intersection between art practice and disability discourse.” Disability & Society 33 (2): 23853. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2017.1392929
  21. Stober, Kaitlin, and Edurne García Iriarte. 2022. “Intellectual disability, art and identity: A qualitative exploration of the experiences of professional artists with intellectual disabilities.” Disability & Society 38 (10): 187194. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2022.2045187
  22. Viscardis, Katharine, Carla Rice, Victoria Pileggi, Angela Underhill, Eliza Chandler, Nadine Changfoot, Phyllis Montgomery, and Roxanne Mykitiuk. 2019. “Difference within and without: Health care providers’ engagement with disability arts.” Qualitative Health Research 29 (9): 128798. DOI: 10.1177/1049732318808252
  23. Ward, Nicki. 2011. “Care ethics and carers with learning disabilities: A challenge to dependence and paternalism.” Ethics and Social Welfare 5 (2): 16880. DOI: 10.1080/17496535.2011.571066
  24. Williams, Fiona. 2001. “In and beyond new labour: Towards a new political ethics of care.” Critical Social Policy 21 (4): 46793. DOI: 10.1177/026101830102100405
  25. Yarmol, Christina. 2023. “Citizen artist: Examining a community-based studio art program.” Journal Developmental Disabilities, Suppl. Special Issue 28 (2): 121.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.1269 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 117 - 129
Submitted on: Feb 19, 2025
Accepted on: Feb 16, 2026
Published on: Mar 9, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Marie-Louise Stjerna, Helen Knutes Nyqvist, Stephan Hau, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.