Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Disabled People’s Experiences in Rehabilitation: A Perspective of Gender and Age Cover

Disabled People’s Experiences in Rehabilitation: A Perspective of Gender and Age

Open Access
|Jul 2025

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Characteristics of participants (N = 499).

MENWOMENp-valueaTOTALMISSING
n(%)n(%)n(%)n(%)
Gender198(39.7)294(58.9)492(98,6)7(1.4)
Age13(2.6)
      <3928(14.4)81(27.8)<0.001109(22.4)
      40–5449(25.1)102(35.1)151(31.1)
      55–6446(23.6)73(25.1)119(24.5)
      65>72(36.9)35(12.0)107(22.0)
Highest level of education14(2.8)
      Elementary school41(21.2)88(30.1)0.018129(26.6)
      Secondary school/job certification112(58.0)132(45.2)244(50.3)
      University40(20.7)72(24.7)112(23.1)
Living situation7(1.4)
      Living alone35(17.7)67(22.8)0.17102(20.7)
      Living with someone163(82.3)227(77.2)390(79.3)
Health issue – self-reportedb
      Musculoskeletal74(37.4)198(67.3)<0.001272(55.3)
      Cardiac and/or pulmonary112(56.6)74(25.2)<0.001186(37.8)
      Mental32(16.2)98(33.3)<0.001130(26.4)
      Obesity36(18.2)93(31.6)0.001129(26.2)
      Central nervous system23(11.6)34(11.6)0.98657(11.6)
      Cancer or the immune system13(6.6)14(4.8)0.38927(5.5)
      Perception7(3.5)11(3.7)0.90518(3.7)
      Other26(13.1)47(16.0)0.38273(14.8)
Roles and responsibilities
      On labor marketc75(49.0)113(40.9)0.106188(43.8)
      In school3(1.5)23(7.8)0.00226(5.3)
      Takes care of a home42(21.2)144(49.0)<0.001186(37.8)
      Take care of others19(9.6)75(25.5)<0.00194(19.1)
      On disability pensionc52(34.0)110(39.9)0.230162(37.8)
      Unemployedc23(15.0)29(10.5)0.16952(12.1)

[i] aChi-Square Tests.

bParticipants reported more than one issue.

c67 years and younger.

Table 2

Differences by gender and age on subscale Responsiveness to needs and preferences.

CCRQ-ISAGE GROUP <39AGE GROUP 40–54AGE GROUP 55–64AGE GROUP 65>
MEAN
sd/n
MEAN
sd/n
MEAN
sd/n
MEAN
sd/n
QUESTIONSMENWOMENp-VALUEEFFECT SIZE dMENWOMENp-VALUEEFFECT SIZE dMENWOMENp-VALUEEFFECT SIZE dMENWOMENp-VALUEEFFECT SIZE d
Responsiveness to needs and preferences (all questions).4,20
0,47/28
3,85
0,96/81
0,013*0,414,35
0,50/49
4,26
0,70/102
0,4420,134,46
0,51/46
4,52
0,47/73
0,523–0,124,41
0,44/72
4,47
0,45/35
0,497–0,14
The professionals consulted with me and took my needs into account when creating a special program (schedule) for me.4,57
0,55/28
3,94
1,21/81
<,001*0,594,42
0,88/49
4,22
1,03/102
0,2450,204,52
0,72/46
4,43
0,82/73
0,5560,114,38
0,74/72
4,56
0,65/35
0,226–0,25
I did not have to repeat the same information for different professionals.3,39
1,29/28
3,35
1,38/81
0,8740,043,55
1,12/49
3,78
1,20/102
0,276–0,193,98
1,14/46
4,16
0,93/73
0,333–0,183,92
0,90/72
4,17
0,75/35
0,150–0,30
The professionals treated my pain as much as they possibly could.4,20
0,76/28
3,89
1,27/81
0,1200,274,61
0,51/49
4,37
0,98/102
0,046*0,284,64
0,44/46
4,71
0,56/73
0,460–0,144,62
0,50/72
4,51
0,69/35
0,4150,19
The professionals took note of my descriptions of pain.4,62
0,51/28
4,22
1,17/81
0,015*0,394,79
0,39/49
4,67
0,58/102
0,1230,244,69
0,67/46
4,75
0,48/73
0,559–0,114,71
0,40/72
4,63
0,51/35
0,4050,17

[i] sd = standard deviation, n = number, *Significant difference, Effect size d = small effect (0,2), medium (d = 0,5), large (d ≥ 0,8).

Table 3

Differences by gender and age on subscale Interaction with significant others.

CCRQ-ISAGE GROUP <39AGE GROUP 40–54AGE GROUP 55–64AGE GROUP 65>
MEAN
sd/n
MEAN
sd/n
MEAN
sd/n
MEAN
sd/n
QUESTIONSMENWOMENp-VALUEEFFECT SIZE dMENWOMENp-VALUEEFFECT SIZE dMENWOMENp-VALUEEFFECT SIZE dMENWOMENp-VALUEEFFECT SIZE d
The involvement of significant others (all questions)3,01
0,89/28
2,93
1,01/81
0,7030,083,34
0,73/49
2,97
0,8/102
0,007*0,473,74
0,78/46
3,21
0,84/73
<,0010,643,53
0,69/72
3,56
1,07/35
0,86–0,04
The professionals gave my significant others the support they needed.2,93
1,02/28
2,96
1,21/81
0,912–0,023,36
0,92/49
2,96
0,91/102
0,013*0,443,78
0,94/46
3,24
1,05/73
0,005*0,543,54
0,9/72
3,63
1,17/35
0,660,09
My significant others received instruction and information from the professionals (with my consent).2,79
1,10/28
2,75
1,32/81
0,9070,033,25
0,97/49
2,81
1,14/102
0,02*0,413,48
1,11/46
3,09
1,08/73
0,0590,363,47
1,02/72
3,54
1,22/35
0,7580,06
The attitude of professionals towards my significant others reflected respect for them.3,45
0,83/28
3,45
1,01/81
0,99803,8
0,86/49
3,45
0,93/102
0,025*0,394,05
0,88/46
3,7
1,01/73
0,0560,363,96
0,81/72
3,86
1,05/35
0,5740,12
My significant others were invited to participate in the rehabilitation as much as I wanted.2,89
1,34/28
2,57
1,19/81
0,2350,262,94
0,97/49
2,66
1,05/102
0,1270,273,63
0,95/46
2,83
1,11/73
<,001*0,763,14
0,95/72
3,22
1,14/35
0,687–0,08

[i] sd = standard deviation, n = number, *Significant difference.

Effect size d = small effect (0,2), medium (d = 0,5), large (d ≥ 0,8).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.1231 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 3, 2024
Accepted on: Jul 8, 2025
Published on: Jul 31, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Sólrún Óladóttir, Marte Feiring, Guðmundur Kristján Óskarsson, Snæfríður Þóra Egilson, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.