Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Troubling the Quest for Clarity Cover
Open Access
|Jun 2025

References

  1. Acton, Kelsie. 2023. “Plain Language for Disability Culture.” In Crip Authorship: Disability as Method, edited by Mara Mills and Rebecca Sanchez, 5872. New York: New York University Press. DOI: 10.18574/nyu/9781479819386.003.0008
  2. Barnard, Ian. 2010. “The Ruse of Clarity.” College Composition and Communication 61(3): 434451. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40593334.
  3. Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image Music Text. London: Fontana Press.
  4. Berlant, Lauren. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Durham and London: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780822394716
  5. Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York and London: Routledge.
  6. Butler, Judith. 1997. “Further Reflections on Conversations of Our Time.” Diacritics 27(1): 1315. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1566267.
  7. Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. 10th anniversary edition. New York and London: Routledge.
  8. Butler, Judith. 2003. “Values of Difficulty.” In Just Being Difficult? Academic Writing in the Public Arena, edited by Jonathan Culler and Kevin Lamb, 199215. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781503624009-014
  9. Butler, Judith. 2015. Senses of the Subject. New York: Fordham University Press. DOI: 10.1017/S2753906700001480
  10. Butler, Judith. 2022. What World Is This? A Pandemic Phenomenology. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI: 10.7312/butl20828
  11. Chinn, Deborah, and Claire Homeyard. 2017. “Easy Read and Accessible Information for People with Intellectual Disabilities: Is it Worth It? A Meta-Narrative Literature Review.” Health Expectations 20(6): 11891200. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12520
  12. Collyer, Fran M. 2021. “Australia and the Global South: Knowledge and the Ambiguities of Place and Identity.” Journal of Historical Sociology 34(1): 4154. DOI: 10.1111/johs.12312
  13. Connell, Raewyn. 2019. The Good University. Melbourne: Monash University Publishing.
  14. Culler, Jonathan, and Kevin Lamb. 2003. “Introduction: Dressing Up, Dressing Down.” In Just Being Difficult? Academic Writing in the Public Arena, edited by Jonathan Culler and Kevin Lamb, 112. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781503624009-001
  15. Ding, Dawei, and Zhengfeng Li. 2022. “The Theoretical Origin of the Knowledge-Sharing Mode of Open Access: From Knowledge Communism to Academic Capitalism.” Cultures of Science 4(4): 199207. DOI: 10.1177/20966083221075424
  16. Dolmage, Jay T. 2014. Disability Rhetoric. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
  17. Dolmage, Jay T. 2017. Academic Ableism: Disability and Higher Education. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.9708722
  18. Ferguson, Margaret. 2003. “Difficult Style and ‘Illustrious’ Vernaculars: A Historical Perspective.” In Just Being Difficult? Academic Writing in the Public Arena, edited by Jonathan Culler and Kevin Lamb, 1528. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781503624009-002
  19. Goggin, Gerard, and Katie Ellis. 2020. “Disability, Communication, and Life Itself in the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Health Sociology Review 29(2): 168176. DOI: 10.1080/14461242.2020.1784020
  20. Goodley, Dan. 2014. Dis/ability Studies: Theorising Disablism and Ableism. London and New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203366974
  21. Goodley, Dan. 2017. Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. 2nd edn. London: SAGE.
  22. Goodley, Dan, and Leslie Swartz. 2016. “The Place of Disability.” In Disability in the Global South: The Critical Handbook, edited by Shaun Grech and Karen Soldatic, 6983. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42488-0_5
  23. Grech, Shaun. 2009. “Disability, Poverty and Development: Critical Reflections on the Majority World Debate.” Disability & Society 24(6): 771784. DOI: 10.1080/09687590903160266
  24. Grech, Shaun, and Karen Soldatic. 2016. “Introduction: Disability in the Global South.” In Disability in the Global South: The Critical Handbook, edited by Shaun Grech and Karen Soldatic, xiiixxviii. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42488-0
  25. Grünfeld, Martin. 2020. Writing and Thinking in Contemporary Academia: The Poetics of Clarity. London and New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429458422
  26. Hall, Stuart. 1980. “Encoding/Decoding.” In Culture, Media, Language, edited by Stuart Hall, Dorothy Hobson, Andrew Lowe, and Paul Willis, 128138. London: Hutchinson.
  27. Hammell, Karen W. 2006. Perspectives on Disability & Rehabilitation: Contesting Assumptions; Challenging Practice. Edinburgh: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-044310059-8.50013-X
  28. Hamraie, Aimi. 2017. Building Access: Universal Design and the Politics of Disability. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. DOI: 10.5749/minnesota/9781517901639.001.0001
  29. Haynes, Anthony. 2010. Writing Successful Academic Books. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511712081
  30. Hurtado, Barbara, L. Jones, and F. Burniston. 2014. “Is Easy Read Information Easier to Read?” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 58(9): 822829. DOI: 10.1111/jir.12097
  31. Kaag, John, and Jonathan van Belle. 2024. Thinking through Writing: A Guide to Becoming a Better Writer & Thinker. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780691249605
  32. Kafer, Alison. 2013. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. DOI: 10.2979/6841.0
  33. Knöchelmann, Marcel. 2021. “The Democratisation Myth: Open Access and the Solidification of Epistemic Injustices.” Science & Technology Studies 34(2): 6589. DOI: 10.23987/sts.94964
  34. Lanham, Richard A. 2003. Analyzing Prose. 2nd edn. London and New York: Continuum.
  35. Lather, Patti. 1996. “Troubling Clarity: The Politics of Accessible Language.” Harvard Educational Review 66(3): 525545. DOI: 10.17763/haer.66.3.6qxv1p081102560g
  36. Lather, Patti, and Chris Smithies. 1995. Troubling the Angels: Women Living with HIV/AIDS. Columbus, OH: Greyden Press.
  37. Lupton, Deborah, and Karen Willis. 2021. “COVID Society: Introduction to the Book.” In The COVID-19 Crisis: Social Perspectives, edited by Deborah Lupton and Karen Willis, 113. London and New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003111344-2
  38. Luterman, Sara. 2020. Plain language translation of Disability Visibility: First-Person Stories from the Twenty-First Century. Disability Visibility Project. Accessed September 10, 2024. https://disabilityvisibilityproject.com/.
  39. McRuer, Robert. 2006. Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. New York and London: New York University Press.
  40. Meekosha, Helen, and Karen Soldatic. 2011. “Human Rights and the Global South: The Case of Disability.” Third World Quarterly 32(8): 13831398. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2011.614800
  41. Meltzer, Ariella, Emma Barnes, and Ayah Wehbe. 2025. “Easy Read… Easy English… Plain Language? Decision-Making in the Production of ‘Easy’ Information in Australia.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 38(1): 19. DOI: 10.1111/jar.70021
  42. Mingus, Mia. 2017. “Access Intimacy, Interdependence and Disability Justice.” Accessed February 19, 2025. https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2017/04/12/access-intimacy-interdependence-and-disability-justice/.
  43. Nathues, Ellen, Milena Leybold, and Monica Nadegger. 2024. “Dear Vulnerability … Writing Toget-her to Escape and Resist Neoliberal University.” Culture and Organization 116. DOI: 10.1080/14759551.2024.2375747
  44. Nussbaum, Martha. 1999. “The Professor of Parody: The Hip Defeatism of Judith Butler.” The New Republic, February 23.
  45. Oliver, Michael. 2009. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. 2nd edition. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  46. Piepzna-Samarasinha, Leah L. 2018. Care Work: Dreaming Disability Justice. Vancouver, BC: Arsenal Pulp Press.
  47. Rasmussen, Mary L. 2003. “Queer Trepidations and the Art of Inclusion.” Critical Studies in Education 44(1): 87107. DOI: 10.1080/17508487.2003.9558593
  48. Row, Jennifer E. 2024. “Difficult Articulacy: Rhetoric, Disability and Early Modern Styling of Bodymind.” Paragraph 47(1): 90107. DOI: 10.3366/para.2024.0453
  49. Samuels, Ellen. 2002. “Judith Butler’s Body Theory and the Question of Disability.” NWSA Journal 14(3): 5876. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4316924.
  50. Shakespeare, Tom. 1996. “Rules of Engagement: Doing Disability Research.” Disability & Society 11(1): 115121. DOI: 10.1080/09687599650023380
  51. Shakespeare, Tom. 2013. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. 2nd edn. London and New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315887456
  52. Shakespeare, Tom. 2015. “Introduction.” In Disability Research Today: International Perspectives, edited by Tom Shakespeare, 15. London and New York: Routledge.
  53. Shildrick, Margrit. 2009. Dangerous Discourses of Disability, Subjectivity and Sexuality. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230244641
  54. Shildrick, Margrit. 2019. “Neoliberalism and Embodied Precarity: Some Crip Responses.” The South Atlantic Quarterly 118(3): 595613. DOI: 10.1215/00382876-7616175
  55. Smilges, J. Logan. 2023. Crip Negativity. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. DOI: 10.5749/9781452969602
  56. St. Pierre, Joshua. 2015. “Distending Straight-Masculine Time: A Phenomenology of the Disabled Speaking Body.” Hypatia 30(1): 4965. DOI: 10.1111/hypa.12128
  57. St. Pierre, Joshua. 2017. “Becoming Dysfluent: Fluency as Biopolitics and Hegemony.” Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 11(3): 339356. DOI: 10.3828/jlcds.2017.26
  58. Strunk, William, and E. B. White. 2000. The Elements of Style. 4th edn. New York: Longman.
  59. Sutherland, Rebekah Joy, and Tom Isherwood. 2016. “The Evidence Base for Easy-Read for People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 13(4): 297310. DOI: 10.1111/jppi.12201
  60. Sword, Helen. 2012. Stylish Academic Writing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.4159/harvard.9780674065093
  61. Thorneycroft, Ryan, and Nicole L. Asquith. 2021. “Unexceptional Violence in Exceptional Times: Disablist and Ableist Violence During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” International Justice for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 10(2): 140155. DOI: 10.5204/ijcjsd.1743
  62. Titchkosky, Tanya. 2011. The Question of Access: Disability, Space, Meaning. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press. DOI: 10.4159/harvard.9780674065093
  63. Tremain, Shelley. 2002. “On the Subject of Impairment.” In Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory, edited by Mairian Corker and Tom Shakespeare, 3247. London and New York: Continuum.
  64. Turner, Bryan S. 2024. “Does the University Have a Future?” Theory, Culture & Society 41(7–8): 123135. DOI: 10.1177/02632764241299411
  65. Vehmas, Simo, and Pekka Mäkelä. 2009. “The Ontology of Disability and Impairment: A Discussion of the Natural and Social Features.” In Arguing about Disability: Philosophical Perspectives, edited by Kristjana Kristiansen, Simo Vehmas, and Tom Shakespeare, 4256. London and New York: Routledge.
  66. Walmsley, Jan. 2001. “Normalisation, Emancipatory Research and Inclusive Research in Learning Disability.” Disability & Society 16(2): 187205. DOI: 10.1080/09687590120035807
  67. Williams, Joseph M., and Joseph Bizup. 2017. Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace. 12th edn. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  68. Wong, Alice. (ed). 2020. Disability Visibility: First-Person Stories from the Twenty-First Century. New York: Vintage Books.
  69. Yergeau, M. Remi. 2018. Authoring Autism: On Rhetoric and Neurological Queerness. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/9780822372189
  70. Young, Iris M. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.1215 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 345 - 358
Submitted on: Oct 17, 2024
Accepted on: Jun 4, 2025
Published on: Jun 19, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Ryan Thorneycroft, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.