Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Navigating in Closeness with Residents at Group Homes for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: Self-Determination and Ethical Dilemmas in Everyday Work Cover

Navigating in Closeness with Residents at Group Homes for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: Self-Determination and Ethical Dilemmas in Everyday Work

Open Access
|May 2025

References

  1. Alftberg, Åsa and Kristofer Hansson. 2012. “Self-care Translated into Practice.” Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research 4(3): 415424. DOI: 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.124415
  2. Altermark, Niklas. 2016. “After inclusion: Intellectual disability as biopolitics.” PhD Thesis, Lund University. DOI: 10.4324/9781315109947
  3. Barron, Karin. 2001. “Autonomy in everyday life, for whom?” Disability & Society 16(3): 431447. DOI: 10.1080/09687590120045987
  4. Bell, Emma, and Alan Bryman. 2007. “The ethics of management research: An exploratory content analysis.” British Journal of Management 18(1): 6377. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00487.x
  5. Bergeron, L. Rene, and Betsey Gray. 2003. “Ethical dilemmas of reporting suspected elder abuse.” Social Work 48(1): 96105. DOI: 10.1093/sw/48.1.96
  6. Bigby, Christine, Mary Whiteside, and Jacinta Douglas. 2019. “Providing support for decision making to adults with intellectual disability: Perspectives of family members and workers in disability support services.” Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 44(4): 396409. DOI: 10.3109/13668250.2017.1378873
  7. Björne, Petra. 2020. “As if living like others: An idealisation of life in group homes for people with intellectual disability.” Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 45(4): 337343. DOI: 10.3109/13668250.2020.1793451
  8. Blennberger, Erik. 2005. Etik i socialpolitik och socialt arbete [Ethics in social policy and social work]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  9. Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using thematic analysis in psycology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  10. Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2019. “Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11(4): 589597. DOI: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
  11. Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2022. Thematic Analysis. Sage. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3470-2
  12. Browning, Michelle, Christine Bigby, and Jacinta Douglas. 2021. “A process of decision-making support: Exploring supported decision-making practice in Canada.” Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 46(2): 138149. DOI: 10.3109/13668250.2020.1789269
  13. Burke, Kathryn M., Sheida Raley, Karrie A. Shogren, Mayumi Hagiwara, Cristina Mumbardó-Adam, Hatice Uyanik, and Sara Behrens. 2020. “A meta-analysis of interventions to promote self-determination for students with disabilities.” Remedial and Special Education 41(3): 176188. DOI: 10.1177/0741932518802274
  14. Clement, Tim and Christine Bigby. 2013. “Ethical Challenges in Researching in Group Homes for People with Severe Learning Difficulties: Shifting the Balance of Power.” Disability & Society 28(4): 486499. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2012.711245
  15. De Beauvoir, Simone. 1962. The Ethics of Ambiguity, tr. Toronto: Citadel Press.
  16. Engen, Mie, Mette Rømer, and Anthon Jørgensen. 2019. “Public care for people with intellectual disability in Denmark – ideals, policy and practice.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 21(1): 228237. DOI: 10.16993/sjdr.582
  17. Erlandsson, Sara. 2014. “Hjälp för att bevara eller förändra?: åldersrelaterade diskurser om omsorg, stöd och service [Help to Preserve or Change?: Age-Related Discourses on Care, Support, and Services].” PhD Thesis, Stockholms universitet.
  18. Fioretos, Ingrid, Kristofer Hansson, and Gabriella Nilsson. 2013. Vårdmöten: kulturanalytiska perspektiv på möten inom vården [Care encounters: cultural analytical perspectives on meetings within healthcare].” Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  19. Gäddman Johansson, Richard. 2021. “Managing vulnerability: everyday interaction in sheltered accommodations.” PhD Thesis, Department of Sociology, Uppsala University. Accessed June 12, 2024. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-434205.
  20. Giertz, Lottie. 2012. “Erkännande, makt och möten: En studie av inflytande och självbestämmande med LSS [Recognition, Power, and Encounters: A Study of Influence and Self-Determination with LSS].” PhD Thesis, Linnaeus University (93). Accessed June 12, 2024. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-18816.
  21. Guttmann, David. 2013. Ethics in social work: A context of caring. Great Britain: Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.4324/9780203725900
  22. Hansson, Kristofer. 2011. “Delaktighet med förhinder: Vardagsetiska perspektiv i habilitering [Participation with obstacles: Everyday ethical perspectives in rehabilitation].” Socialmedicinsk Tidskrift 88(3): 217223.
  23. Hastings, Richard P. 2010. “Support staff working in intellectual disability services: The importance of relationships and positive experiences.” Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 35(3): 20710. DOI: 10.3109/13668250.2010.492710
  24. Hay, Jenny. 2019. “‘Care is not a dirty word!’ Enacting an ethic of care in social work practice.” European Journal of Social Work 22(3): 365375. DOI: 10.1080/13691457.2017.1399253
  25. Hollander, Jocelyn A. 2004. “The social contexts of focus groups.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 33(5): 602637. DOI: 10.1177/0891241604266988
  26. Hultman, Lill, Magnus Tideman, and Maria Eriksson. 2022. “‘A limited guardian should first and foremost get to know the person he helps’—Experiences of having a limited guardian from the perspective of adults with intellectual disability.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 24(1). DOI: 10.16993/sjdr.949
  27. Ineland, Jens. 2007. “Mellan konst och terapi: om teater för personer med utvecklingsstörning.” “Between art and therapy: on theater for people with intellectual disabilities.” PhD Thesis, Umeå University. Accessed June 12, 2024. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-1083.
  28. Kelly, Christine. 2016. Disability politics and care: The challenge of direct funding. Canada: UBC Press. DOI: 10.59962/9780774830119
  29. Kittay, Eva Feder. 2020. “Care and disability: friends or foes.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Disability, edited by Adam Cureton & David T. Wasserman, 415431. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190622879.013.24
  30. Larsson, Monica, and Lars G. Larsson. 2024. Stöd och service till vissa funktionshindrade: LSS 2024 [Support and service for certain individuals with disabilities: LSS 2024]. Stockholm: Gothia kompetens.
  31. Larsson, Susanne. 2021. “Självbestämmande i LSS: En villkorad rättighet för personer med intellektuell funktionsnedsättning [Self-determination in LSS: A conditional right for people with intellectual disabilities].” PhD Thesis, Ersta Sköndal Bräcke University College (10). Accessed June 12, 2024. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:esh:diva-8732.
  32. Lid, Inger Marie. 2022. “The significance of relations. Rethinking autonomy in a disability perspective.” In Lived citizenship for persons in vulnerable life situations: Theories and practices, edited by K.J. Fjetland, A. Gjermestad, and I.M. Lid (ed.). Scandinavian University Press. DOI: 10.18261/9788215053790-2022-06
  33. Lindqvist, Rafael. 2020. Socialvetenskapliga perspektiv på funktionshinder: Medborgarskap, delaktighet och tillgänglighet för personer med funktionsnedsättning [Social science perspectives on disability: citizenship, participation, and accessibility for people with disabilities]. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  34. Lindqvist, Rafael. 2022. Funktionshinder i välfärdssamhället. Femte upplagan [Disability in the welfare society], 5th ed. Malmö: Gleerups.
  35. Lindwall, Johan. 2020. “Handlingsimperativets dilemman–Om frihet och kontroll i socialtjänstens arbete med klienter som använder narkotika [The dilemmas of the action imperative–On freedom and control in social services’ work with clients who use drugs].” PhD Thesis, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Gothenburg.
  36. Lis, Thomas. 2004. Emmanuel Levinas: Ethics, justice, and the human beyond being. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203504970
  37. Lövgren, Veronica. 2017. “Leva som andra: intersektionen ålder och funktionsförmåga.” In Introduktion till kritiska åldersstudier [Living like others: The intersection of age and functional ability. In Introduction to Critical Age Studies], edited by Barbro Johansson and Clary Krekula, 95108. Lund.
  38. Mol, Annemarie, Ingunn Moser, and Jeanette Pols, eds. 2010. Care in practice. On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. DOI: 10.1515/transcript.9783839414477
  39. Namatovu, Fredinah, Jens Ineland and Veronica Lövgren. 2021. “The perspectives of professionals on providing services to women with disabilities that experience intimate-partner violence.” CEDAR Working Papers, 7. Umeå universitet.
  40. Neuman, Ran, and Diane N. Bryen. 2022. “Dare to dream: The changing role of social work in supporting adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.” British Journal of Social Work 52(5): 26132632. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcab195
  41. Oliver, Mike. 1989. “Disability and Dependency: A Creation of Industrial Societies.” In Disability and dependency, edited by Len Barton, 622. Lewes, East Sussex: The Falmer Press.
  42. Petner-Arrey, Jami and Susan R. Copeland. 2015. “You have to care. Perceptions of promoting autonomy in support settings for adults with intellectual disability.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 43(1): 3848. DOI: 10.1111/bld.12084
  43. Puaca, Goran, Lina Palmqvist and Margareta Carlén. 2023. “Om aktörskap och självbestämmandets vilkor inom LSS [On agency and the conditions of self-determination within LSS].” Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift 2023(4): 861880. Accessed June 15, 2024. DOI: 10.3384/SVT.2023.30.4.5113
  44. Rogers, Chrissie. 2016. Intellectual disability and being human: A care ethics model. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315638713
  45. Ruiz-Pérez, Isabel, Guadalupe Pastor-Moreno, Vicenta Escribà-Agüir, and Gracia Maroto-Navarro. 2018. “Intimate partner violence in women with disabilities: perception of healthcare and attitudes of health professionals.” Disability and Rehabilitation 40(9): 10591065. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1288273
  46. Sépulchre, Marie. 2022. “Disability, justice and freedom as non-domination.” The International Journal of Disability and Social Justice 2(1): 1130. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48676194. DOI: 10.13169/intljofdissocjus.2.1.0011
  47. Swedish Government. 1993a. “Act on support and service for persons with certain functional impairments.” 1993:387. Accessed June 12, 2024. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/lag-1993387-om-stod-och-service-till-vissa_sfs-1993-387/.
  48. Swedish Government. 1993b. “Proposition 1992/93:159 on support and sevice for persons with certain functional impairments.” Accessed June 12, 2024. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/proposition/om-stod-och-service-till-vissa-funktionshindrade_GG03159.
  49. Swedish Government. 2018. “Act containing supplementary provisions to the eu general data protection 2018:218.” Accessed June 12, 2024. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/lag-2018218-med-kompletterande-bestammelser_sfs-2018-218/.
  50. Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. 2002. “Regulations and general advice on housing with special services for adults according to LSS.” SOSFS 2002:9. Stockholm: Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Accessed August 26, 2024. https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/foreskrifter-och-allmanna-rad/2002-10-9_2002_9.pdf.
  51. Swedish Research Council. 2017.” Good Research Practice. Stockholm: Swedish Research Council.” Accessed May 02, 2025. https://www.vr.se/english/analysis/reports/our-reports/2017-08-31-good-research-practice.html.
  52. Thelin, Angelika. 2021. “Care ethics for supported decision-making. A narrative policy analysis regarding social work in cases of dementia and self-neglect.” Ethics and Social Welfare 15(2): 167184. DOI: 10.1080/17496535.2020.1863998
  53. van der Weele, Simon, Femmianne Bredewold, Carlo Leget, and Evelien Tonkens. 2021. “The group home as moral laboratory: tracing the ethic of autonomy in dutch intellectual disability care.” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 24(1): 113125. DOI: 10.1007/s11019-020-09991-y
  54. Vetlesen, A. 1997. “Introducing an ethics of proximity.” In Closeness: An ethics, edited by Arne Johan Vetlesen, Harald Jodalen, 119. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
  55. Wehmeyer, Michel, L. and Karrie A. Shogren 2016. “Self-determination and choice.” In Handbook of Evidence-Based Practices in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Evidence-Based Practices in Behavioral Health, edited by Nirbhay N. Singh, 561584. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26583-4_21
  56. World Medical Association. 2017. “Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.” Acessed May 02, 2025. https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.1108 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 200 - 213
Submitted on: Dec 11, 2023
Accepted on: Apr 19, 2025
Published on: May 12, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Sofia Bergholtz, Kristofer Hansson, Monica Larsson, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.