Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Recognising and Resisting Injustice: Knowledge Practices and Politics Amongst Nepal’s Community Forestry Professionals Cover

Recognising and Resisting Injustice: Knowledge Practices and Politics Amongst Nepal’s Community Forestry Professionals

By:   
Open Access
|Nov 2021

References

  1. Ahlborg, H., & Nightingale, A. (2012). Mismatch between scales of knowledge in Nepalese forestry: Epistemology, power, and policy implications. Ecology & Society, 17, 16. DOI: 10.5751/ES-05171-170416
  2. Arora-Jonsson, S. (2014). Forty years of gender research and environmental policy: Where do we stand? Women’s Studies International Forum, 47, 295308. DOI: 10.1016/j.wsif.2014.02.009
  3. Bhattari, B. (2017). Move over, men. Women should be included in decision-making roles in the management of forests. The Kathmandu Post, 19/02/17. Retrieved from http://kathmandupost.ekantipur.com/news/2017-02-19/move-over-men.html (31/07/20).
  4. Blaikie, P. (2006). Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and Botswana. World Development, 34, 19421957. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.023
  5. Chambers, R., Pacey, R., & Thrupp, L. A. (1989). Farmer first: Farmer innovation and agricultural research. London: Intermediate Technology Publications. DOI: 10.3362/9781780440149
  6. Colfer, C. J. P., Basnett, B. S., & Ihalainen, M. (2018). Making sense of ‘intersectionality’: A manual for lovers of people and forests. Occasional Paper 184. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR. DOI: 10.17528/cifor/006793
  7. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989, 139167. Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
  8. Davids, T., van Driel, F., & Parren, F. (2014). Feminist change revisited: Gender mainstreaming as slow revolution. Journal of International Development, 26(3), 396408. DOI: 10.1002/jid.2945
  9. Eyben, R. (2015). Uncovering the politics of evidence and results. In R. Eyben, I. Guijt, C. Roche & C. Shutt (Eds.), The Politics of Evidence and Results in International Development. Playing the Game to Change the Rules? (pp. 1938). Warwickshire: Practical Action Publishing. DOI: 10.3362/9781780448855.002
  10. Eyben, R. (2014). International aid and the making of a better world. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203077610
  11. Eyben, R., Guilt, I., Rocha, C., & Shutt, C. (2015). The politics of evidence and results in international development. Playing the game to change the rules? Warwickshire: Practical Action Publishing. DOI: 10.3362/9781780448855
  12. Fechter, A.-M. (2012). The Personal and the Professional: Aid workers’ relationships and values in the development process. Third World Quarterly, 33, 13871404. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2012.698104
  13. Ferguson, J. (1994). The anti-politics machine. “Development,” depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Fine, P. (2019). A Deeper Look: The currency of power: Addressing power dynamics within development. FHI360. Retrieved from: https://degrees.fhi360.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/deeperlook-jun2019-transcript.pdf (31/07/20)
  15. GESI Working Group. (2017). A Common Framework for Gender Equality & Social Inclusion. Nepal: International Partners Working Group.
  16. GoN. (2017). Forest Investment Program. Investment Plan for Nepal. Investing in Forests for Prosperity at a Time of Transformation. Babarmahal, Kathmandu: Government of Nepal, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation. Retrieved from: https://www.climateinvestmentfunds.org/sites/cif_enc/files/fip_ip_nepal.pdf (31/07/20).
  17. GoN. (2020). Community Forestry. Retrieved from: https://dof.gov.np/dof_community_forest_division/community_forestry_dof (31/07/20).
  18. Hakkarainen, K. (2009). A Knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 213231. DOI: 10.1007/s11412-009-9064-x
  19. Hayman, R., King, S., Kontinen, T., & Narayanaswamy, L. (2016). Negotiating knowledge. Evidence and experience in development NGOs. Warwickshire: Practical Action Publishing. DOI: 10.3362/9781780449258
  20. Hutt, M. (2020). The changing face of Nepal. Current History, 119(816), 141145. DOI: 10.1525/curh.2020.119.816.141
  21. Kapoor, I. (2004). Hyper-self-reflexive development? Spivak on representing the Third World ‘Other’. Third World Quarterly, 25, 627647. DOI: 10.1080/01436590410001678898
  22. Koch, N. (2020). Deep listening: Practicing intellectual humility in geographic fieldwork. Geographical Review, 110, 5264. DOI: 10.1111/gere.12334
  23. Kontinen, T. (2016). What sense does it make? Vocabularies of practice and knowledge creation in a development NGO. In R. Hayman, S. King, T. Kontinen & L. Narayanaswamy (Eds.) Negotiating Knowledge. Evidence and experience in development NGOs (pp. 2946). Warwickshire: Practical Action Publishing. DOI: 10.3362/9781780449258.003
  24. King, S., Kontinen, T., Narayanaswamy, L., & Hayman, R. (2016). Why do NGOs need to negotiate knowledge? In R. Hayman, S. King, T. Kontinen & L. Narayanaswamy (Eds.) Negotiating knowledge. Evidence and experience in development NGOs (pp. 116). Warwickshire: Practical Action Publishing. DOI: 10.3362/9781780449258.001
  25. Li, T. M. (2007). The will to improve. Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. London: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780822389781
  26. Lund, J. F. (2015). Paradoxes of participation: The logic of professionalization in participatory forestry. Forest Policy and Economics, 60, 16. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.07.009
  27. Marquardt, K., Khatri, D., & Pain, A. (2016). REDD+, forest transition, agrarian change and ecosystem services in the hills of Nepal. Human Ecology, 44, 229244. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-016-9817-x
  28. Morchain, D. (2018). Deconstructing gender identities and power structures. Retrieved from: https://views-voices.oxfam.org.uk/gender/2018/04/deconstructing-gender-identities-and-power-structures (31/07/20)
  29. Mosse, D. (2014). Knowledge as relational: Reflections on knowledge in international development. Forum for Development Studies, 41, 513523. DOI: 10.1080/08039410.2014.959379
  30. Narayanaswamy, L. (2016). Whose feminism counts? Gender(ed) knowledge and professionalism in development. Third World Quarterly, 37, 21562175. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2016.1173511
  31. Nightingale, A. (2002). Participating or just sitting in? The dynamics of gender and caste in community forestry. Journal of Forest and Livelihood, 2(1).
  32. Nightingale, A. (2005). ‘The experts taught us all we know’: Professionalisation and knowledge in Nepalese community forestry. Antipode, 37, 581604. DOI: 10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00512.x
  33. Ojha, H. (2006). Techno-bureaucratic doxa and challenges for deliberative governance: The case of community forestry policy and practice in Nepal. Policy and Society, 25, 151204. DOI: 10.1016/S1449-4035(06)70077-7
  34. Ojha, H., Khatri, D. B., Shrestha, K. K., et al. (2016). Can evidence and voice influence policy? A critical assessment of Nepal’s forestry sector strategy, 2014. Society & Natural Resources, 29, 357373. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1122851
  35. Pokharel, R. K., & Tiwari, K. R. (2013). Good governance assessment in Nepal’s community forestry. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 32, 549564. DOI: 10.1080/10549811.2013.779902
  36. Poudel, D. (2019). Migration, forest management and traditional institutions: Acceptance of and resistance to community forestry models in Nepal. Geoforum, 106, 275286. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.09.003
  37. Rutt, R., Chhetri, B. B. K., Pokharel, R., et al. (2015). The scientific framing of forestry decentralisation in Nepal. Forest Policy and Economics, 60, 5061. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.06.005
  38. Spivak, G. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and interpretation of culture (pp. 271313). Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1_20
  39. Staddon, S., Nightingale, A., & Shrestha, S. (2014). The social nature of participatory ecological monitoring. Society & Natural Resources, 27, 899914. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2014.905897
  40. Staddon, S., Nightingale, A., & Shrestha, S. (2015). Exploring participation in ecological monitoring in Nepal’s community forests. Environmental Conservation, 42, 268277. DOI: 10.1017/S037689291500003X
  41. Toft, M. N. J., Adeyeye, Y., & Lund, J. F. (2015). The use and usefulness of inventory-based management planning to forest management: Evidence from community forestry in Nepal. Forest Policy and Economics, 60, 3549. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.06.007
  42. Warne-Peters, R. (2020). Implementing inequality. The invisible labor of international development. Rutgers University Press. DOI: 10.36019/9781978809000
  43. WOCAN. (2017). Gender integration in REDD+ and the ERPD in Nepal. Assessment report and gender action plan. Kathmandu, Nepal.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/rl.71 | Journal eISSN: 2002-0104
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 5
Submitted on: Sep 30, 2020
Accepted on: Sep 25, 2021
Published on: Nov 15, 2021
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Sam Staddon, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.