Decision Making in Tree Selection – Contemplating Conflicting Goals via Marteloscope Exercises
By: Bettina Joa, Anne Paulus, Ronja Mikoleit and Georg Winkel
References
- Ananda, J., & Herath, G. (2009). A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning. Ecological Economics, 68(10), 2535–2548. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.010
- Arts, B., Behagel, J., Turnhout, E., de Koning, J., & van Bommel, S. (2014). A practice-based approach to forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 49, 4–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.001
- Arts, B., Behagel, J., van Bommel, S., de Koning, J., & Turnhout, E. (2013).
Prelude to Practice: Introducing a Practice Based Approach to Forest and Nature Governance . In B. Arts, J. Behagel, S. van Bommel, J. de Koning, & E. Turnhout (Eds.), Forest and Nature Governance (pp. 3–22). Netherlands: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5113-2 - Bechstein, J. M. (1797). Anzeige von der Herzoglich-Sächsisch-Gothaischen und Altenburgischen Societät der Forst- und Jagdkunde zu Waltershausen. Diana, 1.
- Bennett, N. J., Roth, R., Klain, S. C., Chan, K., Christie, P., Clark, D. A., Cullman, G., Curran, D., Durbin, T. J., Epstein, G., Greenberg, A., Nelson, M. P., Sandlos, J., Stedman, R., Teel, T. L., Thomas, R., Veríssimo, D., & Wyborn, C. (2017). Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biological Conservation, 205, 93–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.006
- Bethmann, S., Simminger, E., Menton-Enderlin, D., Schröder, H., & Asmus, R. (2016). Wir wollen kein totes Holz in unserem Wald. FVA-Einblick, 1, 40–43.
- Bohnsack, R., Pfaff, N., & Weller, W. (Eds.) (2010). Qualitative analysis and documentary method in international educational research. Budrich. DOI: 10.3224/86649236
- Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice: Translated by Richard Nice. Stanford University Press.
http://www.loc.gov/catdir/description/cam023/88063435.html - Bruin, J. de Hoogstra-Klein, M., Mohren, G., & Arts, B. (2015). Complexity of forest management: Exploring perceptions of Dutch forest managers. Forests, 6(12), 3237–3255. DOI: 10.3390/f6093237
- Bütler, R., Lachat, T., Larrieu, L., & Paillet, Y. (2013).
Habitat trees: Key elements for forest biodiversity . In D. Kraus & F. Krumm (Eds.), Integrative approaches as an opportunity for the conservation of forest biodiversity (pp. 84–91). Bonn: European Forest Institute. - Charnley, S., Carothers, C., Satterfield, T., Levine, A., Poe, M. R., Norman, K., Donatuto, J., Breslow, S. J., Mascia, M. B., Levin, P. S., Basurto, X., Hicks, C. C., García-Quijano, C., & St. Martin, K. (2017). Evaluating the best available social science for natural resource management decision making. Environmental Science & Policy, 73, 80–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.002
- Cosyns, H., Kraus, D., Krumm, F., Schulz, T., & Pyttel, P. (2018).
Reconciling the tradeoff between economic and ecological objectives in habitat-tree selection: A comparison between students, foresters, and forestry trainers . Forest Science. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1093/forsci/fxy042 - Dahrendorf, R., & Abels, H. (2010). Homo Sociologicus: Ein Versuch zur Geschichte, Bedeutung und Kritik der Kategorie der sozialen Rolle (17. Aufl.). Neue Bibliothek der Sozialwissenschaften. VS Verl. für Sozialwiss. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-92592-9
- De Koning, J., & Benneker, C. (2013).
Bricolage practices in local forestry . In B. Arts, J. Behagel, S. van Bommel, J. de Koning, & E. Turnhout (Eds.), Forest and Nature Governance (pp. 49–67). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5113-2_3 - DeWalt, K. M., & DeWalt, B. R. (2011). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers (2nd ed.). Lanham, Maryland: AltaMira Press.
- EFI. (2018). I+ Software Store. European Forest Institute.
http://iplus.efi.int/ Latest accessed February 10, 2020. - EFI. (2019). Marteloscope Sites. European Forest Institute.
https://informar.eu/marteloscope-sites#map Latest accessed February 10, 2020. - Gustafsson, L., Baker, S. C., Bauhus, J., Beese, W. J., Brodie, A., Kouki, J., Lindenmayer, D. B., Lõhmus, A., Pastur, G. M., Messier, C., Neyland, M., Palik, B., Sverdrup-Thygeson, A., Volney, W. J. A., Wayne, A., & Franklin, J. F. (2012). Retention forestry to maintain multifunctional forests: A world perspective. BioScience, 62(7), 633–645. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2012.62.7.6
- Gustafsson, L., Bauhus, J., Asbeck, T., Augustynczik, A. L. D., Basile, M., Frey, J., Gutzat, F., Hanewinkel, M., Helbach, J., Jonker, M., Knuff, A., Messier, C., Penner, J., Pyttel, P., Reif, A., Storch, F., Winiger, N., Winkel, G., Yousefpour, R., & Storch, I. (2020). Retention as an integrated biodiversity conservation approach for continuous-cover forestry in Europe. Ambio, 49(1), 85–97. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-019-01190-1
- Höhler, S., & Ziegler, R. (2010). Nature’s accountability: Stocks and stories. Science as Culture, 19(4), 417–430. DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2010.519609
- Hoogstra, M. A. (2008). Coping with the long term: An empirical analysis of time perspectives, time orientations, and temporal uncertainty in forestry. Zugl.: Wageningen, Univ., Diss, 2008. Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group Wageningen University.
- Hoogstra, M. A., & Schanz, H. (2009). Future orientation and planning in forestry: A comparison of forest managers’ planning horizons in Germany and the Netherlands. European Journal of Forest Research, 128(1), 1–11. DOI: 10.1007/s10342-008-0234-6
- Ivanoff, S. D., & Hultberg, J. (2006). Understanding the multiple realities of everyday life: Basic assumptions in focus-group methodology. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 13(2), 125–132. DOI: 10.1080/11038120600691082
- Kraus, D., Bütler, R., Krumm, F., Lachat, T., Larrieu, L., Mergner, U., Paillet, Y., Rydkvist, T., Schuck, A., & Winter, S. (2016). Catalogue of tree microhabitats – Reference field list. Bonn: European Forest Institute.
- Kraus, D., & Krumm, F. (Eds.) (2013). Integrative approaches as an opportunity for the conservation of forest biodiversity. Bonn: European Forest Institute.
- Kraus, D., Schuck, A., Krumm, F., Bütler, R., Cosyns, H., Courbaud, B., Larrieu, L., Mergner, U., Pyttel, P., Varis, S., Wilhelm, G., Witz, M., Zenner, E., & Zudin, S. (2018). Seeing is building better understanding – the Integrate+ Marteloscopes. Integrate+ Technical Paper No. 26:3.
- Kraus, D., Schuck, A., Schmitt, A., & Pyttel, P. (2015). The Rosskopf Marteloscope field guide. European Forest Institute. Integrate+ Technical Paper No. 3.
https://informar.eu/sites/default/files/pdf/20170111_Rosskopf_Booklet_Final.pdf Latest accessed February 10, 2020. - Kruse, J. (2015).
Qualitative Interviewforschung: Ein integrativer Ansatz (2., überarbeitete und ergänzte Auflage) . Grundlagentexte Methoden. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz Juventa. - Lamnek, S. (2005).
Gruppendiskussion: Theorie und Praxis (2., überarb. und erw. Aufl.) . UTB Psychologie, Pädagogik, Soziologie: Vol. 8303. Weinheim: Beltz.http://www.socialnet.de/rezensionen/isbn.php?isbn=978-3-8252-8303-2 - Louen, F., Striepen, K., Schölmerich, U., & Schuck, A. (2017). The Jägerhäuschen Marteloscope field guide. European Forest Institute. Integrate+ Technical Paper No. 24.
https://informar.eu/sites/default/files/pdf/20170620_Jaegerhaeuschen_Booklet_Final.pdf Latest accessed February 10, 2020. - Lowood, H. E. (1990). The calculating forester: Quantification, cameral science, and the emergence of scientific forestry management in Germany. The Quantifying Spirit in the 18th Century, 315–342.
- Maier, C., & Winkel, G. (2017). Implementing nature conservation through integrated forest management: A street-level bureaucracy perspective on the German public forest sector. Forest Policy and Economics, 82, 14–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.12.015
- Mascia, M. B., Brosius, J. P., Dobson, T. A., Forbes, B. C., Horowitz, L., McKean, M. A., & Turner, N. J. (2003). Conservation and the social sciences. Conservation Biology, 17(3), 649–650. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01738.x
- Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurth: Beltz.
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173 - Mendoza, G. A., & Martins, H. (2006). Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. Forest Ecology and Management, 230(1), 1–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.023
- Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A guide to design and interpretation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Messier, C. C., Puettmann, K. J., & Coates, K. D. (2014).
Managing forests as complex adaptive systems: Building resilience to the challenge of global change . Earthscan forest library. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. DOI: 10.4324/9780203122808 - Nicolini, D. (2017).
Is small the only beautiful? Making sense of ‘large phenomena’ from a practise-based perspective . In A. Hui, T. R. Schatzki, & E. Shove (Eds.), The nexus of practices: Connections, constellations and practitioners (pp. 98–113). London, New York: Routledge. - Nyumba, T. O., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12860
- Oesten, G., & Roeder, A. (2012). Management von Forstbetrieben: Band I, Grundlagen, Betriebspolitik (3., überarb. Aufl.). Inst. für Forstökonomie der Univ. Freiburg; Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek. Freiburg, Göttingen.
- Osei-Tutu, P., Pregernig, M., & Pokorny, B. (2014). Legitimacy of informal institutions in contemporary local forest management: insights from Ghana. Biodiversity and Conservation, 23(14), 3587–3605. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-014-0801-8
- Peltola, T., & Tuomisaari, J. (2015). Making a difference: Forest biodiversity, affective capacities, and the micro-politics of expert fieldwork. Geoforum, 64, 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.05.013
- Pommerening, A., Pallarés Ramos, C., Kędziora, W., Haufe, J., & Stoyan, D. (2018). Rating experiments in forestry: How much agreement is there in tree marking? PloS One, 13(3),
e0194747 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194747 - Pommerening, A., Vítková, L., Zhao, X., & Carlos, P. R. (2015). Towards understanding human tree selection behaviour. Forest Facts. Results from the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences 9.
- Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton: University Press.
http://www.loc.gov/catdir/description/prin031/94021440.html - Primmer, E. (2011). Analysis of institutional adaptation: Integration of biodiversity conservation into forestry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(16), 1822–1832. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.04.001
- Primmer, E., & Karppinen, H. (2010). Professional judgment in non-industrial private forestry: Forester attitudes and social norms influencing biodiversity conservation. Forest Policy and Economics, 12(2), 136–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.09.007
- Puettmann, K. J., Coates, K. D., & Messier, C. C. (2009). A critique of silviculture: Managing for complexity. Washington, DC: Island Press.
- Puettmann, K. J., Wilson, S. M., Baker, S. C., Donoso, P. J., Drössler, L., Amente, G., Harvey, B. D., Knoke, T., Lu, Y., Nocentini, S., Putz, F. E., Yoshida, T., & Bauhus, J. (2015). Silvicultural alternatives to conventional even-aged forest management – What limits global adoption? Forest Ecosystems, 2(1), 8. DOI: 10.1186/s40663-015-0031-x
- Reichertz, J. (2013). Gemeinsam interpretieren: Die Gruppeninterpretation als kommunikativer Prozess. Lehrbuch. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
http://www.socialnet.de/rezensionen/isbn.php?isbn=978-3-658-02533-5 - Schuck, A., Krumm, F., & Kraus, D. (2015).
Integrate+ Marteloscopes: Description of parameters and assessment procedures . Integrate+ Technical Paper No. 18. European Forest Institute.https://informar.eu/sites/default/files/pdf/20170113_Marteloscope_Methodology_Final.pdf Latest accessed February 10, 2020. - Scott, J. C. (1998).
Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed . The Yale ISPS series. New Haven, Conn: Yale Univ. Press. - Segura, M., Ray, D., & Maroto, C. (2014). Decision support systems for forest management: A comparative analysis and assessment. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 101, 55–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2013.12.005
- Sotirov, M., Sallnäs, O., & Eriksson, L. O. (2019). Forest owner behavioral models, policy changes, and forest management. An agent-based framework for studying the provision of forest ecosystem goods and services at the landscape level. Forest Policy and Economics, 103, 79–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.015
- Spinelli, R., Magagnotti, N., Pari, L., & Soucy, M. (2016). Comparing tree selection as performed by different professional figures. Forest Science, 62(2), 213–219. DOI: 10.5849/forsci.15-062
- Steinke, I. (2015).
Gütekriterien qualitativer Forschung . In U. Flick, E. V. Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), Rororo Rowohlts Enzyklopädie. Qualitative Forschung: Ein Handbuch (11th ed., pp. 319–331). Reinbek: Rowohlt-Taschenbuch-Verl. - Törnqvist, T. (1997). The socio-economic structure of small-scale forest ownership in Sweden. The Commonwealth Forestry Review, 76(1), 37–42.
- Vainio, A. (2011). Why are forest owners satisfied with forest policy decisions? Legitimacy, procedural justice, and perceived uncertainty. Social Justice Research, 24(3), 239–254. DOI: 10.1007/s11211-011-0136-5
- Vítková, L., Ní Dhubháin, Á., & Pommerening, A. (2016). Agreement in tree marking: What is the uncertainty of human tree selection in selective forest management? Forest Science, 62(3), 288–296. DOI: 10.5849/forsci.15-133
- von Detten, R., & Faber, F. (2013). Organizational decision making by German state-owned forest companies concerning climate change adaptation measures. Forest Policy and Economics, 35, 57–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.06.009
- von Detten, R., & Hanewinkel, M. (2017). Strategies of handling risk and uncertainty in forest management in central Europe. Current Forestry Reports, 3(1), 60–73. DOI: 10.1007/s40725-017-0050-7
- Wenger, E. (1998).
Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity . Learning in doing. Cambridge Univ. Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511803932 - Winkel, G., & Spellmann, H. (Eds.). (2019). BfN-Skripten: Vol. 542. Naturschutz im Landeswald: Konzepte, Umsetzung und Perspektiven. Ergebnisse des F+E-Vorhabens “Naturschutz im öffentlichen Wald” (FKZ 3513 84 0100). Bundesamt für Naturschutz.
https://efi.int/sites/default/files/files/publication-bank/2019/Winkel_Spellmann_Naturschutz_im_Landeswald_BfN-Skripten_542.pdf Latest accessed February 10, 2020. - Winter, S., Borrass, L., Geitzenauer, M., Blondet, M., Breibeck, R., Weiss, G., & Winkel, G. (2014). The impact of Natura 2000 on forest management: a socio-ecological analysis in the continental region of the European Union. Biodiversity and Conservation, 23(14), 3451–3482. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-014-0822-3
- Yousefpour, R., Jacobsen, J. B., Thorsen, B. J., Meilby, H., Hanewinkel, M., & Oehler, K. (2012). A review of decision-making approaches to handle uncertainty and risk in adaptive forest management under climate change. Annals of Forest Science, 69(1), 1–15. DOI: 10.1007/s13595-011-0153-4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/rl.60 | Journal eISSN: 2002-0104
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 3
Submitted on: Feb 17, 2020
Accepted on: Jun 8, 2020
Published on: Jul 7, 2020
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2020 Bettina Joa, Anne Paulus, Ronja Mikoleit, Georg Winkel, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.