Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Law and Order: The Evolution of Transitional Justice in Colombia from the Peace Process with the AUC (2003) to the FARC (2015) Cover

Law and Order: The Evolution of Transitional Justice in Colombia from the Peace Process with the AUC (2003) to the FARC (2015)

Iberoamericana – Nordic Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies
Volume 51 (2022): Issue 1
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Dec 2022
References

References

  1. ACR. 2014. Reintegración en Colombia. Hechos y datos [Reintegration in Colombia. Facts and Figures]. Available at: http://www.reintegracion.gov.co/es/lareintegracion/Documents/colombia_sept_2014_1.pdf (Accessed: 10 September 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. ACR. 2016a. ABC de la Ley 1424 de 2010: Elementos esenciales para comprender el diseño y el funcionamiento de la Ley 1424 de 2010 [ABC of Law 1424 of 2010: Essential elements to understand the design and function of LAW 1424 of 2010]. Available at: https://www.reincorporacion.gov.co/es/la-reintegracion/centro-de-documentacion/Documentos/Abecé%20de%20la%20Ley%201424.pdf (Accessed: 10 September 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. ACR. 2016b. 2016 Reintegration Yearbook: ACR at the Forefront of Post-Conflict. Available at: http://www.reintegracion.gov.co/en/Documents/reintegration_yearbook_2016.pdf. (Accessed: 12 September 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. ACR. 2017. Anuario de Reintegración 2017 El momento de afianzar lo aprendido [2017 Reintegration Yearbook: Time to Consolidate Lessons Learned]. Available at: http://www.reintegracion.gov.co/es/la-reintegracion/centro-de-documentacion/Documentos/Anuario%20ARN%202017.pdf (Accessed: 10 September 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Adams, M and Bomhoff, J. (eds.) 2012. Practice and Theory in Comparative Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511863301
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Bell, J. 2011. Legal Research and the Distinctiveness of Comparative Law. In: Van Hoecke, M (ed.), Methodologies of Legal research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 155–77.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Collins, H. 1991. Method and Aims of Comparative Law. In: Zweigert, K and Kötz, H (eds.), An Introduction to Comparative Law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 396–406. DOI: 10.1093/ojls/11.3.396
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Colombia Peace. 2019. Es posible que un 15% de las FARC se han rearmado. Available at: https://colombiapeace.org/es-posible-que-un-15-de-las-farc-se-han-rearmado/ (Accessed: 7 September 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Colombian Reintegration Agency [ACR]. 2013. Gray Book. Internal document. Unpublished.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Delgado, N, et al. 2014. Memorias: III Congreso de Responsabilidad Social Justicia Transicional y Escenarios de Reconciliación: ¿qué soy capaz de hacer por la paz y la reconciliación? [Memories: Third Congress of Social Transitional Justice Responsibility and Reconciliation Scenarios: What Can I Do for Peace and Reconciliation?]. Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. El Tiempo. 2018. Los ejércitos ilegales que enfrentará la nueva cúpula militar. 21 December. Available at: https://www.eltiempo.com/justicia/investigacion/los-ejercitos-ilegales-que-enfrentara-la-nueva-cupula-militar-305714. (Accessed: 4 September, 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. El Tiempo. 2019. Más de dos mil ‘exparas’ que se reincorporaron fueron asesinados. 25 July. Available at: https://www.eltiempo.com/justicia/conflicto-y-narcotrafico/mas-de-dos-mil-exparas-que-entraron-al-proceso-de-reincorporacion-fueron-asesinados-392612. (Accessed: 6 September 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Florez, D. et al. 2017. La inestabilidad jurídica, un reto para la reintegración de personas desmovilizadas de las AUC. In: Agencia para la Reincorporación y la Normalización (ARN) (ed.), El momento de afianzar lo aprendido. Anuario de reintegración 2017. Bogotá: ARN. pp. 242–254.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Fundación Ideas para la Paz (FIP). 2014. Retorno a la legalidad o reincidencia de excombatientes en Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: FIP.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. García-Godos, J and Lid, KAO. 2010. Transitional justice and victims’ rights before the end of a conflict: The unusual case of Colombia. Journal of Latin American Studies, 42(3): 487–516. DOI: 10.1017/S0022216X10000891
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. International Centre for Transitional Justice [ICTJ]. 2017. Antecedentes: Desmovilización de grupos paramilitares, ley de Justicia y Paz, Ley de Víctimas, diálogos de paz con las FARC [Background: The Demobilisation of Paramilitary Groups, The Justice and Peace Law, Peace Negotiations with the FARC]. Available at: https://www.ictj.org/es/our-work/regions-and-countries/colombia (Accessed: 10 September 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Jurisdicción Especial Para La Paz (JEP). 2022. Sistema Integral de Verdad Justicia Reparación y no Repetición (SIVJRNR). Available at: https://comisionverdadcol-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/SIVJRNR_ES-JEP.pdf (Accessed: 17 September 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Jurisdicción Especial Para La Paz (JEP). n.d. Leyes – Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz. Available at: https://www.jep.gov.co/Normativa/Paginas/Leyes.aspx (Accessed: 1 November 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Knight, M and Özerdam, A. 2004. Guns, Camps and Cash: Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reinsertion of Former Combatants. Journal of Peace Research, 41: 499–516. DOI: 10.1177/0022343304044479
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies. 2022. Cinco años después de la firma del Acuerdo Final: reflexiones desde el monitoreo a la implementación. University of Notre Dame.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Legrand, P and Munday, R. 2003. Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511522260
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. McEvoy, K and Shirlow, P. 2009. Re-imagining DDR Ex-combatants, leadership and moral agency in conflict transformation. Theoretical Criminology, 13(1): 31–59. DOI: 10.1177/1362480608100172
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. McFee, E and Rettberg, A. (eds.) 2019. Excombatientes y acuerdo de paz con las FARC-EP en Colombia: Balance de la etapa temprana. Bogotá, Colombia: Ediciones Uniandes. DOI: 10.30778/2019.39
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Melzer, N and Kuster, E. 2016. New IHL handbook: International Humanitarian Law: A Comprehensive Introduction. International Review of the Red Cross, 98(901): 353. DOI: 10.1017/S1816383117000091
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. National Council on Economic and Social Policy [CONPES]. 2008. Política nacional de reintegración social y económica para personas y grupos armados ilegales [National Policy on the Social and Economic Reintegration for Individuals and Illegal Armed Groups]. Bogotá, Colombia: National Planning Department.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Monroy, JR. 2022. La violencia se sigue ensañando contra familiares de ex-FARC: han sido asesinados 62. El Espectador, 1 August. Available at: https://www.elespectador.com/colombia-20/conflicto/ya-van-62-familiares-de-excombatientes-de-farc-asesinados-desde-la-firma-del-acuerdo-de-paz/ (10 September 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Nussio, E. 2009. ¿Reincidir o no? Conceptos de la literatura internacional aplicados al caso de desarme, desmovilización y reintegración de las Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia. Pensamiento Jurídico, 26: 213–236.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Nussio, E. 2011. How ex-combatants talk about personal security. Narratives of former paramilitaries in Colombia. Conflict, Security & Development, 11(5): 579–606. DOI: 10.1080/14678802.2011.641725
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Observatorio Internacional. 2009. Segundo Informe. Available at: http://www.toledopax.org/sites/default/files/CITpax_Segundo_Informe_Observatorio_DDR_Ley_Justicia_y_Paz_Colombia_noviembre_2009.pdf (Accessed: 13 September 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. O’Connor, K. 2020. Colombia’s Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz (JEP): An Effective Instrument of Transitional Justice. McGill Centre for Human Rights and Legal Pluralism, 8(1).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Office for the High Commissioner for Peace [OHCP]. 2016. Acuerdo Final para la Terminación del Conflicto y la Construcción de una Paz Estable y Duradera [Final Agreement to End the Armed Conflict and Build a Stable and Lasting Peace]. Available at: https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/Colombia%20Nuevo%20Acuerdo%20Final%2024%20Nov%202016_0.pdf (Accessed: 10 September 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Oppenheim, B and Söderström, J. 2017. Citizens by Design? Explaining Ex-Combatant Satisfaction with Reintegration Programming. The Journal of Development Studies. pp. 1–20. DOI: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00220388.2017.1288225?journalCode=fjds20.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Pham, P and Vinck, P. 2007. Empirical Research and the Development and Assessment of Transitional Justice Mechanisms. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 1(2): 231–248. DOI: 10.1093/ijtj/ijm017
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Piccone, T. 2019. Peace with Justice: The Colombian Experience with Transitional Justice. Washington, DC: USA. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/FP_20190708_colombia.pdf (Accessed: 1 November 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Ratner, SR and Slaughter, A. 1999. Appraising the Methods of International Law: A Prospectus for Readers. The American Journal of International Law, 93(2): 291–302. DOI: 10.2307/2997990
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Sacco, R. 1991. Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law (Instalment I of II). American Journal of Comparative Law, 39(1): 1–34. DOI: 10.2307/840669
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Sánchez Duque, LM. 2013a. Una defensa del Marco para la Paz [In Defence of the Peace Framework]. Available at: https://www.dejusticia.org/una-defensa-del-marco-para-la-paz/. (Accessed: 10 September 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Sánchez Duque, LM. 2013b. En torno al Marco Jurídico para la Paz: ¿qué tanto juzgar? [In regards to the Judicial Framework for Peace: How Much to Judge?]. Available at: https://www.dejusticia.org/en-torno-al-marco-juridico-para-la-paz-que-tanto-juzgar/ (Accessed: 12 September 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Sánchez León, NC and Marín López, D. 2017. Corporate accountability in transitional justice in Colombia. In: van de Sandt, J and Moor, M (eds.), Peace, everyone’s business!. Utrecht, The Netherlands: PAX. pp. 119–154.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Semana. 2017. Bienes: la prueba ácida para las Farc. 12 August. Available at: https://www.semana.com/nacion/articulo/bienes-la-prueba-acida-para-las-farc/536125/ (Accessed: 13 September 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Siems, M. 2014. Comparative Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Steffek, F. 2017. Comparative Law Research. Presented at the PHD Training Programme, Cambridge, UK.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Theidon, K. 2006. Justice in Transition: The Micropolitics of Reconciliation in Postwar Peru. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50: 1–25. DOI: 10.1177/0022002706286954
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Theidon, K. 2007. Transitional subjects: The disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of former combatants in Colombia. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 1(1): 66–90. DOI: 10.1093/ijtj/ijm011
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Tilly, C. 2005. Identities, boundaries, and social ties. New York: Paradigm Publishers.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Triana-E, S. 2019. Predicting and preventing criminal activities of Non-State Armed Group ex-combatants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. UK: University of Cambridge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. United Nations Verification Mission in Colombia [UN-VMC]. 2022. Report of the Secretary General. S/2022/513. Available at: https://colombia.unmissions.org/sites/default/files/infography_report_june_22.pdf (Accessed: 10 September 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Uprimny, Sánchez Duque & Sánchez León. 2014. Uprimny, 2016.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. Uprimny Yepes, R. 2016. ¿Cadena perpetua? El Espectador, 10 December. Available at: https://www.elespectador.com/opinion/opinion/cadena-perpetua-columna-669784 (Accessed: 10 September 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. Uprimny Yepes, R. 2017. ‘Responsabilidad del mando y JEP: un debate complejo y polarizado’ [Command Responsibility and the SJP: a complex and polarized debate], La Silla Vacía, February 27. Available at: https://www.lasillavacia.com/la-silla-vacia/opinion/articulos-columna/responsabilidad-del-mando-y-jep-un-debate-complejo-y-polarizado/ (Accessed: 10 September 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. Uprimny Yepes, R and Güiza Gómez, DI. 2016. La JEP: entre la cárcel y la justicia restaurativa [The Special Peace Jurisdiction: between jail and restorative justice]. Available at: https://www.dejusticia.org/en/the-special-peace-jurisdiction-between-jail-and-restorative-justice/ (Accessed: 11 September 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. Uprimny Yepes, R and Güiza Gómez, DI. 2017. Reflexiones sobre la reforma constitucional que crea la Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz y regula el tratamiento especial a Fuerza Pública [Reflections on the Constitutional Reform that creates the Special Jurisdiction for Peace and regulates the Special Treatment for the Armed Forces]. Available at: https://www.dejusticia.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/fi_name_recurso_909.pdf (Accessed: 10 September 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. Uprimny Yepes, R, Sánchez Duque, LM and Sánchez León, N. C. 2014. Justicia para la paz: Crímenes atroces, derecho a la justicia y paz negociada. [Justice to Achieve Peace: Heinous Crimes, the Right to Negotiated Peace and Justice]. Bogotá, Colombia: The Centre for the Study of the Law, Justice and Society, Dejusticia. Available at: https://www.dejusticia.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/fi_name_recurso_363.pdf. (Accessed: 8 September 2022).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. Uprimny Yepes, R and Sánchez León, NC. 2017. Transitional Justice in Conflict: Reflections on the Colombian Experience. In: Duthie, R and Seils, P (eds.), Justice Mosaics: How Context Shapes Transitional Justice in Fractured Societies. New York: International Centre for Transitional Justice. pp. 258–77.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/iberoamericana.553 | Journal eISSN: 2002-4509
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 79 - 94
Submitted on: Sep 26, 2022
Accepted on: Nov 10, 2022
Published on: Dec 12, 2022
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
transitional justice,
peace process,
reincorporation,
truth,
reparation,
reoffending

© 2022 Sergio Triana-E, Leah Grace, Josefin Wulkan, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 51 (2022): Issue 1
Previous article