Entre la democracia y la tecnocracia: El debate sobre la autonomía del Banco Central en Chile y Uruguay en tiempos del Consenso de Washington
By: Adolfo Garcé and Alejo González
References
- Alcántara, M y Luna, JP. 2004. Ideología y competencia partidaria en dos post-transiciones: Chile y Uruguay en perspectiva comparada. Revista de Ciencia Política, XXIV(1): 128–168. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-090X2004000100006
- Alesina, A. 1988. Macroeconomic and politics. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 3: 13–52. DOI: 10.1086/654070
- Alesina, A y Summers, L. 1993. Central Bank Independence and Macroeconomic Performance: Some Comparative Evidence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 25(2): 151–162. DOI: 10.2307/2077833
- Alesina, A y Tabellini, G. 1987. Rules and discretion with non-coordinated monetary and fiscal policy. Economic Inquiry, 25: 619–630. DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1987.tb00764.x
- Antía, F. 2018. The politics of redistribution in unequal democracies: center-left governments in Chile and Uruguay in comparative perspective. Latin American Perspectives, 46(1): 152–166. DOI: 10.1177/0094582X18806827
- Bade, R y Parkin, M. 1982.
Central Banks Laws and Monetary Policy . Manuscrito inédito. Universidad de Western Ontario. - Banda, A, De Brun, J, Moraes JA y Oddone, G. 2018.
Una Contribución a la Historia del Banco Central (1967–2017) . Banco Central del Uruguay- ORT. - Barro, R y Gordon, D. 1983. Rules, Discretion and Reputation in a Model of Monetary Policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12: 101–121. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3932(83)90051-X
- Baudean, M. 2017.
La creación de bancos centrales en América del Sur en la década de 1930. El caso de Uruguay . En: Marichal, C y Gambi, T (eds.), Historia bancaria y monetaria de América Latina (siglos XIX y XX): nuevas perspectivas. Santander: Editorial de la Universidad de Cantabria; Alfenas, Brasil: Universidade Federal de Alfenas. pp. 339–396. - Bértola, L, Calicchio, L, Camou, M y Porcile, G. 2012.
Southern Cone real wages compared: a purchasing power parity approach to convergence and divergence trends, 1870 – 1996 . Documentos de Trabajo, 19. Montevideo: Programa de Historia Económica y Social – Unidad Multidisciplinaria. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. - Bertsou, E y Caramani, D. 2020. The Technocratic Challenge to Democracy. Routledge: Oxon-New York. DOI: 10.4324/9780429342165
- Bertsou, E y Pastorella, G. 2017. Technocratic attitudes: a citizens’ perspective of expert decision-making. West European Politics, 40(2): 430–458, DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2016.1242046
- Bianchi Larre, A. 2016.
La independencia del Banco Central de Chile: los años iniciales . en Álvarez, L y Naudon, A (2016). 25 años de autonomía del banco central de Chile. Santiago: Banco Central de Chile. - Biglaiser, G. 2002. Guardians of the nation? Economists, generals, and economic reform in Latin America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
- Boylan, D. 2001. Defusing Democracy: Central Bank Autonomy and the Transition from Authoritarian Rule. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.17319
- Broz, JL. 1998. The Origins of Central Banking: Solutions to the Free-Rider Problem. International Organization, 52(2): 231–268. DOI: 10.1162/002081898753162811
- Campbell, JL y Pedersen, O. 2011.
Knowledge Regimes and Comparative Political Economy . En: Béland, D y Cox, R (eds.), Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 167–190. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199736430.003.0009 - Campbell, JL y Pedersen, O. 2014. The National Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400850365
- Caramani, D. 2017. Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government. American Political Science Review, 111(1): 54–67. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055416000538
- Centeno, MA. 1993. The new Leviathan: The dynamics and limits of technocracy. Theory and Society, 22(3): 307–335. DOI: 10.1007/BF00993531
- Centeno, MA y Silva, P. 1998. The Politics of Expertise in Latina America. New York: McMillan Press. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-26185-7
- Céspedes, LF y Valdés, R. 2006. Autonomía de Bancos Centrales: La experiencia chilena. Economía Chilena, 9(1): 25–45.
- Corbo, V y Hernández, L. 2005. Ochenta años de historia del Banco Central de Chile. Economía Chilena, 8(3): 5–27
- Cukierman, A. 1986. Central Bank Behavior and Credibility: Some Recent Theoretical Developments. Saint Luis: Federal Reserve Bank. DOI: 10.20955/r.68.5-17.him
- Cukierman, A. 2008. Central bank independence and monetary policymaking institutions. Past, present and future. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(4): 722–736. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2008.07.007
- Cukierman, A, Webb, S y Neypati, B. 1992. Measuring the Independence of Central Banks and Its Effect on Policy Outcomes. The World Bank economic review, 6(3): 353–398. DOI: 10.1093/wber/6.3.353
- Dargent, E. 2015. Technocracy and Democracy in Latina America. The Experts Running Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107446663
- Drake, P. 1989. The Money Doctor in the Andres. The Kemmerer Missions, 1923–1933. Durham and London: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv11cw52m
- Fernández-Albertos, J. 2015. The Politics of Central Bank Independence. Annual Review of Political Science, 18: 217–37. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-071112-221121
- Fuhrer, J. (ed.). 1994. Goals, Guidelines and Constraints Facing Monetary Policymakers. Boston: Federal Reserve Bank.
- Gárate Chateau, M. 2012. La revolución capitalista de Chile (1973–2003). Desde la tradición del liberalismo decimonónico (1810–1970) a la búsqueda de una utopía neoconservadora (1973–2003). Santiago de Chile: Universidad Alberto Hurtado.
- Garcé, A. 2009.
Economics, Economists and Politics in Uruguay (1942–1999) . En: Markoff, J y Montecinos, V (eds.), Economists in the Americas. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. - Garcé, A. 2015. Political-Knowledge Regimes: Building a New Concept from Selected Policy-Change Events in the Tabaré Vázquez Administration (Uruguay, 2005–2009). World Political Science Review, 11(1): 23–45. DOI: 10.1515/wpsr-2014-0020
- Garcé, A. 2017. Regímenes Políticos de Conocimiento: tecnocracia y democracia en Chile y Uruguay, Dossier “Política y producción de conocimiento en América Latina”. MILLCAYAC – Revista Digital de Ciencias Sociales, IV(7):17–48.
- Garcé, A, D’Avenia, L, López, C y Villegas Plá, B. 2018. Political Knowledge Regimes and Policy Change. On Think Tank Series. Working Paper.
Bath University-Universidad del Pacífico . - Garriga, AC. 2016. Central Bank Independence in the World: A New Data Set. International Interactions, 42(5): 849–868. DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2016.1188813
- Garriga, AC. 2016–2017. Independencia de los bancos centrales: La “sabiduría convencional” a la luz de nuevos datos. STUDIA POLITICÆ, 40: 105–130. DOI: 10.22529/sp.2016-2017.40.05
- Gerring, J. 2016. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Goodman, J. 1991. The politics of central bank independence. Comparative Politics, 23(3): 329–49. DOI: 10.2307/422090
- Grilli, V, Masciandaro, D y Tabellini, G. 1991. Political and Monetary Institutions and Public Financial Policies in the Industrial Countries. Economic Policy, 13: 341–392. DOI: 10.2307/1344630
- Gunnell, JG. 1982. The Technocratic Image and the Theory of Technocracy. Technology and Culture, 23(3): 392–416. DOI: 10.2307/3104485
- Harriett, S, Garcé, A, Torrelli, M y Pose, N. 2018. Historia del Banco Central del Uruguay (1967–2016). Medio siglo de desarrollo institucional al servicio de la estabilidad económica. Instituto de Ciencia Política. Inédito.
- Hibbs, D. 1977. Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy. American Political Science Review, 71: 1467–1487. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055400269712
- Jácome, L. 2001. Legal Central Bank Independence and Inflation in Latin America During the 1990s. IMF Working Paper, WP/01/212. DOI: 10.5089/9781451874891.001
- Jácome, L y Vázquez, F. 2005. Any link between legal central bank Independence and inflation? Evidence from Latin America and Caribbean. IMF Working Paper, WP/05/75. DOI: 10.5089/9781451860948.001
- Joignant, A y Güell, P. (eds.). 2011. Notables, tecnócratas y mandarines. Elementos de sociología de las elites en Chile (1990–2010). Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales.
- Kydland, FE y Prescott, EC. 1977. Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans. The Journal of Political Economy, 85(3): 473–492. DOI: 10.1086/260580
- Lanzaro, J. 2004. Fundamentos de la democracia pluralista y estructura política del Estado en el Uruguay. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 14(1): 103–135.
- Lora, E. 2012.
“Las reformas estructurales en América Latina: Qué se ha reformado y cómo medirlo (Versión actualizada)” . Documento de trabajo del BID. Washington, DC: IDB-WP-346 - Lüders, R, Díaz, J y Wagner, G. 2016. La República en cifras. Historical statistics. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Universidad Católica.
- Luna, JP y Alcántara, M. 2004. Estructuración ideológica y competencia programática: Los partidos Chilenos y Uruguayos en perspectiva comparada. Revista de Ciencia Política, 24(1): 128–168. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-090X2004000100006
- Matus, M. 2011. Crecimiento sin desarrollo: Precios y salarios reales durante el Ciclo Salitrero en Chile (1880–1930). Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
- Maxfield, S. 1998. Gatekeepers of Growth: The International Political Economy of Central Banking in Developing Countries. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400822287
- Montecinos, V. 2009.
Economics: The Chilean Story . En: Montecinos, V y Markoff, J (eds.), Economists in the Americas. Cheltenham y Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781849803465 - Montecinos, V y Markoff, J. 1993. The Ubiquitous Rise of Economists. Journal of Public Policy, 13(1): 37–8. DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X00000933
- Nahum, B, et al. 2016. Memoria histórica de los primeros 114 años de trayectoria institucional del Banco de la República 1896–2010. Montevideo: BROU.
- Pastorella, G. 2016. Technocratic governments in Europe: getting the critique right. Political Studies, 64(4): 948–965. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.12217
- Persson, T y Tabellini, G. 1993. Designing Institutions for Monetary Stability. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39: 53–84. DOI: 10.1016/0167-2231(93)90003-F
- Polillo, S y Guillén, MF. 2005. Globalization Pressures and the State: The Worldwide Spread of Central Bank Independence. American Journal of Sociology, 110(6): 1764–1802. DOI: 10.1086/428685
- Rapaport, O, Levi-Faur, D y Miodownik, D. 2009. The Puzzle of the Diffusion of Central-Bank Independence Reforms: Insights from an Agent-Based Simulation. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4): 695–716. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00331.x
- Real de Azúa, C. 1984. Uruguay: ¿una sociedad amortiguadora? Montevideo: CIESU.
- Rivarola Puntigliano, A. 2003. Mirrors of Change: A Study of Industry Associations in Chile and Uruguay. Stockholm.
- Rodríguez Weber, J. 2014.
La Economía Política de la Desigualdad de Ingreso en Chile, 1850–2009 . Tesis de Doctorado. Programa de Historia Económica. FCS-UDELAR. - Rogoff, K. 1985. “The Optimal Degree of Commitment to an Intermediate Monetary Target”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100(4): 1169–1189. DOI: 10.2307/1885679
- Seguí, L y Natero, H. 1985. El proceso fundacional del Banco Central del Uruguay. Montevideo: BCU.
- Silva, P. 2008. In the name of reason: technocrats and politics in Chile. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
- Valencia Sáiz, A. 1995. La teoría política en la era de la tecnocracia. En: Vallespín, F (ed.), Historia de la Teoría Política, Tomo 6: 433–453.
- Williamson, J. 1998.
Revisión del consenso de Washington . En: Emergí, L (ed.), El desarrollo económico y social en los umbrales del siglo XXI. Washington: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/iberoamericana.496 | Journal eISSN: 2002-4509
Language: English
Page range: 74 - 84
Published on: Oct 23, 2020
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2020 Adolfo Garcé, Alejo González, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.