Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Institutions and Policy Choices: The New Left in Brazil Cover
By:  and    
Open Access
|Jun 2019

References

  1. Abranches, SH. 1988. Presidencialismo de coalizão: o dilema institucional brasileiro. Dados, 31(1): 538.
  2. Aldrighi, DM and Postali, FAS. 2010. “Business Groups in Brazil,” pp. 253286. In Colpan, AM, Hikino, T, Lincoln, JR (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552863.003.0013
  3. Alston, LJ and Mueller, B. 2006. Pork for Policy: Executive and Legislative Exchange in Brazil. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 22(1): 87114. DOI: 10.1093/jleo/ewj001
  4. Alves, S, Dantas, RF and Nadotti, VX. 2016. “O PT contra as políticas de direita no Brasil.” https://fpabramo.org.br/csbh/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2017/05/14-PT_Contra_Politicas_Direita_noBrasil.pdf.
  5. Ames, B. 1995. Electoral Rules, Constituency Pressures, and Pork Barrel: Bases of Voting in the Brazilian Congress. The Journal of Politics, 52(2): 324343. DOI: 10.2307/2960309
  6. Ardanaz, M, Scartascini, C and Tommasi, M. 2010. Political Institutions, Policymaking, and Economic Policy in Latin America. Working Paper no. 158. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1575310
  7. Bachiller, JV. 2016. “As Privatizações à Nova Estratégia de Desenvolvimento. A Trajetória do BNDES entre 1990 e 2010.” Desenvolvimento em Questão, 14(36) (October–December): 530. DOI: 10.21527/2237-6453.2016.36.5-30
  8. Baer, W and Bang, JT. n.d. Privatization and Equity in Brazil and Russia. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.
  9. Baker, A. 2010. The Market and the Masses in Latin America: Policy Reform and Consumption in Liberalizing Economies. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511576447
  10. Balbachevsky, E and Holzhacker, DO. 2006. Determinantes das atitudes do eleitorado brasileiro com relação à privatização e aos serviços públicos. Opinião Pública, 12: 1. DOI: 10.1590/S0104-62762006000100002
  11. Ban, C. 2013. Brazil’s Liberal Neo-Developmentalism: Edited Orthodoxy or New Policy Paradigm? Review of International Political Economy, 20(2): 298331. DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2012.660183
  12. Bloomberg. 2015. Eletrobras Sued in U.S. Over Bribery Scheme. July 23.
  13. Bresser, P and Carlos, L. 2004. Novo-desenvolvimentismo. Folha de São Paulo. 19 September.
  14. Chong, A and López de Silanes, F. 2005. The Truth about Privatization in Latin America. In Chong, A, and López de Silanes, F (eds.), Privatization in Latin America: Myths and Reality. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press; Washington: World Bank. DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-5882-5
  15. Coelho, A. 2017. Corporate Governance and State-Owned Firms: the case of Brazil. In Ngwu, FN, Osuji, OK and Stephen, F, (eds.), Corporate Governance in Developing and Emerging Markets. New York: Routledge.
  16. D’Orto, D. 2000. Political Parties and Their Influence on Brazilian State Enterprise Privatization. Paper prepared for XXII Latin American Studies Congress, Miami, Florida; March 16–18.
  17. Döring, H, Santos, Rd and Pocher, E. 2017. New Developmentalism in Brazil? The Need for Sectoral Analysis. Review of International Political Economy, 24(2): 332362. DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2016.1273841
  18. Eckstein, H. 2002. Case Study and Theory in Political Science. In Gomm, R, Hammersley, M, and Foster, P, (eds.), Case study method: Key Issues, Key Texts. London: Sage Publications.
  19. Erikson, R. 2015. Income Inequality and Policy Responsiveness. Annual Review of Political Science, 18(May): 1129. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-020614-094706
  20. Evans, PB. 1979. Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780691186801
  21. Figueiredo, AC and Limongi, F. 2000. “Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil,” Comparative Politics, 32(2): 151170. DOI: 10.2307/422395
  22. Financial Times. 2017a. Brazil’s state-controlled companies pursue reinvention. June 8.
  23. Financial Times. 2017b. Brazil’s development bank BNDES faces reform. August 30.
  24. Flores-Macías, GA. 2010. Statist vs. Pro-Market: Explaining Leftist Governments’ Economic Policies in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 42(4): 413433. DOI: 10.5129/001041510X12911363510033
  25. Franco Chuaire, M, Scartascini, C and Tommasi, M. 2017. State capacity and the quality of policies. Revisiting the relationship between openness and government size. Economics and Politics, 29(2): 133156. DOI: 10.1111/ecpo.12090
  26. GaúzaZH. 2017. Rombo sem fundo: Fundos de pensão de estatais têm déficits bilionários e segurados pagam a conta. September 22. https://gauchazh.clicrbs.com.br/economia/noticia/2017/09/fundos-de-pensao-de-estatais-tem-deficits-bilionarios-e-segurados-pagam-a-conta-cj7wfjpfy001e01mj5nh9644r.html. Accessed October 21, 2017.
  27. Haber, S, Klein, HS and Sousa, R. 2003. Lula’s Moment. Hoover Digest 1 (January). https://www.hoover.org/research/lulas-moment.
  28. Henisz, W. 2004. Political Institutions and Policy Volatility. Economics and Politics, 16(1): 127. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0343.2004.00129.x
  29. Hunter, W. 2010. The Transformation of the Workers’ Party in Brazil, 1989–2009. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511763304
  30. Jensen, MC and Meckling, WH. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 30560. DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  31. Jones, M and Hwang, W. 2005. Party Government in Presidential Democracies: Extending Cartel Theory beyond the U.S. Congress. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2): 267282. DOI: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00122.x
  32. Kane, K and Christiansen, H. 2015. State-owned enterprises: Good governance as a facilitator for development. Coherence for Development, 5(April): 112.
  33. Kingstone, P. 2011. The Political Economy of Latin America: Reflections on Neoliberalism and Development. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203882603
  34. Koivumaeki, R-I. 2015. Evading the Constraints of Globalization: Oil and Gas Nationalization in Venezuela and Bolivia. Comparative Politics, 48(19): 107125. DOI: 10.5129/001041515816075169
  35. Latinobarómetro. 2003. Informe-Resumen: La Democracia y la Economía. Santiago de Chile: Latinobarómetro.
  36. Latinobarómetro. 2009. Report 2009. Santiago de Chile: Latinobarómetro.
  37. Levitsky, S and Roberts, K. (eds.) 2011. The Resurgence of the Latin American Left. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  38. Maciel, SNP. 2013. Dos trabalhadores, para o povo brasileiro: uma análise comparativa dos programas de governo do Partido dos Trabalhadores de 1989 e 2002. M.A. Thesis, University of Brasília. http://repositorio.unb.br/bitstream/10482/13718/1/2013_SuellenNetoPiresMaciel.pdf.
  39. Martínez-Gallardo, C and Murillo, MV. 2011. Agency under Constraint: Ideological Preferences and the Politics of Electricity Regulation in Latin America. Regulation and Governance, 5: 3 (September): 350367. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2011.01114.x
  40. Mollo, MdLR and Filho, AS. 2006. “Neoliberal Economic Policies in Brazil (1994–2005): Cardoso, Lula and the Need for a Democratic Alternative.” New Political Economy, 11(1): 99123. DOI: 10.1080/13563460500494933
  41. Mora y Araújo, M. 1991. Ensayo y error. Buenos Aires: Planeta.
  42. Musacchio, A and Lazzarini, S. 2016. The Reinvention of State Capitalism in Brazil, 1970-2012. In Ben Ross Schneider, ed. New Order and Progress: Democracy and Development in Brazil. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190462888.003.0005
  43. North, D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511808678
  44. Pavón Mediano, A. 2018. Agencies’ formal independence and credible commitment in the Latin American regulatory state: A comparative analysis of 8 countries and 13 sectors. Forthcoming, Regulation & Governance. DOI: 10.1111/rego.12187
  45. Post, A and Murillo, MV. 2016. How Investor Portfolios Shape Regulatory Outcomes: Privatized Infrastructure After Crises. World Development, 77: 328345. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.08.006
  46. Power, T and Zucco, C. 2009. “Estimating Ideology of Brazilian Legislative Parties, 1990–2005: A Research Communication,” Latin American Research Review, 44(1): 218246. DOI: 10.1353/lar.0.0072
  47. PR Newswire. 2017. Former Petrobras CEO targeted by Car Wash corruption probe. July 27.
  48. Reid, M. 2014. Brazil: The Troubled Rise of a Global Power. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  49. Reuters. 2017. Brazil stocks hit six-year high on Eletrobras privatization. August 22.
  50. Rhodes, S. 2006. Social Movements and Free-Market Capitalism in Latin America: Tele-communications Privatization and the Rise of Consumer Protest. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  51. Samuels, DJ. 2002. Pork Barreling Is Not Credit Claiming or Advertising: Campaign Finance and the Sources of the Personal Vote in Brazil. The Journal of Politics, 64(3): 846863. DOI: 10.1111/0022-3816.00149
  52. Savas, ES. 1987. Privatization: The Key to Better Government. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
  53. Shleifer, A and Vishny, RW. 1997. A Survey of Corporate Governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2): 737784. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
  54. Sierra, J. 2015. Partners at home and abroad: How Brazil globalized state-led-development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brown University, Rhode Island.
  55. Smith, S, Valle, S and Schmidt, B. 2015. The Betrayal of Brazil. Bloomberg Markets. June.
  56. Spiller, P and Tommasi, M. 2007. The Institutional Foundations of Public Policy in Argentina: A Transactions Cost Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511818219
  57. Tanoira, M. 1987. Privatization as Politics. In Hanke, S (ed.), Privatization and Development. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.
  58. Tautz, CSF, de Andrade Ramos, F, Pinto, JRL, Serra, PA and Serra, RV. 2014. The “State-of-the-Art” of State-Owned Enterprises in Brazil. International Budget Partnership.
  59. Weyland, K. 2010. The Performance of Leftist Governments in Latin America: Conceptual and Theoretical Issues. In Weyland, K, Madrid, R, and Hunter, W, (eds.), The Performance of Leftist Governments in Latin America: Successes and Shortcomings. New York Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511778742
  60. World Bank. 2006. Held by the Visible Hand: The Challenge of SOE Corporate Governance for Emerging Markets. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  61. Yergin, D and Stanislaw, J. 1998. The Commanding Heights: The Battle for the World Economy. New York: Free Press.
  62. Zeckhauser, R and Horne, M. 1989. The Control and Performance of State-Owned Enterprises. In MacAvoy, PW, Stanbury, WT, and Yarrow, G, (eds.), Privatization and State-Owned Enterprises: Lessons from the United States, Great Britain, and Canada. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Language: English
Page range: 40 - 52
Published on: Jun 27, 2019
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2019 Carlos Rufín, Luigi Manzetti, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.