Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Latin American Stereotypes in Finnish Social Media Cover
Open Access
|Oct 2018

References

  1. Academy of Finland Programme Digital Humanities. 2016–2019. Online access at: https://www.aka.fi/en/research-and-science-policy/academy-programmes/current-programmes/digihum/ and http://blogs.helsinki.fi/pakkasvi/files/2010/10/Poster_DigiHum.pdf last accessed 28 September 2018.
  2. Allport, GW. 1954. The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
  3. Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
  4. Bar-Tal, D. 1997. “Formation and change of ethnic and national stereotypes: An integrative model”. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 21(4): 491523. DOI: 10.1016/S0147-1767(97)00022-9.
  5. Bennett, WL and Segerberg, A. 2012. The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5): 739768. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
  6. Billig, M. 1995. Banal nationalism. London: Sage.
  7. Borg, S. 2012. “Perussuomalaiset”. In: Borg, S (ed.), Muutosvaalit 2011, 191226. Oikeusministeriö, Helsinki.
  8. Capozza, D, et al. 2009. “Americans are barbarians or allies? Images of Americans in the Italian social context”. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31(3): 6068. DOI: 10.1080/01973530802659893.
  9. Cuddy, AJC, et al. 2009. “Stereotype Content Model across Cultures: Towards Universal Similarities and Some Differences.” The British journal of social psychology/the British Psychological Society, 48(1): 133. DOI: 10.1348/014466608X314935
  10. Drewelow, I. 2011. American learners of French and their stereotypes of the French language and people: A survey and its implications for teaching. The French Review, 84(4): 748762.
  11. Durante, F, et al. 2017. Ambivalent stereotypes link to peace, conflict, and inequality across 38 nations. PNAS, 114(4): 669674. January 24, 2017. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1611874114
  12. Finnish Internet site statistics. Online access at: https://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/FI last accessed 28 September 2018.
  13. Fiske, ST, et al. 2007. Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(4): 7783. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
  14. Glick, P, et al. 2006. Anti-American sentiment and America’s perceived intent to dominate: An 11-nation study. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28: 363373. DOI: 10.1207/s15324834basp2804_10.
  15. Goodman, N. 1978. Ways of Worldmaking. Hackett Publishing Company. Indianapolis & Cambridge.
  16. Hall, S (ed.) 1997. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage Publications in association with The Open University.
  17. Harju, A. 2018. Suomi24 keskustelut kohtaamisten ja törmäysten tilana. Media & viestintä, 41(1): 5174. DOI: 10.23983/mv.69952.
  18. Helbling, M, Reeskens, T and Wright, M. 2016. The mobilisation of identities: A study on the relationship between elite rhetoric and public opinion on national identity in developed democracies. Nations & Nationalism, 22(4): 744767. [serial online]. October 2016.
  19. Huntington, S. 1996. The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  20. Koselleck, R. 2002. The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Stanford University Press.
  21. Lagus, K, Pantzar, M, Ruckenstein, M and Ylisiurua, M. 2016. Suomi24 – Muodonantoa aineistolle. Kuluttajatutkimuskeskus, Valtiotieteellisen tiedekunnan julkaisuja, 10. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto.
  22. Madon, S, et al. 2001. Ethnic and National Stereotypes: The Princeton Trilogy Revisited and Revised. Personality Social Psychology Bulletin, 27: 996. DOI: 10.1177/0146167201278007
  23. Magdy, W, Darwish, K and Weber, I. 2015. #FailedRevolutions: Using Twitter to Study the Antecedents of ISIS Support. Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1503.02401.
  24. McCage, C. (ed.) 2009. Prejudice. Farmington Hills: Greenhaven Press, Cengage Learning.
  25. Moscovici, S. 1988. “Notes towards a description of Social Representations.” European Journal of Social Psychology, 18: 211250. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420180303
  26. Nairn, T. 2005. Faces of Nationalism: Janus Revisited. London: Verso.
  27. Niemi, MK. 2013. “The True Finns Identity Politics and Populist Leadership on the Threshold of the Party’s Electoral Triumph”. Javnost – The Public, 20(3): 7791. DOI: 10.1080/13183222.2013.11009121.
  28. O’Sullivan, T, et al. 1994. Key Concepts in Communication and Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.
  29. Pakkasvirta, J. 2008. “From Pulp to Fiction? Fray Bentos Pulp Investment Conflict through the Finnish Media”. Cooperation & Conflict, Sage, 43(4): 421447. DOI: 10.1177/0010836708096883.
  30. Pakkasvirta, J. 2010. Fábricas de celulosa: Historias de la globalización. Editorial La Colmena: Buenos Aires.
  31. Pakkasvirta, J. 2014. Notes on theory of nationalism. In: Multi-layered Historicity of the Present: Approaches to Social Science History, Haggrén, H, Rainio-Niemi, J and Vauhkonen, J (eds.), 7592. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Political and Economic Studies, (Publications of the Department of Political and Economic Studies; no. 8).
  32. Pakkasvirta, J and Saukkonen, P. (eds.) 2005. Nationalismit. Helsinki: WSOY.
  33. Palonen, E and Saresma, T. 2017. Jätkät & Jytkyt. Perussuomalaiset ja populismin retoriikka, Vastapaino: Tampere.
  34. Phalet, K and Poppe, E. 1997. “Competence and morality dimensions of national and ethnic stereotypes: A study in six eastern-European countries”. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27: 703723. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199711/12)27:6<;703::AID-EJSP841>3.0.CO;2-K.
  35. Rosenthal, A. 1999. The gender-coded stereotype: An American perception of France and the French. The French Review, 72(5): 897908.
  36. Sammut, G. 2015. Attitudes, social representations and point of view. In: Sammut, G, Andreouli, E, Gaskell, G and Valsiner, J (eds.), Handbook of Social Representations, 96112. Cambridge University Press.
  37. Sassen S. 2003. “Globalization or Denationalization”. Review of International Political Economy, 10(1): 122. DOI: 10.1080/0969229032000048853.
  38. Savage, M. 2013. The ‘Social Life of Methods’: A Critical Introduction. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(4): 321. DOI: 10.1177/0263276413486160.
  39. Stephan, WG, et al. 1993. Measuring stereotypes: A comparison of methods using Russian and American samples. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56(1): 5464. DOI: 10.2307/2786645.
  40. Stereotypes of Hispanic and Latino Americans. Online access at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereotypes_of_Hispanic_and_Latino_Americans_in_the_United_States last accessed 28 September 2018.
  41. Suomi24 site. Online access at: https://www.suomi24.fi/ last accessed 28 September 2018.
  42. University of Turku, on-line stereotype-map 2018. Online access at: https://goo.gl/NIFa0D last accessed 28 September 2018.
  43. Willnat, L, He, Z and Xiaoming, H. 1997. Foreign media exposure and perceptions of Americans in Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and Singapore. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(4): 738756. DOI: 10.1177/107769909707400406
  44. Ylä-Anttila, T. 2017. The Populist Toolkit: Finnish Populism in Action 2007–2016. Publications of the Faculty of Social Sciences 59, University of Helsinki: Unigrafia (PhD dissertation: https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/224199).
  45. Ylä-Anttila, T. 2018. Populist knowledge: ‘Post-truth’ repertoires ofcontesting epistemic authorities. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology. DOI: 10.1080/23254823.2017.1414620
Language: English
Page range: 94 - 107
Published on: Oct 22, 2018
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2018 Jussi Pakkasvirta, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.