Supporting the Legitimacy of Quality Criteria for Multimodal Production in School
References
- ATC21S. (n.d.). Retrieved 30 June 2017, from Assessment & Teaching of 21st Century Skills website:
http://www.atc21s.org/ . - Baldwin, K. M. (2016). Multimodal Assessment in Action: What We Really Value in New Media Texts (Dissertation, University of Massachusetts – Amherst). Retrieved 28 June 2019 from
https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1778&context=dissertations_2 - Barthes, R. (1994). I tegnets tid. Utvalgte artikler og essay. [In the era of the sign. Selected articles and essays]. Oslo: Pax.
- Bearne, E. (2009).
Assessing Multimodal Texts . In Assessing New literacies. Perspectives from the Classroom. New York: Peter Lang. - Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–144. DOI: 10.1177/003172171009200119
- Bräuner, K. (2014). Forberedelsestid i reformfolkeskolen. [Preparation time in the school of the reform]. Retrieved 23 June 2019, from Folkeskolen.dk website:
https://www.folkeskolen.dk/551496/forberedelsestid-i-reformfolkeskolen - Bremholm, J., Bundsgaard, J., Fougt, S. S., & Skyggebjerg, A. K. (2017).
Danskfaget set gennem dets læremidler. [The subject of Danish seen through its teaching aids] . In Læremidlernes Danskfag. Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag. - Bundsgaard, J., Pettersson, M., & Puck, M. R. (2014). Digitale kompetencer: it i danske skoler i et internationalt perspektiv. [Digital competences: IT in Danish schools in an international perspective]. Aarhus: Åarhus Universitetsforlag.
- Burke, A. (2009).
Checkmarks on the Screen: Questions of Assessment and New Literacies in the Digital Age . In Assessing New Literacies. Perspectives from the Classroom. (pp. 35–54). New York: Peter Lang. - Chandler, D. (2000). An Introduction to Genre Theory. Retrieved from
http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/intgenre/chandler_genre_theory.pdf - Christensen, O., Gynther, K., & Petersen, T. B. (2012). Design-Based Research – introduktion til en forskningsmetode i udvikling af nye E-læringskoncepter og didaktisk design medieret af digitale teknologier. [Design-Based Research – introduction to a method of research in the development of new e-learning concepts and designs for learning mediated by digital technologies]. Læring og Medier (LOM), Årg, 5(9), 20. DOI: 10.7146/lom.v5i9.6140
- Cobb, P., & Gravemeijer, K. (2008).
Experimenting to Support and Understand Learning Processes . In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of Design Research Methods in Education: Innovations in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning and Teaching (pp. 68–95). New York: Routledge. - Dahler-Larsen, P. (2013). Evaluering af projekter - og andre ting, som ikke er ting. [Evaluation of projects—and other things that are not things]. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
- Drotner, K. (2016). Børn og unges arbejde med film: Digital dannelse og produktiv læring for fremtiden. [Film making by children and youth: Digital literacy and productive learning for the future]. Det Danske Filminstitut.
- Erstad, O. (2010). Digital kompetanse i skolen (2. udgave). [Digital competence in school]. Oslo: Universitetesforlaget.
- Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for Life in a Digital Age: The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study International Report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-14222-7
- Hattie, J. (2008). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203887332
- Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. DOI: 10.3102/003465430298487
- Hattie, J., & Yates, G. C. R. (2013). Visible Learning and the Science of How We Learn. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315885025
- Hodgson, J., Rønning, W., Skogvold, A. S., & Tomlinson, P. (2010). Paa vei fra læreplan til klasserom – Om læreres fortolkning, planlegging og syn paa LK06. [On the way from curriculum to classroom—On teacher’s interpretation, planning and view of LK06]. Nordland Research Institute.
- Hung, H.-T., Chiu, Y.-C. J., & Yeh, H.-C. (2013). Multimodal Assessment of and for Learning: A Theory-Driven Design Rubric. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 400–409. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01337.x
- Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, Literacy, Learning: A Multimodal Approach. Routledge.
- Jewitt, C. (2007). A multimodal perspective on textuality and contexts. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 15(3), 275–289. DOI: 10.1080/14681360701601937
- Kennedy-Clark, S. (2013). Research by Design: Design-Based Research and the Higher Degree Research student. Journal of Learning Design, 6(2), 26–32. DOI: 10.5204/jld.v6i2.128
- Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203299234
- Kress, G., & Selander, S. (2012). Multimodal Design, Learning and Cultures of Recognition. Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 265–268. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.12.003
- Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse. The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Hodder Arnold Publication.
- Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203619728
- Kringstad, T., & Kvithyld, T. (2013). Fem prinsipper for god skriveopplæring. [Five principles for good writing instruction]. Bedre Skole, 2013(2), 71–79.
- Kvithyld, T., & Aasen, A. J. (2011). Fem teser om funksjonell respons på elevtekster. [Five theses on functional response to student texts]. Viden om læsning, 2011(9), 10–16.
- Levy, M., & Kimber, K. (2009). Developing an Approach for Comparing Students’ Multimodal Text Creations: A Case Study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(4), 489–508. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1125
- Løvland, A. (2007). På mange måtar. Samansette tekstar i skolen. [In many ways. Composite texts in school]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
- Løvland, A. (2009).
Sammensatte fagtekster – en multimodal udfordring? [Composite subject-oriented texts—a multimodal challenge?] In At læse i alle fag (pp. 123–141). Århus: Forlaget Klim. - Lüders, M., Prøitz, L., & Rasmussen, T. (2010). Emerging personal media genres. New Media & Society, 12(6), 947–963. DOI: 10.1177/1461444809352203
- Maagerø, E., & Tønnesen, E. S. (2014). Multimodal tekstkompetanse. [Multimodal text competence]. Portal.
- Mainz, P. (2016, May 31). Lærere har 14 minutters forberedelse til hver time. [Teachers have 14 minutes of preparation for each lesson]. Retrieved 23 June 2019, from Politiken website:
https://politiken.dk/indland/uddannelse/art5623967/Lærer-har-14-minutters-forberedelse-til-hver-time - McKenney, S., Nieveen, N., & van den Akker, J. (2006). Design research from a curriculum perspective. Educational Design Research, 67–90. DOI: 10.4324/9780203088364
- Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as Social Action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167. DOI: 10.1080/00335638409383686
- Nikolajeva, M., & Scott, C. (2000). The Dynamics of Picturebook Communication. Children’s Literature in Education, 31(4), 225–239. DOI: 10.1023/A:1026426902123
- Philippakos, Z. A., & MacArthur, C. A. (2016). The Use of Genre-Specific Evaluation Criteria for Revision. The Language and Literacy Spectrum, 26, 41–52.
- Selander, S. (2008). Designs for Learning – A Theoretical Perspective. Designs for Learning, 1(1). DOI: 10.16993/dfl.5
- Selander, S., & Kress, G. (2012). Læringsdesign – i et multimodalt perspektiv. [Learning design—in a multimodal perspective]. København: Frydenlund.
- Skovmand, K., & Hansen, T. I. (2011). Fælles mål og midler: læremidler og læreplaner i teori og praksis. [Common objectives and means: teaching aids and curriculum in theory and practice]. Århus: Klim.
- Sloth, M. F., Hansen, R., & Bremholm, J. (2016). Elevopgaver og elevproduktion i det 21. århundrede – en kvantitativ og kvalitativ analyse af elevproduktion i matematik, dansk og naturfag. [Student assignments and student production in the 21st century—a quantitative and qualitative analysis of student production in Math, Danish and Science]. Retrieved from Læremiddel.dk website:
https://www.google.com/search?q=sloth+elevopgaver&rlz=1C1GCEA_enDK797DK797&oq=sloth+elevopgaver&aqs=chrome..69i57.3644j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 - Sørensen, B. H., Audon, L., & Levinsen, K. T. (2010). Skole 2.0. [School 2.0]. Klim.
- Sørensen, B. H., Levinsen, K. T., Skovbjerg, H. M., Ejsing-Duun, S., Henningsen, B., Tosca, S., & Bremholm, J. (2016). Slutevalueringsrapport. December 2015: Projekt. Elevers egenproduktion og elevinddragelse. [Final evaluation report. December 2015: Project. Students’ production and student involvement]. Retrieved from Aalborg Universitet website:
https://www.uvm.dk/-/media/filer/uvm/udd/folke/pdf16/mar/160314-evalueringsrapport--elevernes-egenproduktion-og-elevinddragelse.pdf - The New London Group. (1996). A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93. DOI: 10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
- The Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2015, May). P21 Framework Definitions. Retrieved from
http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_Framework_Definitions_New_Logo_2015.pdf - Undervisningsministeriet. (n.d.-a). Dansk – Fælles Mål, læseplan og vejledning. [Danish—common objectives, instruction plans and guidelines]. Retrieved 28 March 2017, from EMU Danmarks læringsportal website:
http://www.emu.dk/modul/dansk-m%C3%A5l-l%C3%A6seplan-og-vejledning%20 - Undervisningsministeriet. (n.d.-b). It og medier. [IT and media]. Retrieved 28 March 2017, from EMU Danmarks læringsportal website:
http://www.emu.dk/modul/it-og-medier-0 - Undervisningsministeriet. (n.d.-c). It og medier - vejledning. [IT and media—guidelines]. Retrieved 29 May 2017, from EMU Danmarks læringsportal website:
http://www.emu.dk/modul/it-og-medier-vejledning - Undervisningsministeriet. (n.d.-d). Vejledning for faget historie. [Guidelines for the subject of History]. Retrieved 28 March 2017, from EMU Danmarks læringsportal website:
http://www.emu.dk/modul/vejledning-faget-historie - UNESCO. (2011). Media and Information Literacy Curriculum for Teachers. Retrieved from
http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/resources/publications-and-communication-materials/publications/full-list/media-and-information-literacy-curriculum-for-teachers/ - Vandervelde, J. (2018). Video Project Rubric. Retrieved 25 June 2019, from UW-Stout website:
https://www2.uwstout.edu/content/profdev/rubrics/videorubric.html - van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203647028
- Warren, L. L. (2000). Teacher Planning – A Literature Review. Educational Research Quarterly, 24(2).
- Wille, T. S. (2012). Vurdering for læring i klasserummet. [Assessment for learning in the classroom]. Frederikshavn: Dafolo.
- Wølner, T. A. (2015). Kriteriebaseret vurdering. [Criteria-based assessment]. Århus: Klim.
- Wyatt-Smith, C., & Kimber, K. (2009). Working multimodally: Challenges for assessment. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(3), 70–90.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.119 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 12
Submitted on: Jul 3, 2018
Accepted on: Dec 10, 2019
Published on: Jan 8, 2020
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2020 Mikkeline Blatt Hoffmeyer, Jesper Juellund Jensen, Marie Veisegaard Olsen, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.