The potential of using resources from systems change theory to strengthen metascience
By: Alice Gibson
References
- Abercrombie, R., Boswell, K., & Thomasoo, R. (2018). Thinking big: How to use theory of change for systems change. New Philanthropy Capital,
https://www.thinknpc.org/resource-hub/thinking-big-how-to-use-theory-of-change-for-systems-change/ (accessed 24 April 2026). - Abson, D. J., Fischer, J., Leventon, J., Newig, J., Schomerus, T., Vilsmaier, U., von Wehrden, H., Abernethy, P., Ives, C. D., Jager, N. W., & Lang, D. J. (2017). Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio, 46(1), 30–39. 10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y (accessed 16 April 2026).
- Barkhuizen, N., Rothmann, R., & Van De Vijver, F. J. (2013). Burnout and work engagement of academics in higher education institutions: Effects of dispositional optimism. Stress and Health, 30(4), 322–332. 10.1002/smi.2520 (accessed 1 May 2026).
- Birney, A. (2021). How do we know where there is potential to intervene and leverage impact in a changing system? The Practitioners perspective. Sustainability Science, 16(3), 749–765. 10.1007/s11625-021-00956-5 (accessed 16 April 2026).
- Chan, J. K. H., & Xiang, W.‑N. (2022). Fifty years after the wicked‑problems conception: Its practical and theoretical impacts on planning and design. Socio‑Ecological Practice Research, 4(1), 1–6.
- D’Anna, F., Jareborg, N., Jetten, M., Ahokas, M., Alper, P., Andrews, R., Bösl, K., D’Altri, T., Faria, D., & Fatima, N. (2024). A research data management (RDM) community for ELIXIR. F1000Research, 13(ELIXIR), 230. 10.12688/f1000research.146301.2 (accessed 24 April 2026).
- Ehrlichman, D. (2021). Impact networks: Create connection, spark collaboration, and catalyze systemic change. Berrett‑Koehler Publishers.
- Gibson, A. (2025). The Crick’s data archive: Supporting best practice in research data integrity ‑ poster displayed at Crick spring technology meeting, Tuesday 29th April 2025. The Francis Crick Institute, 10.25418/crick.29168411 (accessed 24 April 2026).
- Goldman, G., & Chenoweth, E. (2025). Scientists’role in defending democracy. Science, 389(6761), 667. 10.1126/science.aea9328 (accessed 16 April 2026).
- Kania, J., Kramer, M., & Senge, P. (2018). The water of systems change. FSG,
https://www.fsg.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/The-Water-of-Systems-Change_rc.pdf (accessed 24 April 2026). - Kun, Á. (2018). Publish and who should perish: You or science? Publications, 6(2), 18. 10.3390/publications6020018 (accessed 24 April 2026).
- Larsson, T., Plonsky, L., Sterling, S., Kytö, M., Yaw, K., & Wood, M. (2023). On the frequency, prevalence, and perceived severity of questionable research practices. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(3), 100064. 10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100064 (accessed 16 April 2026).
- Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage points‑places to intervene in a system. Sustainability Institute,
https://donellameadows.org/wp-content/userfiles/Leverage_Points.pdf (accessed 24 April 2026). - Meadows, D. (2008). Thinking in systems: International bestseller. Chelsea Green Publishing,
https://books.google.co.uk/books?vid=ISBN9781603580557&;printsec=frontcover&;redir_esc=y#v=onepage&;q&;f=true (accessed 24 April 2026). - Murphy, R. J. A., & Jones, P. (2021). Towards systemic theories of change: High‐leverage strategies for managing wicked problems. Design Management Journal, 16(1), 49–65. 10.1111/dmj.12068 (accessed 24 April 2026).
- Nagy, T., Hergert, J., Elsherif, M. M., Wallrich, L., Schmidt, K., Waltzer, T., Payne, J. W., Gjoneska, B., Seetahul, Y., & Wang, Y. A. (2025). Bestiary of questionable research practices in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 8(3), 25152459251348431. 10.1177/25152459251348431 (accessed 24 April 2026).
- Nelles, J., & Vorley, V. (2025).
The applications of metascience to research and innovation systems . In S. Abdul‑Rahman, L. Tuckerman, J. Nelles, & T. Vorley (Eds.), Innovations in innovation policy (pp. 305–320). Edward Elgar Publishing, 10.4337/9781035322206.00027 (accessed 24 April 2026). - Nurse, P. (2023). Independent review of the UK’s research, development and innovation organisational landscape: Final report and recommendations. Department for Science, Innovation and Technology.
- Omodeo, P. D., Bondì, R., Borrelli, A., Garau, R., Giannini, G., Granada, M. Á., Hirai, H., Mulsow, M., Nenci, E., Ordine, N., Ottaviani, A., Renn, J., Suitner, R., & Trabucco, O. (2019). Bernardino Telesio and the Natural Sciences in the Renaissance. Brill,
https://brill.com/display/title/35643?srsltid=AfmBOorSR155Ct8Lx7K8T0GEpB8QFG7NPcqUqZ3TwghWqeEJdwvLXocH (accessed 24 April 2026). - Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research. (1992). Responsible science: Ensuring the integrity of the research process (Vol. 2). National Academies Press.
- Pfortmüller, F., & Luchsinger, N. (2013). The power of trust: Learnings from six years of building a global community of young leaders. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 8(3), 43–54. 10.1162/INOV_a_00186 (accessed 24 April 2026).
- Richardson, R. A. K., Hong, S. S., Byrne, J. A., Stoeger, T., & Nunes Amaral, L. A. (2025). The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(32), e2420092122. 10.1073/pnas.2420092122 (accessed 24 April 2026).
- Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. 10.1007/BF01405730 (accessed 16 April 2026).
- Rubin, M. (2023). Questionable metascience practices. Journal of Trial & Error, 4(1). 10.36850/mr4 (accessed 24 April 2026).
- Senge, P. (1994). The Fifth Discipline. Crown.
https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/_/mmclolCJ0AkC?hl=en&gl=uk&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjF5NqY1IaUAxWDRUEAHWOZOI8Qre8FegQILhAW (accessed 27 April 2026). - van der Aalst, W. M. P., Hinz, O., & Weinhardt, C. (2023). Ranking the ranker: How to evaluate institutions, researchers, journals, and conferences? Business & Information Systems Engineering, 65(6), 615–621. 10.1007/s12599-023-00836-5 (accessed 24 April 2026).
- Ventsel, M., & Montague‑Hellen, B. (2025). Researchers and research data: Improving and incentivising sharing and archiving. International Journal of Digital Curation, 19(1), 10. 10.2218/v19i1.983 (accessed 24 April 2026).
- Willis, C. D., Mitton, C., Gordon, J., & Best, A. (2012). System tools for system change. BMJ Quality & Safety, 21(3), 250–262. 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000482 (accessed 16 April 2026).
- Wilsdon, J., Brasil, A., Waltman, L., & Steyn, B. (2025). Annex to “A Year in Metascience”: The past, present and future of UK metascience.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/685bcd40c07c71e5a87097d1/the-past-present-future-of-uk-metascience.pdf (accessed 24 April 2026). - Wolfe, K. (2025). The impact of high‑performance work practices on employee burnout experience in UK higher education: A professional services perspective. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 29(1), 3–13. 10.1080/13603108.2024.2392165 (accessed 16 April 2026).
- Woolley, R., & Stack, S. (2024). Research careers and research assessment reform: A “Public Values” perspective. 10.5281/zenodo.14162538 (accessed 24 April 2026).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.738 | Journal eISSN: 2048-7754
Language: English
Page range: 8 - 8
Submitted on: Sep 18, 2025
Accepted on: Oct 23, 2025
Published on: May 19, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year
Keywords:
© 2026 Alice Gibson, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.