References
- 1Lai Ma, Jane Buggle, and Marie O’Neill, “Open access at a crossroads: library publishing and bibliodiversity,” Insights 36, no. 10 (May 23): 1–8, DOI: 10.1629/uksg.613 (accessed 13 October 2023.
- 2Stephen Buranyi, “Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science?,” Guardian, 27 June 17,
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science (accessed 13 October 2023). - 3“About Us,” SPARC Europe,
https://sparceurope.org/who-we-are/about-us/ (accessed 13 October 2023). - 4“About,” COPIM, About (
copim.ac.uk ) (accessed 13 October 2023). - 5James Wilsdon et al., The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management, 2015, DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363 (accessed 13 October 2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473978782
- 6Stephen J. Eglen, et al., “An open letter from UK researchers to UK library directors regarding the UK’s reliance on read-and-publish deals with journal publishers,” Open letter, (2023),
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZAlPDvECb5Zm1pqAf0I1f0sjcBqPbkPGMvGIhaCz6lM/edit (accessed 13 October 2023). - 7Ma et al., “Open access at a crossroads.”
- 8Ma et al., “Open access at a crossroads.”
- 9Diego Ponte, Bozena I. Mierzejewska, and Stefan Klein, “The transformation of the academic publishing market: multiple perspectives on innovation,” Electronic Markets 27, (2017): 97–100, DOI: 10.1007/s12525-017-0250-9 (accessed 12 October 2023).
- 10International Network of Research Management Societies – Research Evaluation Group (Melbourne: The SCOPE Framework, University of Melbourne, 2023), DOI: 10.26188/21919527.v1 (accessed 13 October 2023).
- 11“About DORA”, DORA, About DORA|DORA (
sfdora.org ) (accessed 13 October 2023).