References
- Jeffrey Beall, “Predatory Publishers Are Corrupting Open Access,” Nature 489 (September 12, 2012): 179, https://www.nature.com/articles/489179a (accessed 23 August 2023); Andrew Silver, “Controversial Website that Lists ‘Predatory’ Publishers Shuts Down,” Nature (January 18, 2017),
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2017.21328 (accessed 23 August 2023). - Gonzalo Marco-Cuenca, José Antonio Salvador-Oliván, and Rosario Arquero-Avilés, “Fraud in Scientific Publications in the European Union. an Analysis through Their Retractions,” Scientometrics 126, no. 6 (2021): 5143–64, DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-03977-0 (accessed 23 August 2023).
- Agnes Grudniewicz et al., “Predatory Journals: No Definition, No Defence.” Nature 576, no. 7786 (2019): 210–12, DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y (accessed 23 August 2023).
- Grudniewicz et al., “Predatory Journals.”
- Grudniewicz et al., “Predatory Journals.”
- Marcelo S. Perlin, Takeyoshi Imasato, and Denis Borenstein. “Is Predatory Publishing a Real Threat? Evidence from a Large Database Study,” Scientometrics 116, no. 1 (2018): 255–73, DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2750-6 (accessed 24 August 2023).
- Subhra Priyadarshini, “India Tops Submissions in Predatory Journals.” Nature News, (September 6, 2017),
https://www.nature.com/articles/nindia.2017.115 (accessed 24 August 2023). - “Home,” Consortium for Academic and Research Ethics (UGC-Care), University Grants Commission,
https://ugccare.unipune.ac.in/apps1/home/index (accessed 24 August 2023). - Jingfeng Xia et al., “WHO Publishes in ‘Predatory’ Journals?” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66, no. 7 (2014): 1406–17, DOI: 10.1002/asi.23265 (accessed 24 August 2023); W.E. Nwagwu, “Open Access in the Developing Regions: Situating the Altercations About Predatory Publishing / L’accès libre dans les régions en voie de développement : Situation de la controverse concernant les pratiques d’édition déloyales,” Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 40, no. 1 (2016): 58–80,
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/611577 (accessed 24 August 2023). - Sefika Mertkan, Gulen Onurkan Aliusta, and Nilgun Suphi, “Profile of Authors Publishing in ‘Predatory’ Journals and Causal Factors behind Their Decision: A Systematic Review,” Research Evaluation 30, no. 4 (2021) 470–483, DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvab032 (accessed 24 August 2023).
- Nicole Shu Ling Yeo-Teh and Bor Luen Tang, “Wilfully Submitting to and Publishing in Predatory Journals - a Covert Form of Research Misconduct?,” Biochemia medica 31, no. 3 (2021): 395–402, DOI: 10.11613/bm.2021.030201 (accessed 24 August 2023).
- Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira, “Predatory Journals and Meetings in Forensic Sciences: What Every Expert Needs to Know about This ‘Parasitic’ Publishing Model,” Forensic Sciences Research 6, no. 4 (2021): 303–9, DOI: 10.1080/20961790.2021.1989548 (accessed 24 August 2023).
- Bo-Christer Björk, Sari Kanto-Karvonen, and J. Tuomas Harviainen. “How Frequently Are Articles in Predatory Open Access Journals Cited,” ArXiv, (2019),
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1912/1912.10228.pdf (accessed 24 August 2023). - Alexander Avidan, and Joel Shapiro, “Citation of Studies by Research Fraudsters in Medical Journals,” British Journal of Anaesthesia 130, no. 3 (2023), DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.11.022 (accessed 24 August 2023).
- Anna Abalkina and Dorothy V. M. Bishop, “Paper Mills: A Novel Form of Publishing Malpractice Affecting Psychology,” PsyArXiv Preprints, (September 5, 2022), DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/2yf8z (accessed 24 August 2023).
- Kyle Siler et al., “Predatory Publishers’ Latest Scam: Bootlegged and Rebranded Papers,” Nature 598, no. 7882 (2021): 563–65, DOI: 10.1038/d41586-021-02906-8 (accessed 24 August 2023).
- Siler et al., “Predatory Publishers’ Latest Scam.”
- Varun G. Menon, “Hijacked Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them,” Clarivate (blog), July 20, 2021,
https://clarivate.com/blog/hijacked-journals-what-they-are-and-how-to-avoid-them/ (accessed 24 August 2023). - “Choosing the right conference to attend and present your research.” Think. Check. Attend., May 16, 2022,
https://thinkcheckattend.org/ (accessed 24 August 2023). - Holly Else, “Multimillion-Dollar Trade in Paper Authorships Alarms Publishers,” Nature 613, no. 7945 (2023): 617–18, DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-00062-9 (accessed 24 August 2023).
- Cameron Neylon, “Blacklists Are Technically Infeasible, Practically Unreliable and predatory. Period,” Web log, January 29, 2017,
https://cameronneylon.net/blog/blacklists-are-technically-infeasible-practically-unreliable-and-unethical-period/ (accessed 31 August 2023); Christophe Dony et al., “How Reliable and Useful Is Cabell’s Blacklist? A Data-Driven Analysis” LIBER Quarterly 30, no. 1 (2020): 1–20, DOI: 10.18352/lq.10339 (accessed 24 August 2023). - “Identify Trusted Publishers for Your Research, Think. Check. Submit,” Think. Check. Submit, May 16, 2022,
https://thinkchecksubmit.org/ (accessed 24 August 2023). - “Why Index Your Journal in DOAJ?,” Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ),
https://doaj.org/apply/why-index/ (accessed 24 August 2023). - “Technical Guidance and Requirements,” Plan S, European Science Foundation,
https://www.coalition-s.org/technical-guidance_and_requirements/ (accessed 24 August 2023). - “Postulación Scielo-Chile,”
Documento sin título . SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online,https://www.scielo.cl/sr_scielocl/postulacion/PostulacionSciELO-Chile.html (accessed 24 August 2023). - Samantha Cukier et al., “Checklists to Detect Potential Predatory Biomedical Journals: A Systematic Review,” BMC Medicine 18, no. 1 (2020), DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01566-1 (accessed 24 August 2023).
- “Be INFORMEd!” Duke University Medical Centre Library,
https://kansascity.libguides.com/ld.php?content_id=55623651 (accessed 24 August 2023). - “Open Access Journal Quality Indicators,” GVSU Libraries: Scholarly Communications, Grand Valley State University,
https://www.gvsu.edu/library/sc/open-access-journal-quality-indicators-5.htm (accessed 24 August 2023). - “Journals and Publishers That Falsely Claim They Are Indexed in DOAJ,” Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ),
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Y_Sza4rPDkf-NNX9kwiErGrKeNTM75md9B63A_gVpaQ/edit#gid=0 (accessed 24 August 2023). - “The Retraction Watch Hijacked Journal Checker,” Web log, Retraction Watch,
https://retractionwatch.com/the-retraction-watch-hijacked-journal-checker/ (accessed 24 August 2023). - Think.Check.Submit, “Identify Trusted Publishers for Your Research.”
- Think.Check.Attend, “Choosing the Right Conference.”
- Teresa Abejon Peña et al., “Identification and Treatment of Spurious Journals in Latindex, Guide for Editors,” Zenodo, 2020, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5586863 (accessed 31 August 2023).
- “How it works,” B!SON,
https://service.tib.eu/bison/how (accessed 24 August 2023). - “Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing,” COPE: Committee on Publication Ethics,
https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing (accessed 24 August 2023). - Combatting Predatory Academic Journals and Conferences (Full Report in English), (The InterAcademy Partnership (IAP),
March 2022 ),https://www.interacademies.org/publication/predatory-practices-report-English (accessed 24 August 2023). - Simon Linacre, The Predator Effect: Understanding the Past, Present and Future of Deceptive Academic Journals, (Ann Arbor, MI: Against the Grain (Media), LLC, 2022), DOI: 10.3998/mpub.12739277 (accessed 24 August 2023).
- “Predatory Publishing,” COPE: Committee on Publication Ethics,
https://publicationethics.org/predatory-publishing-discussion-document (accessed 24 August 2023).
