Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Five ways to optimize open access uptake after a signed read and publish contract: lessons learned from the Dutch UKB consortium Cover

Five ways to optimize open access uptake after a signed read and publish contract: lessons learned from the Dutch UKB consortium

Insights
Volume 35 (2022): Issue 0
By: Arjan Schalken  
Open Access
|Oct 2022

Figures & Tables

uksgi-35-595-g1.png
Figure 1

WUR Journal Browser showing researchers from Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam a journal that is part of a consortium agreement

uksgi-35-595-g2.png
Figure 2

WUR Journal Browser showing researchers from University Utrecht a journal that is not part of a consortium agreement and the option to use the general Open Access Fund instead

uksgi-35-595-g3.png
Figure 3

A general dashboard from the UKB datahub

uksgi-35-595-g4.png
Figure 4

Part of the cap monitoring dashboard (anonymized)

uksgi-35-595-g5.png
Figure 5

The ‘Missed Open Access’ dashboard in heat map modus (anonymized). Darker colours indicate higher numbers of missed open access

uksgi-35-595-g6.png
Figure 6

OA licence types of articles published in consortium deals, 2019 – 2022 (first Quarter). Source: UKB datahub 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.595 | Journal eISSN: 2048-7754
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 10, 2022
Accepted on: Jul 4, 2022
Published on: Oct 19, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year
Keywords:
open access,
consortia,
read and publish deals,
UKSG Conference 2022,
Netherlands,
UKB

© 2022 Arjan Schalken, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 35 (2022): Issue 0Next article