References
- 1Philip G. Altbach, “Globalisation and the University: Myths and Realities in an Unequal World,” Tertiary Education & Management 10, no. 1 (2004): 3–25, DOI: 10.1080/13583883.2004.9967114 (accessed 26 May 2022).
- 2OAPEN Foundation, OAPEN Foundation Stakeholder Report 2021: Key Results and Developments, The Hague, 2022,
https://oapen.fra1.digitaloceanspaces.com/90b36d1e9131442480030e48076ac263.pdf (accessed 25 May 2022). - 3Emanuel Kulczycki, et al., “Publication Patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities: Evidence from Eight European Countries,” Scientometrics 116, no. 1 (1 July 2018): 463–86, DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2711-0 (accessed 25 May 2022); Emanuel Kulczycki et al., “Multilingual Publishing in the Social Sciences and Humanities: A Seven-Country European Study,” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 71, no. 11 (2020): 1371–85, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24336 (accessed 26 May 2022).
- 4Ana Balula and Delfim Leão, “Multilingualism within Scholarly Communication in SSH. A Literature Review,” JLIS.It 12, no. 2 (15 May 2021): 88–98, DOI: 10.4403/jlis.it-12672 (accessed 25 May 2022).
- 5Nhlanhla Mkhize and Nobuhle Ndimande-Hlongwa, “African Languages, Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS), and the Transformation of the Humanities and Social Sciences in Higher Education,” Alternation 21, no. 2 (2014): 10–37,
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Cheryl-Potgieter/publication/328928144_Humanities_Knowledge_Production_and_Transformation/links/5bebe025299bf1124fd12257/Humanities-Knowledge-Production-and-Transformation.pdf#page=15 (accessed 25 May 2022). - 6John Flowerdew and Yongyan Li, “English or Chinese? The Trade-off between Local and International Publication among Chinese Academics in the Humanities and Social Sciences,” Journal of Second Language Writing 18, no. 1 (1 March 2009): 1–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.09.005 (accessed 25 May 2022).
- 7Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Sandra Miguel, and Félix de Moya-Anegón, “What Factors Affect the Visibility of Argentinean Publications in Humanities and Social Sciences in Scopus? Some Evidence beyond the Geographic Realm of Research,” Scientometrics 102, no. 1 (1 January 2015): 789–810, DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1414-4 (accessed 25 May 2022).
- 8Ronald Snijder, “Evaluating the Impact of the FWF-E-Book-Library Collection in the OAPEN Library: An Analysis of the 2014 Download Data,” D-Lib Magazine 21, no. 7/8 (2015), DOI: 10.1045/july2015-snijder (accessed 25 May 2022).
- 9Ronald Snijder,
“Patterns of Information – Clustering Books and Readers in Open Access Libraries,” In The Deliverance of Open Access Books: Examining Usage and Dissemination, (Amsterdam University Press, 2019) 83–103, DOI: 10.26530/OAPEN_1004809 (accessed 30 May 2022). - 10Cameron Neylon et al., “More Readers in More Places: The Benefits of Open Access for Scholarly Books,” Insights 34, no. 1 (1 December 2021): 27, DOI: 10.1629/uksg.558 (accessed 25 May 2022).
- 11Ronald Snijder, “Open Access Book Usage Data – How Close Is COUNTER to the Other Kind?,” Insights 34, no. 1 (28 April 2021): 9, DOI: 10.1629/uksg.539 (accessed 25 May 2022).
- 12“7.0 Processing Rules for Underlying COUNTER Reporting Data,” COUNTER, accessed 28 October 2020,
https://www.projectcounter.org/code-of-practice-five-sections/7-processing-rules-underlying-counter-reporting-data/ (accessed 25 May 2022). - 13Snijder, ‘Open Access Book Usage Data – How Close Is COUNTER to the Other Kind?’
- 14Ronald Snijder, “Words Algorithm Collection – Finding Closely Related Open Access Books Using Text Mining Techniques,” LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries 31, no. 1 (24 August 2021) DOI: 10.53377/lq.10938 (accessed 25 May 2022).
- 15Antonia Aelterman et al., eds., Professional Learning in Education (Academia Press, 2016),
https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31077 (accessed 25 May 2022). - 16Daniel Miller et al., How the World Changed Social Media (UCL Press, 2016), DOI: 10.14324/111.9781910634493 (accessed 25 May 2022).
- 17H.A. Hernández García et al., eds., Tratamiento biológico de aguas residuales: principios, modelación y diseño (IWA Publishing, 2017), DOI: 10.2166/9781780409146 (accessed 25 May 2022).
- 18Melanie Bergmann, Lars Gutow, and Michael Klages, eds., Marine Anthropogenic Litter (Springer Nature, 2015), DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3 (accessed 25 May 2022).
- 19Hernández García et al., Tratamiento biológico de aguas residuales; Maurizio Ferraris, Manifiesto del Nuevo Realismo (Ariadna Ediciones, 2012), DOI: 10.26530/OAPEN_617573 (accessed 25 May 2022).
- 20SciELO Livro,
https://books.scielo.org/en/ (accessed 25 May 2022). - 21OpenEdition Books,
https://books.openedition.org/ (accessed 25 May 2022).