References
- 1Michelle Reale, The Indispensable Academic Librarian: Teaching and Collaborating for Change (Chicago: ALA Editions, 2018), 79.
- 2Sarah E. Thomas and Carl A. Kroch,
“Not Just a Box of Books: From Repository to Service Innovator,” in Digital Convergence – Libraries of the Future, eds. Rae Earnshaw and John Vince, (London: Springer, 2008), 173–180, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84628-903-3_14 (accessed 11 October 2021). - 3Kate-Riin Kont, “How to Optimize the Cost and Time of the Acquisitions Process?,” Collection Building 34, no. 2 (April 2015): 41–50, DOI: 10.1108/CB-01-2015-0003 (accessed 6 October 2021).
- 4Allen Kent et. al., Use of Library Materials: The University of Pittsburgh Study (New York: Marcel Dekker, 1979).
- 5Larry Hardesty, “Use of Library Materials at a Small Liberal Arts College,” Collection Management 10, no.3–4 (
Fall 1988): 61–80, DOI: 10.1300/J105v10n03_05 (accessed 6 October 2021). - 6Sheila Cheung, Terry Chung, and Frederick Nesta, “Monograph Circulation Over a 15-Year Period in a Liberal Arts University,” Library Management 32, no.6–7 (July 2011): 419–434, DOI: 10.1108/01435121111158565 (accessed 6 October 2021).
- 7Herman Fussler and Julian Simon, Patterns in the Use of Books in Large Research Libraries (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969).
- 8Quentin L. Burrell, “A Note on Ageing in a Library Circulation Model,” Journal of Documentation 41, no. 2 (1985): 100–115, DOI: 10.1108/eb026775 (accessed 11 October 2021).
- 9Kensuke Baba, Toshiro Minami, and Tetsuya Nakatoh, “Predicting Book Use in University Libraries by Synchronous Obsolescence,” Procedia Computer Science 96 (2016): 395–402, DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.08.082 (accessed 11 October 2021).
- 10D. Kaye Gapen and Sigrid P Milner, “Obsolescence,” Library Trends 30, no. 1 (1981): 107–124; Maurice B. Line, “Changes in the Use of Literature with Time – Obsolescence Revisited,” Library Trends 41, no. 4 (
Spring 1993): 665–684. - 11Edward T. O’Neill and Julia A Gammon, “Consortial Book Circulation Patterns: The OCLC-OhioLINK Study,” College & Research Libraries 75, no. 6 (2014): 791–807. DOI: 10.5860/crl.75.6.791
- 12Amy Fry, “Use Patterns for Ebooks: The Effects of Subject, Age and Availability on Rate of Use,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 46, no. 3 (May 2020): 102150, DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102150 (accessed 7 October 2021).
- 13Tony Becher and Paul Trowler, Academic Tribes and Territories (Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, 1989).
- 14Anthony Biglan, “The Characteristics of Subject Matter in Different Academic Areas,” Journal of Applied Psychology 57, no. 3 (June 1973): 195–203, DOI: 10.1037/h0034701 (accessed 11 October 2021).
- 15J. Parker Ladwig and Thurston D. Miller, “Are First-circulation Patterns for Monographs in the Humanities Different from the Sciences?,” Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services 37, no. 3–4 (2013): 77–84, DOI: 10.1080/14649055.2013.10766352 (accessed 7 October 2021).
- 16Mary Summerfield, Carol Mandel, and Paul Kantor, “The Potential for Scholarly Online Books: Views from the Columbia University Online Books Evaluation Project,” Publishing Research Quarterly 16, no. 3, (2000): 39–52, DOI: 10.1007/s12109-000-0015-7 (accessed 7 October 2021).