Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Electronic resource management in a post-Plan S world Cover

Electronic resource management in a post-Plan S world

Insights
Volume 34 (2021): Issue 1
By: Jill Emery and  Graham Stone  
Open Access
|Sep 2021

References

  1. 1Oliver Pesch, “Library standards and e-resource management: a survey of current initiatives and standards efforts,” The Serials Librarian 55, no. 3 (2008): 481–486, DOI: 10.1080/03615260802059965 (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  2. 2Jill Emery and Graham Stone, “TERMS,” Library Technology Reports 49, no. 2 (2013): 6 DOI: 10.5860/ltr.49n2 (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  3. 3Jill Emery, Graham Stone, and Peter McCracken, Techniques for Electronic Resource Management: TERMS and the transition to open (Chicago: American Library Association, 2019), DOI: 10.15760/lib-01 (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  4. 4“Pareto principle,” Wikipedia, last modified March 12, 2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  5. 5Emery, Stone, and McCracken, Techniques for Electronic Resource Management, p. 10.
    Back to article
  6. 6“Plan S: making full and immediate Open Access a reality,” European Science Foundation, https://www.coalition-s.org/ (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  7. 7Rob Johnson, “From coalition to commons: Plan S and the future of scholarly communication,” Insights 32, no. 1 (2019): 5, DOI: 10.1629/uksg.453 (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  8. 8“Plan S: Principles and Implementation,” European Science Foundation, https://www.coalition-s.org/addendum-to-the-coalition-s-guidance-on-the-implementation-of-plan-s/principles-and-implementation/ (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  9. 9“Jisc, UK institutions and Wiley agree ground-breaking deal,” Jisc, last modified March 2, 2020, https://www.jisc.ac.uk/news/jisc-uk-institutions-and-wiley-agree-ground-breaking-deal-02-feb-2020 (accessed 6 August 2021); “Jisc and Springer Nature extend commitment to open access publishing,” Jisc, last modified January 20, 2021, https://www.jisc.ac.uk/news/jisc-and-springer-nature-extend-commitment-to-open-access-publishing-20-jan-2021 (accessed 6 August 2021); “New agreement with Elsevier: 100 percent Open Access,” Stockholm University Library, last modified November 19, 2019, https://www.kb.se/samverkan-och-utveckling/nytt-fran-kb/nyheter-samverkan-och-utveckling/2019-11-22-%E2%80%8Bnew-transformative-agreement-with-elsevier-enables-unlimited-open-access-to-swedish-research.html (accessed 6 August 2021); “Elsevier transformative open access agreement,” University of California Office of Scholarly Communication, https://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/uc-publisher-relationships/elsevier-oa-agreement/ (accessed 6 August 2021); “Wiley contract,” Projekt DEAL, last modified June 9, 2020, https://www.projekt-deal.de/wiley-contract/ (accessed 6 August 2021); “Springer Nature contract,” Projekt DEAL, last modified February18, 2020, https://www.projekt-deal.de/springer-nature-contract/ (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  10. 10Richard Van Noorden, “Nature journals announce first open-access agreement,” last modified October 20, 2020, https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02959-1?utm_source=twt_nnc&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=naturenews&sf239028791=1 (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  11. 11“ESAC workflow recommendations for transformative agreements,” Max Planck Digital Library, https://esac-initiative.org/about/oa-workflows/ (accessed 6 August 2021); “Our role in open access,” Jisc, https://www.jisc.ac.uk/content/open-access/our-role (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  12. 12Jeroen Bosman et al., “OA Diamond Journals Study. Part 1: Findings,” Zenodo, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4558704 (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  13. 13“Collections policy,” Imperial College London, https://www.imperial.ac.uk/admin-services/library/use-the-library/regulations-and-policies/collections-policy/ (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  14. 14“UvA open access policy and Diamond Open Access Fund,” University of Amsterdam, last modified February 4, 2021, https://uba.uva.nl/en/content/news/2021/02/uva-open-access-policy-and-diamond-open-access-fund.html?cb&cb&cb (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  15. 15Arianna Becerril et al., “OA Diamond Journals Study. Part 2: Recommendations,” Zenodo, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4562790 (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  16. 16David W. Lewis, “The 2.5% Commitment,” last modified September 11, 2017, DOI: 10.7912/C2JD29 (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  17. 17Cameron Neylon, “Against the 2.5% Commitment,” last modified January 5, 2018, https://cameronneylon.net/blog/against-the-2-5-commitment/ (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  18. 18Joanna Ball, Graham Stone, and Sarah Thompson, “Opening up the library: transforming our policies, practices and structures,” LIBER quarterly 31, no.1 (2021): 1–16, DOI: 10.18352/lq.10360 (accessed 18 August 2021).
    Back to article
  19. 19“ESAC workflow recommendations for transformative agreements,” Max Planck Digital Library; “Our role in open access,” Jisc.
    Back to article
  20. 20A. Scarlet, “Mapping the standards-driven license agreement,” last modified April 13, 2020, https://asgalvan.com/2020/04/13/draft-mapping-the-values-driven-license-agreement/ (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  21. 21“ESAC Transformative Agreement Registry,” Max Planck Digital Library, https://esac-initiative.org/about/transformative-agreements/agreement-registry/ (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  22. 22Jill Grogg et al., “How do we ensure ‘read’ institutions can still contribute to a ‘publish’-oriented OA ecosystem?” last modified June 15, 2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGO5V9_ZMgg&feature=youtu.be (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  23. 23Mafalda Marques and Graham Stone, “Transitioning to open access: an evaluation of the UK Springer Compact Agreement pilot 2016–2018,” College & Research Libraries 81, no. 6 (2020): 913, DOI: 10.5860/crl.81.6.913 (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  24. 24Beth R. Bernhardt et al., “A collaborative imperative? Libraries and the emerging scholarly communication future,” https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2019/plenarysessions/3/ (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  25. 25Andrea Chiarelli and Rob Johnson, “Perspectives on the open access discovery landscape,” Jisc scholarly communications (blog), April 24, 2019, https://scholarlycommunications.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2019/04/24/perspectives-on-the-open-access-discovery-landscape/ (accessed 6 August 2021); Teresa Auch Schultz et al., “Assessing the effectiveness of open access finding tools,” Information Technology and Libraries 38, no. 3 (2019): 82–90, DOI: 10.6017/ital.v38i3.11009 (accessed 6 August 2021); David Scherer et al., “Collaborative approaches to integrate repositories within the research information ecosystem: creating bridges for common goals,” The Serials Librarian 78, no. 1–4 (2020): 181–190, DOI: DOI: 10.1080/0361526X.2020.1728169 (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  26. 26Mafalda Marques, Saskia Woutersen-Windhouwer, and Arja Tuuliniemi, “Monitoring agreements with open access elements: why article-level metadata are important,” Insights 32, no. 1 (2020): 35, DOI: 10.1629/uksg.489 (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  27. 27Jan E. Frantsvåg and Tormod E. Strømme, “Few open access journals are compliant with Plan S,” Publications 7, no. 2 (2019): 26, DOI: 10.3390/publications7020026 (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  28. 28Josh Brown, “Developing a persistent identifier roadmap for open access to UK research,” (Bristol, Jisc, 2020), https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/7840/ (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  29. 29“Welcome to the Research Organization Registry Community,” ROR, https://ror.org/ (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  30. 30“Transfer,” NISO, http://www.niso.org/standards-committees/transfer (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  31. 31Karen Bjork, Stewart Brower, and Christopher Hollister, “A multi-institutional model for advancing open access journals and reclaiming the scholarly record”, Karen Bjork, Stewart Brower, and Christopher Hollister, last modified June 15, 2020, https://youtu.be/C9FmPm-vyB4 (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  32. 32Marques and Stone, ““Transitioning to open access”.
    Back to article
  33. 33Marques and Stone, ““Transitioning to open access”; Lisa Olsson et al., “The first Swedish Read & Publish agreement: an evaluation of the Springer Compact pilot,” LIBER quarterly 30, no. 1 (2020): 1–33, DOI: 10.18352/lq.10309
    Back to article
  34. 34Stuart Lawson, “Total Cost of Ownership of scholarly communication: managing subscription and APC payments together,” Learned Publishing 27 (2015): 13, DOI: 10.1087/20150103
    Back to article
  35. 35Marques and Stone, “Transitioning to open access”.
    Back to article
  36. 36Decrypting the big deal landscape follow-up of the 2019 EUA big deals survey report, European Universities Association, October 2019 https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/2019%20big%20deals%20report.pdf (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  37. 37Marques and Stone, “Transitioning to open access”.
    Back to article
  38. 38Liam Earney, “Offsetting and its discontents: challenges and opportunities of open access offsetting agreements,” Insights 30, no. 1 (2017): 11–24, DOI: 10.1629/uksg.345 (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  39. 39“Open APC,” Universität Bielefeld, https://www.intact-project.org/openapc/ (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  40. 40Mikael Laakso, Lisa Matthias, and Najko Jahn, “Open is not forever: A study of vanished open access journals,” Journal of the Association of Information Science and Technology (2021): 1–14, DOI: 10.1002/asi.24460 (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  41. 41“Internet Archive scholar,” Internet Archive, https://scholar.archive.org/ (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  42. 42“A better way to analyze your Big Deal,” Unsub, https://unsub.org/ (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  43. 43Michael Levine-Clark, Jason Price, and John McDonald, “Using the unbundling power of Unsub responsibly: unveiling its assumptions and unpacking its defaults,” 2020 Charleston Conference, https://2020charlestonconference.pathable.co/meetings/virtual/yPdFBbdqc3oLiNToG (accessed 6 August 2021)
    Back to article
  44. 44“ESAC market watch,” Max Planck Digital Library, https://esac-initiative.org/about/apcmarket (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  45. 45“SPARC Big Deal Cancellation Tracking,” SPARC, https://sparcopen.org/our-work/big-deal-cancellation-tracking/ (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  46. 46Lisa Olsson et al., “Swedish researchers’ responses to the cancellation of the big deal with Elsevier,” Insights 33, no. 1 (2020): 25, DOI: 10.1629/uksg.521 (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  47. 47“Plan S Rights Retention Strategy,” cOAlition S, https://www.coalition-s.org/rights-retention-strategy/ (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  48. 48Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe, “Explaining the rights retention strategy,” Scholarly kitchen (blog), February 17, 2021, https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2021/02/17/rights-retention-strategy/ (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  49. 49Open Access Books Springer Nature et al., “Diversifying readership through open access: a usage analysis for OA books,” figshare. Journal contribution, last modified September 10, 2020, DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12746177.v1 (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  50. 50“Geo-blocking,” Wikipedia, last modified January 8, 2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geo-blocking (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  51. 51Albert Remy, “Geolocation data tracking: what are the privacy risks?,” last modified February 4, 2020, https://www.tmcnet.com/topics/articles/2020/02/04/444375-geolocation-data-tracking-what-the-privacy-risks.htm (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  52. 52“Policy documents,” Altmetrics, last modified September 17, 2020, https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000129069-how-does-altmetric-track-policy-documents- (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  53. 53Angela Holzer et al., “Open Access to academic books: working towards the ‘tipping point’,” Knowledge Exchange News (blog), June 9 2020, https://www.knowledge-exchange.info/news/articles/09-06-20 (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  54. 54Anthony J. Olejniczak and Molly J. Wilson, “Who’s writing open access (OA) articles? Characteristics of OA authors at Ph.D.-granting institutions in the United States,” Quantitative science studies 1, no. 4 (2020): 1429–1450, DOI: 10.1162/qss_a_00091 (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
  55. 55“Budapest Open Access Initiative,” BOAI, https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/ (accessed 6 August 2021).
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.554 | Journal eISSN: 2048-7754
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 7, 2021
Accepted on: May 7, 2021
Published on: Sep 22, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year
Keywords:
Plan S,
open access,
electronic resource management

© 2021 Jill Emery, Graham Stone, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 34 (2021): Issue 1Next article