Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Open access book usage data – how close is COUNTER to the other kind? Cover

Open access book usage data – how close is COUNTER to the other kind?

By:   
Open Access
|Apr 2021

References

  1. “OAPEN Library”, OAPEN Foundation, 2010, https://www.oapen.org (accessed 15 February 2021).
  2. “International Collaboration and Value: Working with OAPEN”, IRUS-UK Case Studies, 2018, https://irus.jisc.ac.uk/documents/IRUS-UK_working_with_OAPEN.pdf (accessed 15 February 2021).
  3. Lucy Montgomery et al., “Getting the Best out of Data for Open Access Monograph Presses: A Case Study of UCL Press,” Learned Publishing 31, no. 4 (1 October 2018): 33544, DOI: 10.1002/leap.1168 (accessed 17 February 2021).
  4. Sofie Wennström et al., “The Significant Difference in Impact: An Exploratory Study about the Meaning and Value of Metrics for Open Access Monographs,” ELPUB 2019 23d International Conference on Electronic Publishing (June 2019), DOI: 10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2019.9 (accessed 15 February 2021).
  5. Ros Pyne et al., “The Future of Open Access Books: Findings from a Global Survey of Academic Book Authors,” Springer Nature Open Access Books, (June 2019), DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.8166599 (accessed 15 February 2021).
  6. Megan Taylor, “Mapping the Publishing Challenges for an Open Access University Press,” Publications 7, no. 4 (December 2019): 63, DOI: 10.3390/publications7040063 (accessed 17 February 2021).
  7. Ronald Snijder, “Measuring Monographs: A Quantitative Method to Assess Scientific Impact and Societal Relevance,” First Monday 18, no. 5 (May 2013), DOI: 10.5210/fm.v18i5.4250 (accessed 17 February 2021).
  8. Alkim Ozaygen, “Analysing the Usage Data of Open Access Scholarly Books: What Can Data Tell Us?,” (Thesis, Curtin University, 2019), https://espace.curtin.edu.au/handle/20.500.11937/79585 (accessed 17 February 2021).
  9. Lucy, Montgomery and Celeste Feather, “Knowledge Unlatched Pilot Collection to Become Open Access – Nearly 300 Libraries Globally Pledge Their Support,” Knowledge Unlatched (blog), 10 March 2014, https://knowledgeunlatched.org/2014/03/knowledge-unlatched-pilot-collection-to-become-open-access-nearly-300-libraries-globally-pledge-their-support/ (accessed 19 February 2021).
  10. “Developing a Pilot Data Trust for Open Access Ebook Usage,” Educopia Institute, https://educopia.org/data_trust/ (accessed 17 February 2021).
  11. Christina Drummond, “Engaging Stakeholder Networks to Support Global OA Monograph Usage Analytics,” Collaborative Librarianship 12, no. 2 (21 October 2020), https://digitalcommons.du.edu/collaborativelibrarianship/vol12/iss2/9 (accessed 15 February 2021); “Developing a Pilot Data Trust for Open Access Ebook Usage,” Educopia Institute, https://educopia.org/data_trust/ (accessed 15 February 2021).
  12. “COUNTER | About Us”, COUNTER, 2014, http://www.projectcounter.org/about.html (accessed 15 February 2021).
  13. Gayle Baker and Eleanor J. Read, “Vendor-Supplied Usage Data for Electronic Resources: A Survey of Academic Libraries,” Learned Publishing 21, no. 1 (1 January 2008): 4857, DOI: 10.1087/095315108X247276 (accessed 15 February 2021); Virginia Kinman, “E-Metrics and Library Assessment in Action,” Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship 21, no. 1 (16 April 2009): 15–36, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19411260902858318 (accessed 15 February 2021).
  14. Tabatha Farney and Nina McHale, “Introducing Google Analytics for Libraries,” Library Technology Reports 49, no. 4 (2013): 58, https://www.journals.ala.org/index.php/ltr/article/view/4269 (accessed 15 February 2021); Steven J. Turner, “Website Statistics 2.0: Using Google Analytics to Measure Library Website Effectiveness,” Technical Services Quarterly 27, no. 3 (May 2010): 261–78, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131003765910 (accessed 15 February 2021).
  15. “7.0 Processing Rules for Underlying COUNTER Reporting Data,” COUNTER, https://www.projectcounter.org/code-of-practice-five-sections/7-processing-rules-underlying-counter-reporting-data/ (accessed 15 February 2021).
  16. ‘About Events – Analytics Help’, Google, 2020, https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/1033068?hl=en#Anatomy (accessed 15 February 2021).
  17. “Release 5: Understanding Investigations and Requests,” COUNTER, 26 May 2017, https://www.projectcounter.org/release-5-understanding-investigations-and-requests/ (accessed 15 February 2021).
  18. Bridget Byrne et al., Ethnicity, Race and Inequality in the UK: State of the Nation (Bristol: Policy Press, 2020), https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/22310 (accessed 15 February 2021).
  19. Ed, Finn, David Guston, and Jason Scott Robert, Frankenstein : A New Edition for Scientists and Engineers (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2017), https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31387 (accessed 15 February 2021).
  20. Heike Paul, The Myths That Made America : An Introduction to American Studies (transcript Verlag, 2014), https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31456 (accessed 15 February 2021).
  21. Wael Al-Delaimy, Veerabhadran Ramanathan, and Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo, Health of People, Health of Planet and Our Responsibility: Climate Change, Air Pollution and Health (Cham: Springer Nature, 2020), https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/37742, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-31125-4 (accessed 15 February 2021).
  22. Haymo Mitschian, m-Learning – die neue Welle? Mobiles Lernen für Deutsch als Fremdsprache (Kassel: Kassel University Press, 2010), DOI: 10.26530/OAPEN_355293 (accessed 15 February 2021).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.539 | Journal eISSN: 2048-7754
Language: English
Page range: 9 - 9
Submitted on: Nov 11, 2020
Accepted on: Dec 9, 2020
Published on: Apr 28, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2021 Ronald Snijder, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.