References
- 1Knowledge Exchange and Cameron Neylon, “Knowledge Exchange approach towards Open Scholarship,” 10.5281/zenodo.826643 (accessed 15 December 2020).
- 2
“Copyright Law of the People’s Republic of China,” World Intellectual Property Organization,https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/cn/cn031en.pdf (accessed 15 December 2020). - 3“San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment,” DORA,
https://sfdora.org/read/ (accessed 15 December 2020). - 4Nick Shockey, “SPARC’s Efforts to Help ‘Design Equitable Foundations for Open Knowledge’,” International Open Access Week (blog), October 22, 2018,
http://www.openaccessweek.org/profiles/blogs/sparc-s-efforts-to-help-design-equitable-foundations-for-open-kno (accessed 15 December 2020). - 5
“About the University,” University of Nottingham Ningbo China,https://www.nottingham.edu.cn/en/About/Who-we-are.aspx (accessed 15 December 2020). - 6
“Nottingham ePrints,” University of Nottingham,http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/ (accessed 15 December 2020). - 7
“Repository@Nottingham,” University of Nottingham,https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/ (accessed 15 December 2020). - 8
“Code of Research Conduct and Research Ethics,” University of Nottingham,https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/research/documents/ethics-and-integrity/code-of-research-conduct-and-research-ethics-version-6a-revisions-mar-2019.pdf (accessed 15 December 2020). - 9
“Code of Research Conduct and Research Ethics,” University of Nottingham Ningbo China, last modified June 17, 2020,https://www.nottingham.edu.cn/en/research-and-business/documents/ethics/code-of-research-conduct-and-research-ethics.pdf (accessed 15 December 2020). - 10
“Copyright Database Rights and Associated Issues,” University of Nottingham,https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/hr/guidesandsupport/universitycodesofpracticeandrules/documents/copyright,databaserightsandassociatedissues.pdf (accessed 15 December 2020). - 11“UK Scholarly Communications Licence and Model Policy,” UKSCL,
https://ukscl.ac.uk/ (accessed 15 December 2020). - 12Chris Banks, “Focusing upstream: supporting scholarly communication by academics,” Insights 29, no. 1 (2016): 37–44, DOI: 10.1629/uksg.292 (accessed 15 December 2020).
- 13Torsten Reimer, “The UK Scholarly Communications Licence – supporting academics with open access,” ALISS Quarterly 12, no. 2 (2017): 3–5, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.375830 (accessed 15 December 2020).
- 14Chris Banks, “Making full and immediate open access a reality: the role of the institutional OA policy,” UKSCL,
https://ukscl.ac.uk/making-full-and-immediate-open-access-a-reality-the-role-of-the-institutional-oa-policy/ (accessed 15 December 2020). - 15Richard Van Noorden, “Chinese agencies announce open-access policies: researchers will now be required to make papers free to read within one year of publication,” Nature, (2014): 1–3, DOI: 10.1038/nature.2014.15255 (accessed 15 December 2020).
- 16Chinese Academy of Sciences, “Chinese Academy of Sciences Policy Statement on Open Access to Articles from Publicly Funded Scientific Research Projects,” Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences 28, no. 3 (2014): 230,
http://english.cas.cn/bcas/2014_3/201411/P020141121529341476017.pdf - 17
“NSFC Policy Statement on Open Access(OA) to the research publications of Its Funded Projects,” National Natural Science Foundation of China,http://or.nsfc.gov.cn/statement (accessed 15 December 2020). - 18
“Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid,” Chinese Academy of Sciences,http://www.irgrid.ac.cn/ (accessed 15 December 2020). - 19
“China Open Access Journals,” Chinese Academy of Sciences, accessed June 3, 2018,http://www.coaj.cn/ (accessed 15 December 2020). - 20Jingfeng Xia, “Scholarly Communication in East and Southeast Asia: traditions and challenges,” IFLA Journal 32, no. 2 (2006): 104–112, DOI: 10.1177/0340035206066407 (accessed 15 December 2020).
- 21Xiaolin Zhang, “Development of open access in China: Strategies, practices, challenges,” Insights 27, no. 1 (2014): 45–50, DOI: 10.1629/2048-7754.111 (accessed 15 December 2020).
- 22“UKRI Open Access Principles and High Level Policy,” UK Research and Innovation, accessed October 3, 2019,
https://www.ukri.org/files/legacy/oadocs/ukri-open-access-principles-and-high-level-policy-pdf/ . - 23“Guidance on Submissions (2019/01),” REF2021,
https://www.ref.ac.uk/publications/guidance-on-submissions-201901/ (accessed 15 December 2020). - 24“UKRI Open Access Review Consultation,” UK Research and Innovation, last modified March 25, 2020,
https://www.ukri.org/files/funding/oa/open-access-review-consultation/ (accessed 15 December 2020). - 25
“What is cOAlition S?” European Science Foundation,https://www.coalition-s.org/about/ (accessed 15 December 2020). - 26
“Work Plan and Priority Actions for cOAlition S,” European Science Foundation,https://www.coalition-s.org/workplan-and-priority-actions-for-coalition-s/ (accessed 15 December 2020). - 27Quirin Schiermeier, “China backs bold plan to tear down journal paywalls,” Nature 564, no. 7735 (2018): 171–173,
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07659-5 . DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-07659-5 (accessed 15 December 2020). - 28“NSL/CAS Position on Further Promotion of Open Access for Research Papers from Publicly Funded Research Projects,” Nature,
https://www.nature.com/magazine-assets/d41586-018-07659-5/16319536 (accessed 15 December 2020). - 29“Position of the Natural Science Foundation of China on Further Promotion of Open Access for Research Papers from Publicly Funded Research Projects,” Nature,
https://www.nature.com/magazine-assets/d41586-018-07659-5/16319534 (accessed 15 December 2020). - 30“National Science and Technology Library, Ministry of Science and Technology Position on Further Promotion of Open Access for Research Papers from Publicly Funded Research Projects,” Nature,
https://www.nature.com/magazine-assets/d41586-018-07659-5/16319532 (accessed 15 December 2020). - 31Brian Lavoie and Constance Malpas, Stewardship of the Evolving Scholarly Record: From the Invisible Hand to Conscious Coordination (Dublin, OH: OCLC Online Computer Library Center Inc., 2015),
http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/2015/oclcresearch-esr-stewardship-2015.pdf (accessed 17 December 2020). - 32James Wilsdon et al., The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management, July 2015,
https://re.ukri.org/documents/hefce-documents/metric-tide-2015-pdf/ . DOI: 10.4135/9781473978782 (accessed 17 December 2020). - 33Jerry Z. Muller, The tyranny of metrics (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2018).
- 34Diana Hicks et al., “Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics,” Nature 520, no. 7548 (2015): 429–431, DOI: 10.1038/520429a (accessed 17 December 2020).
- 35David Moher et al., “The Hong Kong Manifesto for Assessing Researchers: Fostering Research Integrity 2,” OSF Preprints, (2019): 2–5, DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/m9abx (accessed 31st December 2020).
- 36
“The Plan S Principles,” European Science Foundation,https://www.coalition-s.org/plan_s_principles/ (accessed 17 December 2020). - 37Jeremy J. Baumberg,
“Publish or Perish,” In The secret life of science: how it really works and why it matters, ed. J. J. Baumberg (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2018). DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvc77f1w - 38
“The Global University Publications Licence (2.0),” University of Nottingham Ningbo China,https://www.nottingham.edu.cn/en/library/documents/research/global-university-publications-licence-2.0.pdf (accessed 17 December 2020). - 39Peter Suber, “Open access overview: Focussing on open access to peer-reviewed research articles and their preprints,” last modified November 15, 2010,
https://opensource.com/education/10/10/open-access-overview-focusing-open-access-peer-reviewed-research-articles-and-their- (accessed 17 December 2020). - 40Robert Johnson,
“Making Open Access Work for Authors, Institutions and Publishers,” Copyright Clearance Center, last modified January, 2015,http://www.copyright.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Report-Making-Open-Access-Work.pdf (accessed 17 December). - 41Nadine Levin et al., “How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice,” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 36, no. 2 (2016): 128–141, DOI: 10.1177/0270467616668760 (accessed 17 December 2020).
- 42George Monbiot, “Scientific publishing is a rip-off. We fund the research. It should be free,” The Guardian, September 13, 2018,
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/13/scientific-publishing-rip-off-taxpayers-fund-research (accessed 17 December 2020). - 43Joe Karaganis,
“Introduction: Access from Above, Access from Below,” In Shadow Libraries: Access to Knowledge in Global Higher Education, ed. J. Karaganis (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2018), 1–24. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/11339.001.0001 - 44Julie Baldwin and Stephen Pinfield, “The UK Scholarly Communication Licence: Attempting to Cut through the Gordian Knot of the Complexities of Funder Mandates, Publisher Embargoes and Researcher Caution in Achieving Open Access,” Publications 6, no. 3 (2018): 31, DOI: 10.3390/publications6030031 (accessed 17 December 2020).
- 45Karin Wulf and Simon Newman, “Missing the Target: The UK Scholarly Communications License,” last modified July 26, 2017,
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/07/26/missing-target-uk-scholarly-communications-license/ (accessed 17 December 2020). - 46Rick Anderson, “CC BY and Its Discontents: An OA Challenge,” Library Journal 150, no. 5 (2015): 16.
- 47Karin Wulf, “Historians Respond to Plan S: Open Access vs OA Policies Redux,” The Scholarly Kitchen, last modified November 21, 2019,
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2019/11/21/historians-respond-to-plan-s-open-access-vs-oa-policies-redux (accessed 17 December 2020). - 48Valérie Spezi et al., “Researchers’ green open access practice: a cross-disciplinary analysis,” Journal of Documentation 69, no. 3 (2013): 334–359, DOI: 10.1108/JD-01-2012-0008 (accessed 17 December 2020).
- 49Roger C. Schonfeld, “Open Access Publishing: New Evidence on Faculty Attitudes and Behaviors,” The Scholarly Kitchen, last modified April 15, 2019,
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2019/04/15/open-access-publishing-new-evidence (accessed 17 December 2020). - 50Elsie Zhou et al., “Open Access Books: an international collaboration to explore the practical implications for librarians of increasing access to scholarly research outputs,” IFLA WLIC 2018, (2018): 24–30,
http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53332/2/163-zhou-en.pdf (accessed 17 December 2020). - 51Robin Peek, “Harvard Faculty Mandates OA,” Information Today 25, no. 4 (2008): 15
https://www.questia.com/read/1G1-177673457/harvard-faculty-mandates-oa . - 52
“Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education,” Association of College and Research Libraries,http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/infolit/framework1.pdf (accessed 17 December 2020). - 53
“Publication Checklist,” University of Nottingham Ningbo China,https://www.nottingham.edu.cn/en/library/documents/research/publication-checklist.pdf (accessed 17 December 2020). - 54Stuart Shieber,
“A Model Open-Access Policy,” Harvard University, last modified December 18, 2015,https://osc.hul.harvard.edu/assets/files/model-policy-annotated_12_2015.pdf (accessed 17 December 2020). - 55Peter Suber and Stuart Shieber,
“Good practices for university Open-Access policies,” Harvard University, last modified October, 2015,http://cyber.harvard.edu/hoap/sites/hoap/images/Goodpracticesguide-2015.pdf (accessed 17 December 2020). - 56Jane Johnson Otto and Laura Bowering Mullen, “The Rutgers open access policy goes into effect,” Library Management 40, no. 1/2 (2019): 59–73, DOI: 10.1108/LM-10-2017-0105 (accessed 17 December 2020).
- 57
“arXiv License Information,” Cornell Univerisity,https://arxiv.org/help/license (accessed 17 December 2020). - 58Elizabeth Gadd, “The university, its open access policy, the academics and their freedom,” last modified November 24, 2017,
https://copyrightliteracy.org/2017/11/24/the-university-its-open-access-policy-the-academics-and-their-freedom/ (accessed 17 December 2020). - 59“Publisher copyright policies & self-archiving,” Sherpa RoMEO,
http://sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/index.php (accessed 17 December 2020). - 60Chris Morrison et al., “Open Access: An Analysis of Publisher Copyright and Licensing Policies in Europe, 2020,”
https://zenodo.org/record/4046624 (accessed 17 December 2020). - 61Hamid R. Jamali, “Copyright compliance and infringement in ResearchGate full-text journal articles,” Scientometrics 112, no. 1 (2017): 241–254, DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2291-4 (accessed 17 December 2020).
- 62Zhou et al., “Open Access Books,” 7.
- 63Faye A. Chadwell and Shan C. Sutton, “The future of open access and library publishing,” New Library World 115, no. 5/6 (2014): 225–236, DOI: 10.1108/NLW-05-2014-0049 (accessed 17 December 2020).
- 64National Information Standards Organization, “NISO RP-8-2008, Journal Article Versions (JAV): Recommendations of the NISO/ALPSP JAV Technical Working Group,”
https://www.niso.org/publications/niso-rp-8-2008-jav (accessed 17 December 2020). - 65Emma L. Tonkin, Stephanie Taylor, and Gregory J. L. Tourte, “Cover sheets considered harmful,” Information services & use 33, no. 2 (2013): 129–137, DOI: 10.3233/ISU-130705 (accessed 17 December 2020).
- 66“Inclusion Guidelines for Webmasters,” Google Scholar,
https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/inclusion.html (accessed 17 December 2020). - 67George Macgregor, “Improving the discoverability and web impact of open repositories: techniques and evaluation,” Code4Lib Journal 43, (2019),
https://journal.code4lib.org/articles/14180 (accessed 17 December 2020). - 68“REF 2021: Overview of open access policy and guidance,” Research Excellence Framework,
https://www.ref.ac.uk/media/1228/open_access_summary__v1_0.pdf (accessed 17 December 2020). - 69Martin Klein et al., “Comparing published scientific journal articles to their pre-print versions,” International Journal on Digital Libraries 20, no. 4 (2019): 335–350, DOI: 10.1007/s00799-018-0234-1 (accessed 17 December 2020).
- 70Molly Strothmann, “No Bad Publicity: The Bibliometric Advantage of Corrected Articles in PLOS ONE,” Science & Technology Libraries 37, no. 4 (2018): 394–408, DOI: 10.1080/0194262X.2018.1503990 (accessed 17 December 2020).
- 71Peter Jandrić and Sarah Hayes, “The postdigital challenge of redefining academic publishing from the margins,” Learning, Media and Technology 44, no. 3 (2019): 381–393, DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2019.1585874 (accessed 17 December 2020).
- 72Michael Adrian Peters and Petar Jandrić, The Digital University: A Dialogue and Manifesto. (New York: Peter Lang, 2018), DOI: 10.3726/b11314 (accessed 17 December 2020).
- 73Elizabeth Gadd, Charles Oppenheim, and Steve Probets, “RoMEO studies 1: the impact of copyright ownership on academic author self-archiving,” Journal of Documentation 59, no. 3 (2003): 243, DOI: 10.1108/00220410310698239 (accessed 17 December 2020).
- 74Elizabeth Gadd, “UK university policy approaches towards the copyright ownership of scholarly works and the future of open access,” Aslib Journal of Information Management 69, no. 1 (2017): 95–114, DOI: 10.1108/AJIM-06-2016-0092 (accessed 17 December 2020).
- 75Donna L. Ferullo,
“Copyright Services for Librarians,” in Managing copyright in higher education: a guidebook (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017), 86–87. - 76Jonathan P. Tennant et al., “Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing,” Publications 7, no. 2 (2019): DOI: 10.3390/publications7020034 (accessed 17 December 2020).
- 77Aileen Fyfe et al., Untangling Academic Publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research, May 2017,
https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/19148/1/UntanglingAcPub.pdf (accessed 17 December 2020). - 78Yong Gao, Qiang Wu, and Linna Zhu, “Merging the citations received by arXiv-deposited e-prints and their corresponding published journal articles: Problems and perspectives,” Information Processing and Management 57, no. 5 (2020): DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102267 (accessed 17 December 2020).