Enhancing social capital in our stakeholder networks

Mary Dunne

doi:10.1629/uksg.530

Abstract

Our value as information professionals is often associated with the physical capital we provide, such as library space and collection. Yet our value also comes from the skills, knowledge and professional connections we share with others. Social capital refers to the resources received from knowing others. Those working in scholarly communication are in position to increase the social capital of our stakeholders by being visible, active members of their networks.

Different types of social capital provide different benefits and resources that enable action. Having ‘bridging’ social capital means you are loosely connected to a number of diverse people who can provide quick access to useful resources. Having ‘bonding’ social capital means you are deeply involved with one or more collectives that can enable change through shared customs, norms, vision and trust. By understanding the nature of the (virtual or in-person) relationships within our professional communities, we can identify varied needs and relevant mechanisms of change and support. By speaking in terms of enhancing forms of capital for stakeholders, we can more effectively communicate our purpose and value as key brokers in knowledge mobilization networks.

References

1Janet C Long, Frances C Cunningham, and Jeffrey Braithwaite, “Bridges, Brokers and Boundary Spanners in Collaborative Networks: A Systematic Review,” BMC Health Services Research 13, no. 1 (April 2013): 158, DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-158 (accessed 9 October 2020); Reza Yousefi-Nooraie et al., “The Evolution of Social Networks through the Implementation of Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Interventions: A Longitudinal Analysis of Three Public Health Units in Canada,” Implementation Science 10, (December 2015): 166, DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0355-5 (accessed 9 October 2020); Isiome N. Elueze, “Evaluating the Effectiveness of Knowledge Brokering in Health Research: A Systematised Review With Some Bibliometric Information,” Health Information & Libraries Journal 32, no. 3 (2015): 168–181, DOI: 10.1111/hir.12097 (accessed 9 October 2020).
Back to article
2Anne Hofmeyer and Patricia B. Marck, “Building Social Capital in Healthcare Organizations: Thinking Ecologically for Safer Care,” Nursing Outlook 56, no. 4 (July 2008): 145.e1–145.e9, p.147, DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.01.001 (accessed 9 October 2020).
Back to article
3Ronald S. Burt, “Structural Holes and Good Ideas,” American Journal of Sociology 110, no. 2 (September 2004): 349–99, DOI: 10.1086/421787 (accessed 9 October 2020).
Back to article
4Hofmeyer and Marck, “Building Social Capital in Healthcare Organizations”; Gretchen Ennis and Deborah West, “Exploring the Potential of Social Network: Analysis in Asset-Based Community Development Practice and Research,” Australian Social Work 63, no.4 (December 2010): 404–417, DOI: 10.1080/0312407X.2010.508167; Alison Kitson et al., “Using Complexity and Network Concepts to Inform Healthcare Knowledge Translation,” International Journal of Health Policy and Management 7, no. 3 (July 10, 2017): 231–43, DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.79 (accessed 9 October 2020).
Back to article
5Burt, “Structural Holes and Good Ideas.”
Back to article
6Zachary Neal, “Making Big Communities Small: Using Network Science to Understand the Ecological and Behavioral Requirements for Community Social Capital,” American Journal of Community Psychology 55, no. 3–4 (June 2015): 369–80, DOI: 10.1007/s10464-015-9720-4 (accessed 12 October 2020).
Back to article
7Janine Nahapiet and Sumantra Ghoshal, “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage,” The Academy of Management Review 23, no. 2 (April 1998): 242, DOI: 10.2307/259373 (accessed 12 October 2020); Jenna M. Evans, Adalsteinn Brown, and G. Ross Baker, “Organizational Knowledge and Capabilities in Healthcare: Deconstructing and Integrating Diverse Perspectives,” SAGE Open Medicine 5 (June 2017): 1–10, DOI: 10.1177/2050312117712655 (accessed 12 October 2020).
Back to article
8Gill Green and Melanie Rein, “Building Research Capital to Facilitate Research,” Health Research Policy and Systems 11, no. 1 (December 2013): 12, DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-12 (accessed 12 October 2020); S. Moore and I. Kawachi, “Twenty Years of Social Capital and Health Research: A Glossary,” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 71, no. 5 (May 2017): 513–17, DOI: 10.1136/jech-2016-208313 (accessed 12 October 2020); Julie Hermans and Thomas Lederer, “The Paradox of Social Capital: A Look Through the Individual Rationality,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning, 2009, 139–47, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/411e/aeceb8d23607bacb3063c79aa3ff44342f3f.pdf (accessed 12 October 2020).
Back to article
9Ennis and West, “Exploring the Potential of Social Network Analysis in Asset-Based Community Development Practice and Research.”
Back to article
10Hermans and Lederer, “The Paradox of Social Capital: A Look Through the Individual Rationality.”
Back to article
11Nahapiet and Ghoshal, “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage.”
Back to article
12Nahapiet and Ghoshal, “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage.”
Back to article
13Burt, “Structural Holes and Good Ideas”; Neal, “Making Big Communities Small.”
Back to article
14Jennifer Watling Neal and Zachary P. Neal, “Implementation Capital: Merging Frameworks of Implementation Outcomes and Social Capital to Support the Use of Evidence-Based Practices,” Implementation Science 14, (February 2019): 16, DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0860-z (accessed 12 October 2020).
Back to article
15S. Szreter, “Health by Association? Social Capital, Social Theory, and the Political Economy of Public Health,” International Journal of Epidemiology 33, no. 4 (July 28, 2004): 650–67, DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyh013 (accessed 12 October 2020).
Back to article
16Hofmeyer and Marck, “Building Social Capital in Healthcare Organizations.”
Back to article
17Neal and Neal, “Implementation Capital.”
Back to article
18Moore and Kawachi, “Twenty Years of Social Capital and Health Research.”
Back to article
19Neal, “Making Big Communities Small.”
Back to article
20Neal and Neal, “Implementation Capital.”
Back to article
21Mark W. McElroy, René J. Jorna, and Jo van Engelen, “Rethinking Social Capital Theory: A Knowledge Management Perspective,” ed. Francisco Jaview Carrillo, Journal of Knowledge Management 10, no. 5 (September 2006): 124–36, DOI: 10.1108/13673270610691233 (accessed 12 October).
Back to article
22Jeanetta Drueke, “Researching Local Organizations: Simple Strategies for Building Social Capital,” Reference & User Services Quarterly 45, no. 4 (2006): 327–33, https://www.jstor.org/stable/20864563; Stuart Ferguson, “Are Public Libraries Developers of Social Capital? A Review of Their Contribution and Attempts to Demonstrate It,” The Australian Library Journal 61, no. 1 (February 2012): 22–33, DOI: 10.1080/00049670.2012.10722299 (accessed 12 October 2020); Yuko Yoshida, “Creating a Space for Autonomous Learning and Citizen Involvement in Collaboration with a Public Library,” New Library World 117, no. 9/10 (October 10, 2016): 659–72, DOI: 10.1108/NLW-04-2016-0023 (accessed 12 October); Andreas Vårheim, Sven Steinmo, and Eisaku Ide, “Do Libraries Matter? Public Libraries and the Creation of Social Capital,” Journal of Documentation 64, no. 6 (October 17, 2008): 877–92, DOI: 10.1108/00220410810912433 (accessed 12 October 2020).
Back to article
23JM Lilly, “Social Capital Experiences of Solo Middle School Librarians at a Public School District in South Texas: A Phenomenological Study” (Texas, The Faculty of the Department of Educational Leadership Sam Houston State University, 2016), http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11875/37 (accessed 12 October); Jorge Tiago Martins, Rosa Canhoto, “Leveraging new knowledge with relational capabilities: An investigation of rural school libraries in southern Portugal,” Library Review 65, no. 6/7 (2016): 386–403, DOI: 10.1108/LR-10-2015-0099 (accessed 12 October 2020); Anne Goulding, “Libraries and Social Capital,” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 36, no. 1 (March, 2004): 3–6, DOI: 10.1177/0961000604042965 (accessed 12 October 2020).
Back to article
24Timothy M. Schlak, “Social Capital and Leadership in Academic Libraries: The Broader Exchange around ‘Buy In’,” Library Management 36, no. 6/7 (August 10, 2015): 394–407, DOI: 10.1108/LM-11-2014-0133 (accessed 12 October 2020).
Back to article
25Lilly, “Social Capital Experiences of Solo Middle School Librarians at a Public School District in South Texas: A Phenomenological Study.”
Back to article
26Schlak, “Social Capital and Leadership in Academic Libraries: The Broader Exchange around ‘Buy In’,” p.399.
Back to article
27Mary Dunne et al., “Library value and impact: taking the step from knowing it to showing it,” Library and Information Research 37, no. 116 (December 2013), DOI: 10.29173/lirg577 (accessed 15 October 2020).
Back to article
28Laurenz Langer et al., The Science of Using Science: Researching the Use of Research Evidence in Decision-Making (London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, 2016), https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=3504; Susan Michie, Maartje M. van Stralen, and Robert West, “The Behaviour Change Wheel: A New Method for Characterising and Designing Behaviour Change Interventions,” Implementation Science 6, (April 2011): 42, DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 (accessed 12 October 2020).
Back to article
29Nahapiet and Ghoshal, “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage.”
Back to article
30Langer et al., The Science of Using Science.
Back to article
31Matthias Hofer and Viviane Aubert, “Perceived Bridging and Bonding Social Capital on Twitter: Differentiating between Followers and Followees,” Computers in Human Behavior 29, no. 6 (November 2013): 2134–42, DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.038 (accessed 12 October 2020).
Back to article
32Langer et al., The Science of Using Science; Elizabeth West et al., “Hierarchies and Cliques in the Social Networks of Health Care Professionals: Implications for the Design of Dissemination Strategies,” Social Science & Medicine 48, no. 5 (March 1999): 633–46, DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00361-X (accessed 12 October 2020); Carole A. Estabrooks et al., “A Guide to Knowledge Translation Theory,” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 26, no. 1 (2006): 25–36, DOI: 10.1002/chp.48 (accessed 12 October 2020).
Back to article
33Petros Kostagiolas, Managing Intellectual Capital in Libraries: Beyond the Balance Sheet (Oxford: Chandos Publ, 2012).
Back to article
34Tristan Claridge, “How to Measure Social Capital - Social Capital Research & Training,” August 20, 2017, https://www.socialcapitalresearch.com/measure-social-capital/ (accessed 12 October 2020).
Back to article
35Julika Loss et al., “Social Capital in a Regional Inter-Hospital Network among Trauma Centers (Trauma Network): Results of a Qualitative Study in Germany,” BMC Health Services Research 18, (February 2018): 137, DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-2918-z (accessed 12 October 2020).
Back to article
36Martin Van Der Gaag and Tom A.B. Snijders, “The Resource Generator: Social Capital Quantification with Concrete Items,” Social Networks 27, no. 1 (January 2005): 1–29, DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.10.001 (accessed 12 October 2020).
Back to article

Enhancing social capital in our stakeholder networks

Abstract

Paradigm

My account