Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Community feedback on scholarly content: why it is important and why it should be preserved Cover

Community feedback on scholarly content: why it is important and why it should be preserved

Open Access
|May 2018

Abstract

The provision of community feedback on the exploration of science is as old as the quest itself. As the publication process has evolved and collaboration technology has adapted along with it, feedback has moved from letters to listservs to preprints to online commenting and annotation. The February 2017 approval of open standards for web annotation provides the infrastructure for an interoperable collaborative annotation layer that will make conversations over scientific content ubiquitous and standard. How is annotation different from current commenting tools? What happens when websites discontinue support for comments, as happened in February 2018 when the National Center for Biotechnology Information announced the end of PubMed Commons? Learn how this community feedback was preserved in the form of annotations that support the FAIR data principles that they be findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.418 | Journal eISSN: 2048-7754
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 22, 2018
Accepted on: Mar 28, 2018
Published on: May 1, 2018
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2018 Heather Staines, Maryann E. Martone, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.