Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Reference rot in scholarly statement: threat and remedy Cover

Reference rot in scholarly statement: threat and remedy

Open Access
|Jul 2015

Figures & Tables

Table 1

This table shows the effect of reference rot in a corpus of 6,400 e-theses defended between 2003 and 2010 in five US institutions: Florida State University, University of Notre Dame, Penn State University, Virginia Tech and Worcester Polytechnic Institute. There were 45,982 URIs extracted and tested for link rot and archive status. This shows that 29.3% of URIs are considered safe in term of long-term access, with content available on the live web and in web archives. Of the remainder, 34% of URIs are at risk: although they are live on the web, they are not archived; 18.3% of URIs are preserved but no longer available on the live web; and, finally, 18.4% of URIs are lost for good because they are not on the live web or the web archives.

On live webNot on live webTotal
Archived29.3% (Safe)18.3% (Preserved)47.6%
Not archived34% (At risk)18.4% (Lost)52.4%
Total63.3%36.7%100%
figures/Fig01_web.png
Figure 1

Example of the robust link syntax for an article21 published by The New Yorker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.237 | Journal eISSN: 2048-7754
Language: English
Published on: Jul 7, 2015
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2015 Peter Burnhill, Muriel Mewissen, Richard Wincewicz, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.