References
- 1.
RDA Toolkit, introduction: http://access.rdatoolkit.org (accessed 24 April 2013 ). - 2.
IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. Functional requirements for bibliographic records: final report (UBCIM publications; new series , vol. 19), 1998, München K G Saur: http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr.pdf (accessed24 April 2013 ). - 3.
IFLA Working Group on Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR). Functional Requirements for Authority Data: a conceptual model: Final Report, December 2008, 2009, München K G Saur - 4.
Riva P Oliver C, Evaluation of RDA as an Implementation of FRBR and FRAD, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 2012, 50 (5–7), 564–586. - 5.
IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, 82, ref. 2. - 6.
IFLA Working Group on Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR), 83, ref. 3. - 7.
RDA Toolkit, ref. 1. - 8.
Report and Recommendations of the US RDA Test Coordinating Committee, 9 May 2011, revised for public release 20 June 2011: http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/source/rdatesting-finalreport-20june2011.pdf (accessed 24 April 2013 ). - 9.
Response of the Library of Congress, the National Agricultural Library, and the National Library of Medicine to the RDA Test Coordinating Committee, June 13, 2011: http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/source/rda-execstatement-13june11.pdf (accessed 24 April 2013 ). - 10.
SBD: International Standard Bibliographic Description, (Consolidated ed), ( IFLA Series on Bibliographic Control; Nr 44 ), 2011, Berlin/Munich, De Gruyter Saur. - 11.
RDA Toolkit, Appendix D, ref.1. - 12.
Rogers E, Diffusion of Innovations, (5th ed), New York, Free Press, 2003, 12. - 13.
RDA-L archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/rda-l@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca/ (accessed 24 April 2013 ). - 14.
Rogers E, 14, ref. 12. - 15.
Rogers E, 5, ref. 12. - 16.
Moulaison H L, A New Cataloging Curriculum in a Time of Innovation: Exploring a Modular Approach to Online Delivery, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 2012, 50 (2–3), 95. - 17.
Tosaka Y, RDA: Resource Description & Access: A Survey of the Current State of the Art, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64(4), 651–662. - 18.
Tillett B, Resource Description and Access: Background / Overview, 2008: http://www.loc.gov/today/cyberlc/feature_wdesc.php?rec=4320 (accessed 24 April 2013 ). - 19.
Hunt S, RDA in your ILS, Catalogue and Index, 2012, 169, 22–24. - 20.
El-Sherbini M, RDA: Strategies for implementation, 2013, Chicago, ALA Editions. - 21.
Rogers E, 265–266, ref. 12. - 22.
Rogers E, 267, ref. 12. - 23.
Rogers E, 282–285, ref. 12. - 24.
Rogers E, 267 & 281, ref. 12.
