References
- 1.
Wager E Fiack S Graf C Robinson A Rowlands I Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey, Journal of Medical Ethics, 2009, 35, 348–53. - 2.
Fanelli D, How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data, PLoS One, 2009, 4(5), e5738. - 3.
Committee on Publication Ethics. Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors: http://publicationethics.org/files/Code of conduct for journal editors_0.pdf (accessed 19 July 2012 ). - 4.
WAME Policy Statement: The relationship between journal editors-in-chief and owners: http://www wame.org/resources/policies#dependence (accessed: 8 June 2011 ). - 5.
Smith R, Editor's Choice, BMJ, 2004, doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7457.0-g. - 6.
Smith R, ref. 5. - 7.
Wager E, COPE objectives and achievements 1997–2012, La Presse Medicale (in press). - 8.
Anon Statement of disputed authorship, British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2006, 113, i. - 9.
Smith R, Another editor bites the dust, BMJ, 1999, 319, 272. - 10.
Smith R, The firing of Brother George, BMJ, 1999, 318, 210. - 11.
Spurgeon D, CMA draws criticism for sacking editors, BMJ, 2006, 332:503. - 12.
Fletcher S W Fletcher R H Medical editors, journal owners, and the sacking of George Lundberg, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1999, 14, 200–202. - 13.
Monbiot G, Academic publishers make Murdoch look like a socialist, The Guardian, 29 August 2011: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/29/academic-publishers-murdoch-socialist (accessed 19 July 2012 ). - 14.
Wager E, Coping with scientific misconduct, BMJ, 2011, 343, d6586. - 15.
Callaway E, Report finds massive fraud at Dutch universities, Nature, 2011, 479, 15. - 16.
Marcus A, Japanese anesthesiologist fabricated data in 172 studies, Anesthesiology News, 2 July 2012: http://www.anesthesiologynews.com//ViewArticle.aspx?ses=ogst&d=Web+Exclusives&d_id=175&i=ISSUE%3a+June+2012&i_id=854&a_id=21194 (accessed 19 July 2012 ). - 17.
Sox H C Rennie D, Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature. Lessons from the Poehlman case, Annals of Internal Medicine, 2006, 144, 609–613. - 18.
Wager E Kleinert S, Cooperation between research institutions and journals on reseach integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Maturitas, 2012, 72, 165–9. - 19.
Wager E, Recognition, reward and responsibility: why the authorship of scientific papers matters, Maturitas, 2008, 62, 109–12. - 20.
COPE ref. 3. - 21.
Wager E, Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship?, Medscape General Medicine, 2007, 9(3), 16. - 22.
Shao J Shen H, The outflow of academic papers from China: why is it happening and can it be stemmed?, Learned Publishing, 2011, 24, 95–7. - 23.
Fauber J, Journal editor gets royalties as articles favor devices: www.jsonline com/watchdog/watchdogreports/80036277.html (accessed: 9/5/11 ). - 24.
Lenzer J, Journal editor gets $20m in royalties and $2m in fees from device manufacturer, BMJ, 2010, 340, c495. - 25.
Marusić A Bates T Anić A Marusić M, How the structure of contribution disclosure statements affects validity of authorship: a randomized study in a general medical journal, Current Medical Research & Opinion, 2006, 22(6), 1035–44. - 26.
Zarin D A Tse T Ide N C. Trial registration at ClinicalTrials.gov between May and October 2005, New England Journal of Medicine, 2005, 335, 2779–87. - 27.
Meerpohl J J Wolff R F Antes G von Elm E, Are pediatric Open Access journals promoting good publication practice?, An analysis of author instructions, BMC Pediatrics, 2011, 11, 27. - 28.
Kunath F Grobe H R Keck B Rucker G Wullich B Antes G Meerpohl JJ, Do urology journals enforce trial registration?, A cross-sectional study of published trials, BMJ Open, 2011, 1, e000430. - 29.
CrossCheck: http://www.crossref.org/crosscheck/index.html (accessed 24 July 2012 ). - 30.
White C, Software makes it easier for journals to spot image manipulation, BMJ, 2007, 334, 607. - 31.
COPE ref. 3.