Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Scholarly Reading and the Value of Academic Library Collections: results of a study in six UK universities Cover

Scholarly Reading and the Value of Academic Library Collections: results of a study in six UK universities

Open Access
|Jul 2012

References

  1. 1.Tenopir C Volentine R, UK Scholarly Reading and the Value of Library Resources: Summary Results of the Study Conducted Spring 2011 Study on behalf of JISC Collections, 2012: http://www.jisc-collections.ac.uk/Reports/ukscholarlyreadingreport/ (accessed 24 April 2012).
  2. 2.Tenopir C King D W, Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientist, Librarians and Publishers, 2000, Washington DC, Special Libraries Association.
  3. 3.Tenopir C Wilson S Vakkari P Talja S King D W, Cross Country Comparison of Scholarly E-Reading Patterns in Australia, Finland and the United States, Australian Academic & Research Libraries (AARL), 2010, 41(1), 2641.
  4. 4.Tenopir C King D W, ref. 2.
  5. 5.King D W Tenopir C, Using and Reading Scholarly Literature. In: Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 34, Ed. Williams M, 2001, Medford, NJ, Information Today, Inc.
  6. 6.Healy L W Dagar L Wilkie K M, Custom Report Prepared for the Digital Library Federation/Council on Library and Information Resources, 2002, Burlingame, CA, Outsell.
  7. 7.Brown C M, The Role of Electronic Preprints in Chemical Communication: Analysis of Citation, Usage and Acceptance in the Journal Literature, Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 2003, 54(5), 362371.
  8. 8.Maughan P D, Library Resources and Services: A Cross-Disciplinary Survey of Faculty and Graduate Student Use and Satisfaction, Journal of Academic Librarianship, 1999, 25(5), 354366.
  9. 9.Research Information Network, The Value of Libraries for Research and Researchers, A RIN and RLUK Report, 2011.
  10. 10.Flanagan J C, The Critical Incident Technique, Psychological Bulletin, 1954, 52(4), 327358.
  11. 11.Bradford M L, The Critical Incident Technique and the Qualitative Evaluation of the Connecting Libraries and Schools Projects, Library Trends, 2006, 55(1), 4664.
  12. 12.Andrews J, The Use of the Critical Incident Research Technique in an Academic Library, Library & Information Research News, 1991, 14(50), 2227.
  13. 13.Griffiths J M King D W, A Manual on the Evaluation of Information Centers and Services: NATO, AGARD, 1991, New York, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
  14. 14.King D W Tenopir C Montgomery C H Aerni S E, Patterns of Journal Use by Faculty at Three Diverse Universities, D-Lib Magazine, 2003, 9(10): http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october03/king/10king.html (accessed 24 April 2012).
  15. 15.Research Information Network, ref. 9.
  16. 16.Luther J, University Investment in the Library: What's the Return? A Case Study at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Elsevier Library Connect White Paper, 2008: http://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/sites/default/files/lcwp0101.pdf (accessed 24 April 2012).
Language: English
Published on: Jul 5, 2012
Published by: UKSG
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2012 Carol Tenopir, Rachel Volentine, Donald W King, published by UKSG
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.