Incidental Findings: The Importance of Pretest Counseling

Kathryn M. Buchtel; Elizabeth A. Leeth

doi:10.15844/pedneurbriefs-29-12-2

Incidental Findings: The Importance of Pretest Counseling

Pediatric Neurology Briefs

Volume 29 (2015): Issue 12

By: Kathryn M. Buchtel and Elizabeth A. Leeth

Open Access

|Jan 2016

Abstract

Researchers at the University of Bourgogne in Dijon, France surveyed French geneticists who were members of the “Association Français des Généticiens” on incidental findings (IF) found on array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) technology retrospectively over a seven-year period.

References

Lefebvre M Sanlaville D Marle N Thauvin-Robinet C Gautier E El Chehadeh S Genetic counselling difficulties and ethical implications of incidental findings from array-CGH: A 7-year national survey Clin Genet 2015 Nov 19 Epub ahead of print 10.1111/cge.12696 26582393
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Green RC Berg JS Grody WW Kalia SS Korf BR Martin CL American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing Genet Med 2013 Jul 15 7 565 574 10.1038/gim.2013.73 23788249
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chambers C Jansen LA Dhamija R Review of Commercially Available Epilepsy Genetic Panels J Genet Counsel 2015 Nov 5 Epub ahead of print 10.1007/s10897-015-9906-9 26536886
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues Anticipate and Communicate Ethical Management of Incidental and Secondary Findings in the Clinical, Research, and Direct-to-Consumer Contexts 2013 Dec Washington DC Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues [cited 2016 Jan 12]. Available from: http://bioethics.gov/sites/default/files/FINALAnticipateCommunicate_PCSBI_0.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hegde M Bale S Bayrak-Toydemir P Gibson J Jeng LJ Joseph L Reporting incidental findings in genomic scale clinical sequencing—a clinical laboratory perspective: a report of the Association for Molecular Pathology J Mol Diagn 2015 Mar 17 2 107 117 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2014.10.004 25684271
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15844/pedneurbriefs-29-12-2 | Journal eISSN: 2166-6482

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 91 - 91

Submitted on: Jan 12, 2016

Accepted on: Jan 17, 2016

Published on: Jan 19, 2016

Published by: Pediatric Neurology Briefs Publishers

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Keywords:

aCGH,

ethical issues,

incidental findings

© 2016 Kathryn M. Buchtel, Elizabeth A. Leeth, published by Pediatric Neurology Briefs Publishers
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 29 (2015): Issue 12