Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessment of the Efficiency of Civil Society Organisations in Implementing the Concept of Sustainable Development Cover

Assessment of the Efficiency of Civil Society Organisations in Implementing the Concept of Sustainable Development

Open Access
|Jul 2025

References

  1. Birkentale, V., Vasylenko, V. (2021). Program-targeted approach to investment development of territories. Economics and management organization, 2, 132-141. https://doi.org/10.31558/2307-2318.2021.2.13
  2. CAF World Giving Index (2023). Charities Aid Foundation. Electronic resource. Retrieved from https://www.cafonline.org/insights/research/world-giving-index
  3. Charities Aid Foundation (CAF). World Giving Index 2023. Retrieved from: https://www.cafonline.org/insights/research/world-giving-index
  4. CSO Meter 2023: Ukraine. Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research. Electronic resource. Retrieved from https://csometer.info/countries/Ukraine
  5. CSO Sustainability Index Explorer (2023). U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Electronic resource. Retrieved from https://csosi.org/
  6. Degtyar, Ya. (2016). Program-target method in the budget process in the context of Ukraine's integration into the European Union. Financial Law, 8, 130-134.
  7. FHI 360. Civil Society Organization Sustainability Index – Project Overview. Retrieved from: https://www.fhi360.org/projects/civil-society-organization-sustainability-index-csosi/
  8. Freedom in the World 2024. Freedom House. Electronic resource. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world
  9. Glover, W., Farris, J., Van Aken, E. (2015). The relationship between continuous improvement and rapid improvement sustainability. International Journal of Production Research, 53(13), 4068-4086. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2014.991841.
  10. Green recovery of Ukraine 2023. Kyiv School of Economics. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2024-04/undp-ua-green-recovery-ukr.pdf
  11. Guba, M. (2021). Program-targeted approach as a tool for community management. Bulletin of the Kherson National Technical University, 2, 120-126. https://doi.org/10.35546/kntu2078-4481.2021.2.15
  12. Gudz, P, Skorobogata, U. (2014). Assessment of the efficiency of the activity non-commercial organizations. Academic review, 1(40), 56-63. https://acadrev.duan.edu.ua/images/PDF/2014/1/9.pdf
  13. Gushchuk, I., Topishko, N., Galetskyi, S., and Dovhunyk, O. (2024). Development and financial support of programs in the field of public health at the state and local (regional) levels: a program-targeted approach. Public Health Journal, 2, 61-69. https://doi.org/10.32782/pub.health.2024.2.7
  14. Yastremska, O., Stamatin, G. (2024). Flexible employment policy at enterprises: a program-targeted approach. Current issues in modern science, 8, 210-221. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6300-2024-8(26)-210-221
  15. Klekotko, M. (2018). Civil Society, Governance and Community Sustainable Development: A Cognitive Approach on the Example of Rural Poland. Employment and economy in Central and Eastern Europe, 7(1), 1-20.
  16. Koblianska, I., Kubatko, O., Lytvynenko, S., Yevdokymov, A., & Borukha, A. (2024). Assessment of efficiency of biodiversity mainstreaming concept implementation in Ukraine. Digital Есопоmу and Economic Security, 4 (13), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.32782/dees.13-2
  17. Kolesnyk, T., Konarivska, O., Pozniakovska, N., Mikluha, O., Yakovyshyna, M. (2023). Assessment of the impact of recreation load on the development of responsible community tourism. 2023 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ Sci, 1269. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1269/1/012013
  18. Kupich, N. (2015). Using the Delphi method of expert evaluations in decision-making tasks. Mathematical models, 2(33), 14-16.
  19. Kurtov, A., Polikashin, O., Potihenskiy, A., Alexndrov, V. (2017). Expert evaluations. the "Delphi" method as a management decision-making technology. Collection of scientific works of the Kharkiv National University of the Air Force, 1(50), 118-122.
  20. Lisnichuk, O., Medvidchuk, L. (2020). Program-target method in state budget planning. Innovative Economics, 7-8, 125-132. DOI: 10.37332/2309-1533.2020.7-8.17
  21. Malta. (2024). Community Development: Concepts and Implementation in Sustainable Development. Influence: international journal of science review, 6(1), 94-105. http://influence-journal.com/index.php/influence/article/view/216
  22. Matus, A., et al (2019). Basic study of the state and directions of development of Ukraine's environmental policy and the prospects for strengthening the participation of civil society organizations in the development and implementation of environmentally friendly policies (period 2018 - January 2019). Retrieved from https://www.irf.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/baseline-research_report_publishing-dec-2019.pdf
  23. Mensah, J., Casadevall, S. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent social sciences, 5(1), 1-21.
  24. Nations in Transit (2024). A Region Reordered by Autocracy and Democracy. Freedom House. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2024-04/NIT_2024_Digital_Booklet.pdf
  25. Niven, P. (2008). Balanced Scorecard: Step-by-Step for Government and Nonprofit Agencies. – New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2nd edition.
  26. Patyka, N., Sokolova, A., Movchaniuk, A., Sysoieva, I., & Khirivskyi, R. (2023). Ukraine’s rural areas in the conditions of decentralization and local self-government reform: challenges and prospects. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 9(3), 266–295. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2023.09.03.12
  27. Pozniakovska, N., Savina, N., Mikluha, O., Pilyavets, V. (2023). Interactions between civil society, business and government for environmental sustainability. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 1269, 012036. DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/1269/1/012036
  28. Savchuk, S. (2016). Peculiarities of strategic planning in the context of budget decentralization. Economy and Society, 7, 838-843.
  29. Sénit, C.-A. (2020). Leaving no one behind? The influence of civil society’s participation on the Sustainable Development Goals. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 38(4), 693-712.
  30. Shulika, A. (2023). Influence of civil society on the implementation of the concept of sustainable distribution. Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Philos.-Political Studies, 49, 351-356. DOI https://doi.org/10.30970/PPS.2023.49.42 Since the agricultural sector is declared among the keywords, it is recommended to supplement the review and discussion with publications on this issue, in particular:
  31. Sysoieva, I., Balaziuk, O., & Pylypenko, L. (2019). Modelling of enterprise’s accounting policy: Theoretical aspect. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5 (1), 188. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-1-188-193
  32. Sokolova, A., Ratoshniuk, T., & Маrtynyuk M. (2022). Estimation of ecological factors of sustainable rural development: regional features. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability, 6(1), 02. https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2022.06.01.02
  33. Sokolova, A., Ratoshniuk, T., Маrtynyuk M., & Ratoshniuk, V. (2023). Features and prospects of the development of the social sphere of the village under conditions of decentralization: regional aspects. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability, 7(1), 04. https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2023.07.01.04
  34. The European Green Deal. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (COM (2019) 640 final). European Environment Agency. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0640
  35. Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research (UCIPR). Civil Society Organizations Sustainability Index for Ukraine 2023–2024. Retrieved from: https://www.ucipr.org.ua/en/about-us/projects/civil-society-organisations-sustainability-index-for-Ukraine-2023-2024
  36. UNDP (2010). Results-Based Management Handbook. United Nations Development Group Results-Based Management Handbook.
  37. United States Agency for International Development (USAID) & FHI 360. Civil Society Organization Sustainability Index (CSOSI). Retrieved from: https://csosi.org/
  38. Zhiber, T. (2018). Target-based public budgeting in Ukraine. Strategy of economic development of Ukraine, 42, 138-147.
  39. Charities Aid Foundation (CAF). World Giving Index 2023 – Full Report (PDF). Retrieved from: https://www.cafonline.org/docs/default-source/updated-pdfs-for-the-new-website/world-giving-index-2023.pdf
  40. Freedom House. Freedom in the World 2023 – Complete Report (PDF). Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2024-11/FIW-2023-Complete-Book.pdf
  41. Freedom House. Freedom in the World 2023 – Ukraine Country Profile. Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/country/Ukraine/freedom-world/2023
  42. Freedom House. Nations in Transit 2023 – Full Report (PDF). Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2023-05/NIT_2023_Digital.pdf
  43. Freedom House. Nations in Transit 2023 – Ukraine Country Profile. Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/country/Ukraine/nations-transit/2023
  44. Ukrainian World Congress. Ukraine ranks second in World Giving Index. Retrieved from: https://www.ukrainianworldcongress.org/Ukraine-ranks-second-in-world-giving-index/
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2025.17 | Journal eISSN: 2345-0355 | Journal ISSN: 1822-6760
Language: English
Page range: 225 - 237
Submitted on: Apr 17, 2025
Accepted on: May 19, 2025
Published on: Jul 3, 2025
Published by: Vytautas Magnus University, Institute of Foreign Language
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Nataliia Pozniakovska, Inna Sysoieva, Olesia Mikluha, Jurgita Baranauskienė, Irina Grishchenko, Oleg Pohrishchuk, published by Vytautas Magnus University, Institute of Foreign Language
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.