Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
How Do Anti-Money Laundering Laws Affect the Growth of Fintech Lending Platforms in Europe? Cover

How Do Anti-Money Laundering Laws Affect the Growth of Fintech Lending Platforms in Europe?

By: Nicole Smith  
Open Access
|Apr 2026

References

  1. Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. P. (2016). 150 years of fintech: An evolutionary analysis. Jassa, 3, 22–29.
  2. Arnone, M., & Borlini, L. (2010). International anti‐money laundering programs. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 13(3), 226–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/13685201011057136
  3. Ayata, Z. (2024). European Union contracts in digital environments. In D. Ramiro Troitiño (Ed.), E-governance in the European Union: Strategies, tools, and implementation (pp. 173–185). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-031–56045-3_12
  4. Baba, C., Batog, C., Flores, E., Gracia, B., Karpowicz, I., Kopyrski, P., Roaf, J., Shabunina, A., van Elkan, R., & Xu, X. C. (2020). Fintech in Europe: Promises and threats [IMF Working paper no. WP/20/24]. International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513561165.001
  5. Bartnik, K. (2025). Can a national financial supervisor support the development of the fintech sector? Innovation hubs as a tool for supporting innovation: The examples of Poland, Estonia, and Italy. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 30(3), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2025.30.03.14
  6. Berg, T., Fuster, A., & Puri, M. (2021). Fintech lending [NBER Working paper no. 29421]. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w29421
  7. Brummer, C., & Yadav, Y. (2017). The fintech trilemma. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3054770
  8. Buckley, R. P., Arner, D. W., Veidt, R., & Zetzsche, D. A. (2019). Building fintech ecosystems: Regulatory sandboxes, innovation hubs and beyond. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3455872
  9. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. (2017). Entrenching innovation: The 4th UK alternative finance industry report. https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/2017–12-21-ccaf-entrenching-innov.pdf
  10. Carney, M. (2017, 25 January). The promise of fintech – something new under the sun? [Speech]
  11. Deutsche Bundesbank G20 Conference on Digitising Finance, Financial Inclusion and Financial Literacy, Wiesbaden. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/speech/2017/the-promise-of-fintech-something-new-under-the-sun
  12. Committee on the Global Financial System & Financial Stability Board. (2017). Fintech credit: Market structure, business models and financial stability implications. https://www.fsb.org/uploads/CGFS-FSB-Report-on-Fintech-Credit.pdf
  13. Cornelli, G., Frost, J., Gambacorta, L., Rau, P. R., Wardrop, R., & Ziegler, T. (2020). Fintech and big tech credit: A new database [BIS Working paper]. Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/publ/work887.htm
  14. Costa, M. I. (2023). The legal concept of discrimination by association: Where does it fit into the digital era? UNIO – EU Law Journal, 9(1), 16–28.
  15. Council of the European Communities. (1991). Council Directive 91/308/EEC of 10 June 1991 on the Prevention of the Use of the Financial System for the Purpose of Money Laundering (O. J. L 166, 28.06.1991, pp. 77–83). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:31991L0308
  16. European Banking Authority. (2025, July 28). A careless use of innovative compliance products can lead to money laundering and terrorism financing risks, the EBA says in its opinion [Press release]. https://www.eba.europa.eu/publications-and-media/press-releases/careless-use-innovative-compliance-products-can-lead-money-laundering-and-terrorism-financing-risks
  17. European Commission. (2020). Communication from the Commission on an Action Plan for a Comprehensive Union Policy on Preventing Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing 2020/C 164/06 (Document 52020XC0513(03)). C/2020/2800. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1640/oj
  18. European Institute of Innovation and Technology. (2024). Fintech innovation: A balancing act between disruption and regulation https://eit.europa.eu/library/fintech-innovation-balancing-act-between-disruption-and-regulation
  19. European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). (2018). Joint report on regulatory sandboxes and innovation hubs. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/jc_2018_74_joint_report_on_regulatory_sandboxes_and_innovation_hubs.pdf
  20. European Union. (2005). Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the Prevention of the Use of the Financial System for the Purpose of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (O. J. L 309, 26.10.2005, pp. 15–36).
  21. European Union. (2015). Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the Prevention of the Use of the Financial System for the Purposes of Money Laundering or Terrorist Financing (O. J. L 141, 20.05.2015, pp. 73–117).
  22. European Union. (2023). Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 on Information Accompanying Transfers of Funds and Certain Crypto-Assets and Amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 (O. J. L 150, 09.06.2023, pp. 1–39).
  23. European Union. (2024a). Regulation (EU) 2024/1620 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2024 Establishing the Authority for Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (O. J. L 2024, 31.05.2024, pp. 45–60).
  24. European Union. (2024b). Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2024 on the Prevention of the Use of the Financial System for the Purposes of Money Laundering or Terrorist Financing (O. J. L 2024, 31.05.2024, pp. 1–30).
  25. European Union. (2024c). Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2024 on the Mechanisms to Be Put in Place by Member States for the Prevention of the Use of the Financial System for the Purposes of Money Laundering or Terrorist Financing (O. J. L 2024, 31.05.2024, pp. 31–55).
  26. Ferretti, F. (2022). A single European data space and data act for the digital single market: On datafication and the viability of a PSD2-like access regime for the platform economy. Eur. J. Legal Stud., 14, 173. https://dx.doi.org/10.2924/EJLS.2022.015
  27. Giovanola, B. (2023). Justice, emotions, socially disruptive technologies. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 26(1), 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2021.1893255
  28. Gopal, M., & Schnabl, P. (2022). The rise of finance companies and fintech lenders in small business lending. Review of Financial Studies, 35(11), 4859–4901. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhac034
  29. Hamuľák, O. (2016). National sovereignty in the European Union: View from the Czech perspective. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-319–45351-4
  30. Kerikmäe, T.,Troitiño, D. & Shumilo, O. (2019). An Idol or an Ideal? A Case Study of Estonian E-Governance: Public Perceptions, Myths and Misbeliefs. Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum. 7. 71–80. 10.11590/abhps.2019.1.05.
  31. Koranteng, B., & You, K. (2024). Fintech and financial stability: Evidence from spatial analysis for 25 countries. Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money, 93, 102002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2024.102002
  32. Kou, G., & Lu, Y. (2025). Fintech: A literature review of emerging financial technologies and applications. Financial Innovation, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854–024-00668–6
  33. Lagarde, C. (2018). A regulatory approach to fintech. Finance & Development. https://www.omfif.org/2018/09/a-regulatory-approach-to-fintech/
  34. Langley, P., & Leyshon, A. (2020). The platform political economy of fintech: Reintermediation, consolidation and capitalisation. New Political Economy, 26(3), 376–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2020.1766432
  35. Lentini, A., Munteanu, D. E., & Zennaro, F. (2025). Fintech classification methodology (Markets, Infrastructures and Payment Systems No. 61, pp. 1–40). Banca d’Italia. https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/mercati-infrastrutture-e-sistemi-di-pagamento/approfondimenti/2025–061/N.61-MISP_ENG.pdf?language_id=1
  36. Maatsch, A. (2024). Parliamentary adjustment during a crisis: Interplay of digitalization and domestic context factors. Internet of Things, 27, 101316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101316
  37. Mazur, V., & Ramiro Troitiño, D. (2024). The members of the EU and e-governance, analysis, and institutional support. In D. Ramiro Troitiño (Ed.) E-governance in the European Union: Strategies, tools, and implementation (pp. 39–55). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-031–56045-3
  38. Mokrá, L. (2023). Digitally sovereign individuals: The right to disconnect as a new challenge for European legislation in the context of building the EU digital market. In D. Ramiro Troitiño, T. Kerikmäe, & O. Hamuľák (Eds.) Digital development of the European Union: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 189–197). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-031–27312-4_12
  39. Omotoso, O. (2024). AML in cross-border fintech transactions: Risks and regulatory measures. SSRN Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5038850
  40. Outeda, C. C. (2024). The EU’s AI Act: A framework for collaborative governance. Internet of Things 27(3), 101291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101291
  41. Rek, M. (2024). E-democracy in the EU. In D. Ramiro Troitiño (Ed.) E-governance in the European Union: Strategies, tools, and implementation (pp. 103–115). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-031–56045-3_8
  42. Roide, N. (2022). Fintech and anti-money laundering regulation: Implementing an international regulatory hierarchy premised on financial innovation. Texas A&M Law Review, 9(2), 465–496. https://doi.org/10.37419/lr.v9.i2.5
  43. Rūse, I. (2014). Nordic–Baltic interaction in European Union negotiations: Taking advantage of institutionalized cooperation. Journal of Baltic Studies, 45(2), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2013.846928
  44. Suryono, R. R., Purwandari, B., & Budi, I. (2019). Peer to peer (P2P) lending problems and potential solutions: A systematic literature review. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.116
  45. Tomczak, T. (2025). Nadzór AML nad kryptoaktywami od 30.12.2024 r. – zmiany w Dyrektywie 2015/849 wprowadzone rozporządzeniem 2023/1113. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 30(3), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2025.30.03.08
  46. Troitiño, D. R. (2023). EU elections and internet voting (i-voting). In D. Ramiro Troitiño, T. Kerikmäe, & O. Hamuľák (Eds.) Digital development of the European Union: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 319–333). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-031–27312-4_20
  47. Wang, Y. (2023). The impact of financial technology development on money laundering risks. In A. Bhunia, R. B. Ahmad, & Y. Zhu (Eds.), Advances in economics, business and management research (pp. 180–192). https://doi.org/10.2991/978–94-6463–298-9_20
  48. Wangchuk, P. (2021). Common types of crowdfunding models, related concepts and its impact on business: A brief literature review. Asian Journal of Economics Business and Accounting, 56–63. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2021/v21i1430471
  49. Wójcik, D. (2020). Financial geography I: Exploring fintech – maps and concepts. Progress in Human Geography, 45(3), 566–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520952865
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2026.31.01.13 | Journal eISSN: 2719-9452 | Journal ISSN: 1689-7404
Language: English, Polish
Page range: 229 - 243
Submitted on: Jul 22, 2025
Accepted on: Jan 8, 2026
Published on: Apr 15, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Nicole Smith, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.