References
- Balodis, R. (2021). The procedure for amending the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and the substance of restrictions established by it. Journal of the University of Latvia: Law, 14, 21–48.
- BNS. (2014, 7 November). Straujuma: Latvijā juridiski nav atrisināts jautājums par partnerattiecībām. Latvijas Sabiedriskie Mediji. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/straujuma-latvija-juridiskinav-atrisinats-jautajums-par-partnerattiecibam.a105467/
- Cabinet of Ministers. (2022, 14 December). Declaration on the action plan of the Cabinet of Ministers led by Arturs Krisjanis Karins. https://www.mk.gov.lv/lv/media/14490/download
- Cabinet of Ministers. (2023, 15 September). Declaration on the action plan of the Cabinet of Ministers led by Evika Silina. https://www.mk.gov.lv/lv/media/16704/download
- Cerna, C. M. (2010). European Court of Human Rights: Schalk & Kopf v. Austria. International Legal Materials, 49(5), 1302–1324. DOI:10.5305/intelegamate.49.5.1302
- Delfi . (2012, 1 June). TM darba kārtībā nav jautājuma par viendzimuma partnerattiecību reģistrāciju. Delfi. https://www.delfi.lv/193/politics/42402772/tm-darba-kartiba-nav-jautajuma-parviendzimuma-partnerattiecibu-registraciju
- Delfi . (2024, 2 November). Izmantojot jauno likuma regulējumu, četros mēnešos nodibinātas 277 partnerattiecības. Delfi. https://www.delfi.lv/193/politics/120048716/izmantojot-jauno-likuma-regulejumu-cetros-menesos-nodibinatas-277-partnerattiecibas
- Diversity Shop. (n.d.). Mātei Latvijai [‘Latvia loves all its children’]. https://diversityshop.org/product-category/0_9_9_8_matei_latvijai
- Eniņa, Z. (2023) Tiesnese par viendzimuma pāru attiecību atzīšanu: Tiesas ir gājušas pa priekšu likumdevējam. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/28.07.2023-tiesnese-par-viendzimumaparu-attiecibu-atzisanu-tiesas-ir-gajusas-pa-prieksu-likumdevejam.a518041/
- Eng.LSM.lv. (2022, 31 May). Court legally recognizes same-sex relationships for the fi rst time in Latvia. https://eng.lsm.lv/article/society/society/court-legally-recognizes-same-sex-relationship-forthe-first-time-in-latvia.a459319/
- Engīzers, K., & Melnika, M. (2021, 2 February). Defining the modern family: The Latvian Constitutional Court, the defi nition of ‘family’, and parliamentary bitterness. Verfassungsblog. DOI:10.17176/20210202-235854-0
- Garlicki, L. (2007). Constitutional courts versus supreme courts. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5(1), 44–68.
- Giles, J. (2016). Oliari and Others v. Italy: Application nos. 18766/11 and 36030/11: European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section): Hirvelä, Raimondi, Bianku, Tsotsoria, Mahoney, Vehabović, Grozev JJ; Mahoney, joined by Tsotsoria and Vehabović concurring: 21 July 2015. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 5(1), 176–177. DOI:10.1093/ojlr/rwv054
- Gill-Pedro, E. (2023, 27 January). No new rights in Fedotova. Verfassungsblog. DOI:10.17176/20230130-202753-0
- Hodson, L. (2011). A marriage by any other name? Schalk and Kopf v. Austria. Human Rights Law Review, 11(1), 170–179. DOI:10.1093/hrlr/ngq054
- Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 7 November 2018 on the case “On Compliance of Section 50.4 of the Sentence Execution Code of Latvia (hereinafter – the Code) establishes the regime for serving the sentence in closed prisons, inter alia, that men, who have been sentenced to the deprivation of liberty for committing a serious or a particularly serious crime, serve the sentence in a closed prison”, no. 2018-25-01. https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/web/viewer.html?file=https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/2018-25-01_Judgement.pdf
- Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 12 November 2020 on the case “On compliance of Section 155(1) of the Labour Law with the first sentence of Article 110 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia”, no. 2019-33-01. https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/web/viewer.html?file=https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/2019-33-01_Judgment.pdf
- Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 24 June 2010 on the case of Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, application no. 30141/04.
- Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 21 July 2015 on the case of Oliari and Others v. Italy, application nos. 18766/11 and 36030/11.
- Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 17 January 2023 on the case of Fedotova and Others v. Russia, applications nos. 40792/10, 30538/14 and 43439/14.
- Judgment of the Supreme Court (Senate) of 10 December 2021 on the case “The State’s Duty to Legally Recognize Families Formed by Same-Sex Couples and Acknowledge the Existence of Legal Relationships Between Family Members”, no. SKA-[B1]/2021 https://www.at.gov.lv/downloadlawfile/8243
- Legal Affairs Committee of the Saeima. (2005). Explanatory Report of the Draft Law ‘Amendment to the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia’. https://www.saeima.lv/Lapas/8Sae_Lprj/lasadd=LP1400_0.htm
- Legal Affairs Committee of the Saeima. (2015). Minutes of Sitting no. 35 of 24 February 2015. https://titania.saeima.lv/livs/saeimasnotikumi.nsf/0/860b9e221fc9de81c2257df100391469/$FILE/PR_24_02_2015_10_00_JK.doc
- Legal Affairs Committee of the Saeima. (2021). Minutes of Sitting no. 169 of 19 January 2021. https://titania.Parliament.lv/livs/Parliamentsnotikumi.nsf/0/b96c87ffadfb7a12c225865c004d8464/$FILE/PR_2021_01_19_10_00_JK.pdf
- Lipša, I. (2017). LGBTI vēsture Latvijā pēdējos 100 gados. Dardedze hologrāfija.
- LSM. (2018, 7 March). Saeimas Komisijas Zoraida Kopdzīves likuma iniciatīvu. Latvijas Sabiedriskie Mediji. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/saeimas-komisija-noraida-kopdzives-likumainiciativu.a270507/
- LSM. (2022, 31 March). Saeimā sāk skatīt Civilās savienības likumu viendzimuma pāru ģimeņu aizsardzībai. Latvijas Sabiedriskie Mediji. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/saeima-sakskatit-civilas-savienibas-likumu-viendzimuma-paru-gimenu-aizsardzibai.a450431/
- LSM. (2024, 11 January). CVK oficiāli apstiprina – referenduma par partnerības regulējumu nebūs. Latvijas Sabiedriskie Mediji. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/11.01.2024-cvk-oficialiapstiprina-referenduma-par-partneribas-regulejumu-nebus.a538599/
- LSM. (2024, 1 July). Stājas spēkā Partnerības regulējums; pirmais viendzimuma pāris reģistrē attiecības. Latvijas Sabiedriskie Mediji. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/01.07.2024-stajas-spekapartneribas-regulejums-pirmais-viendzimuma-paris-registre-attiecibas.a559690/
- LSM. (2024, 1 August). Mēneša laikā partnerību noslēguši 95 pāri. Latvijas Sabiedriskie Mediji. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/01.08.2024-menesa-laika-partneribu-noslegusi-95-pari.a563521/
- manabalss.lv. (2015, 23 March). Par kopdzīves likuma pieņemšanu latvijā. https://manabalss.lv/par-kopdzives-likuma-pienemsanu-latvija/show
- Mandates, Ethics and Submissions Committee of the Saeima. (2018). Minutes of Sitting no. 127 of 31 January 2018. https://titania.saeima.lv/livs/saeimasnotikumi.nsf/0/9d1c971e95fc349ac22582240027420c/$FILE/Nr.127_PR_2018_31_01_1200_MEIK.doc
- Marzano, V. J. (2017). Oliari and the European Court of Human Rights: Where the court failed. Pace International Law Review, 29(1), 250–287. DOI:10.58948/2331-3536.1370
- Tieslietu ministrija. (2023, 26 October). Par likumprojektu iesniegšanu. https://www.tm.gov.lv/sites/tm/files/media_file/tm_pavadvestule_261023.pdf
- Mita, D. (2024). Cieņa pret atšķirīgo. In Senatore Dace Mita (p. 31). Augstākā tiesa.
- Monciunskaite, B. (2022). The risks to judicial independence in Latvia: A view eighteen years since EU accession. Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 18, 129–149.
- Mos, M. (2020). The anticipatory politics of homophobia: Explaining constitutional bans on same-sex marriage in post-communist Europe. East European Politics, 36(3), 395–416. DOI:10.1080/215 99165.2020.1733983
- Mozaīka. (2021, 11 December). Viendzimuma partner ģimenes atzīšana tiesas ceļā. https://www.mozaika.lv/l/mozaika-nodrosinas-atbalstu-tiesa-atzit-viendzimuma-partneru-gimenes-pastavesanasfaktu/
- Ombudsman. (2018). Report of 29 October 2018 ‘On the Recognition of Different Forms of Families’. https://www.tiesibsargs.lv/wp-content/uploads/migrate_2022/content/atzinumi/atzinums_lieta_nr_2018_38_26g_1541406373.pdf
- Palazzo, N. (2023). Fedotova and Others v. Russia: Dawn of a new era for European LGBTQ families? Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 30(2), 216–228. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4612696
- Plepa, D. (2024). Satversmīga kopdzīve jeb radniecības un ģimenes tiesību tvērums Latvijas likumkopā. In K. Sedlenieka (Ed.), Radniecība un valsts īstenošana mūsdienu Latvijā (pp. 147–178). Rīgas Stradiņa Universitāte.
- Pleps, J., Pastars, E., & Plakane, I. (2022). Constitutional law. Latvijas Vēstnesis. https://juristavards.lv/wwwraksti/JV/BIBLIOTEKA/GRAMATAS/KT_ENG.PDF
- Polgári, E. (2022). Fedotova v. Russ (Eur. Ct. H. R.). International Legal Materials, 61(3), 438–452. DOI:10.1017/ilm.2021.55
- Prime Minister of Latvia. (2022, 21 March). On the submission of a draft law. https://titania.Parliament.lv/LIVS13/Parliamentlivs13.nsf/0/84487ED0DCD7420CC225880C00497AA4?OpenDocument
- Pustorino, P. (2014). Same-sex couples before the ECtHR: The right to marriage. In D. Gallo, L. Paladini, & P. Pustorino (Eds.), Same-sex couples before national, supranational and international jurisdictions (pp. 399–408). Springer. DOI:10.1007/978-973-642-35434-2_17
- Republic of Latvia. (1922). The Constitution of the Republic of Latvia. https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/57980-the-constitution-of-the-republic-of-latvia
- Republic of Latvia. (1996). The Constitutional Court Law of the Republic of Latvia. https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/63354-constitutional-court-law
- Republic of Latvia. (2001). Labour Law of 20 June 2001 (consolidated text of 2022, article 155, as amended). https://likumi.lv/ta/id/26019-darba-likums
- Republic of Latvia. (2023a). Amendments of 9 November 2023 to the Notariate Law. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/349238-grozijumi-notariata-likuma
- Republic of Latvia. (2023b). Amendments of 9 November 2023 to the Register of Natural Persons Law. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/347527-grozijumi-fizisko-personu-registra-likuma
- Rezevska, D. (2024). General principles of law: Natural rights, legal methods and system principles. Brill/Nijhoff.
- Rodiņa, A., & Spale, A. (2012). Constitutional status of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Конституционное Правосудие [Constitutional Justice], 4, 36–80. https://www.concourt.am/pdf/uploads/62c81a405baba_4(58)%202012.pdf
- Saeima of Latvia. (2005). Transcript of the Plenary Session of 5 December 2005. https://saeima.lv/Likumdosana/8S_DK/lasdk-dd=20051215.htm
- Saeima of Latvia. (2018a). Agenda of the Sitting of the Mandates, Ethics, and Submissions Committee of the Saeima of 31 January 2018. https://titania.saeima.lv/livs/saeimasnotikumi.nsf/0/9D1C971E95FC349AC22582240027420C
- Saeima of Latvia. (2018b). Transcript of the Plenary Session of 15 March 2018. https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS12/saeimalivs_lmp.nsf/0/24EEC09C320F58B1C2258267003FBD0F
- Saeima of Latvia. (2019). Transcript of the Plenary Session of 20 June 2019. https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS13/saeimalivs13.nsf/0/3B2A66723AFECB61C225885300358630
- Saeima of Latvia. (2020). Transcript of the Plenary Session of 29 October 2020. https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS13/saeimalivs_lmp.nsf/0/A892369C38C20F3DC22586230049F9A1
- Saeima of Latvia. (2022a). Transcript of Plenary Session of 26 May 2022. https://titania.Parliament.lv/LIVS13/Parliamentlivs13.nsf/0/15D9FED46F96EA50C2258869002F1DFE?OpenDocument
- Saeima of Latvia. (2022b). Transcript of Plenary Session of 15 December 2022. https://titania.Parliament.lv/LIVS14/Parliamentlivs14.nsf/0/A92703427893BD8EC22589210038EC20?OpenDocument
- Saeima of Latvia. (2023, 10 November). Saeima: Two adults will be able to enter into a partnership to be registered by a notary. https://www.Parliament.lv/en/news/Parliament-news/32825-Parliament-two-adults-will-be-able-to-enter-into-a-partnership-to-be-registered-by-a-notary
- Spolītis, V. (2015, 30 January). On proposals for draft law ‘Amendments to the Civil Code’. https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS12/SaeimaLIVS12.nsf/0/AE031B89B11B728AC2257DDD004EA58E
- Tiesībsargs. (2018a). 21. gadsimta ģimenei nepieciešams atbilstošs juridisks ietvars. https://www.tiesibsargs.lv/news/21-gadsimta-gimenei-nepieciesams-atbilstoss-juridisks-ietvars/
- Tiesībsargs. (2018b). Par dažādu ģimenes formu atzīšanu. Atzinums pārbaudes lietā Nr.2018-38-26G. https://www.tiesibsargs.lv/wp-content/uploads/migrate_2022/content/atzinumi/atzinums_lieta_nr_2018_38_26g_1541406373.pdf
- Trabucco, F. R. (2020). The Latvian direct democracy tools in a comparative European context. Onati Socio-Legal Series, 10(4), 744–788. DOI:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1075
- The Baltic Times (2022). 26 LGBT couples ask court to recognize their relationships as de facto families. https://www.baltictimes.com/26_lgbt_couples_ask_court_to_recognize_their_relationships_as_de_facto_families/
- Viens pret vienu (2020). Tiesnese Osipova: Patiesa vienlīdzība ir iespējama vien tad, ja ir iecietība. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/tiesnese-osipova-patiesa-vienlidziba-ir-iespejama-vientad-ja-ir-iecietiba.a384401/
- Vikarská, Z. (2023, 24 January). The many troubles of the Fedotova judgment. Verfassungsblog. https://verfassungsblog.de/the-many-troubles-of-the-fedotova-judgment/. DOI:10.17176/20230124-215932-0
- Višņakova, G. (2024). Atmiņas. In Senatore Dace Mita (p. 208). Augstākā tiesa.
- Zālītis, K. (2023). Nepieciešams cieņpilns partnerattiecību regulējums, lai izvairītos no tiesvedībām. https://ir.lv/2023/10/23/nepieciesams-cienpilns-partnerattiecibu-regulejums-lai-izvairitos-notiesvedibam/