References
- Allen, M., & Edwards, I. (2019). Criminal law (15th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association Publishing.
- Bijlsma, J. (2011). Drank, drugs en culpa. Zelfintoxicatie en culpa in causa: pleidooi voor een voorzienbaarheidseis. Delikt en Delinkwent, ., 654–678.
- Bijlsma, J. (2016). Stoornis en strafuitsluiting: Op zoek naar een toetsingskader voor ontoerekenbaarheid. Wolf Legal Publishers.
- Bijlsma, J., Ligthart, S., & Nauta, E. (2022). Gaat de Hoge Raad klare wijn schenken over ontoerekenbaarheid? Twee vragen naar aanleiding van de zaak tegen Thijs H. in rechtsvergelijkend perspectief. Nederlands Juristenblad, 1135, 1466–1472.
- Browning, J., & Goldberg, A. E. (2024). Criminal responsibility in addiction [manuscript submitted for publication]. Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge and University of Groningen.
- Campbell, W. G. (2003). Addiction: A disease of volition caused by a cognitive impairment. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48(10), 669–674.
- Child, J. J. (2016). Prior fault: Blocking defences or constructing crimes. In A. Reed & M. Bohlander (Eds.), General defences in criminal law (pp. 37–50). Routledge.
- Child, J. J., Crombag, H. S., & Sullivan, G. R. (2020). Defending the delusional, the irrational, and the dangerous. Criminal Law Review, ., 306–324.
- Claessen, J., & de Vocht, D. (2012). Straf naar de mate van schuld? Delikt en Delinkwent, 42(7), 652–674.
- Crisp, A. H., Gelder, M. G., Rix, S., Meltzer, H. I., & Rowlands, O. J. (2000). Stigmatisation of people with mental illnesses. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177(1), 4–7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.177.1.4
- De Hullu, J. (2018). Materieel strafrecht: over algemene leerstukken van strafrechtelijke aansprakelijkheid naar Nederlands recht (7th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
- Faulkner, N. (2012). The criminal code: Kodeks karny. C. H. Beck.
- Goldberg, A. E. (2020). The (in)significance of the addiction debate. Neuroethics, 13(3), 311–324. doi: 10.1007/s12152–019-09424–5
- Goldberg, A. E. (2022). Blaming the addicted brain: Building bridges between criminal law and neuroscientific perspectives on addiction. Eleven International Publishing.
- Goldberg, A. E., Child, J. J., Crombag, H. S., & Roef, D. (2021). Prior-fault blame in England and Wales, Germany and the Netherlands. Journal of International & Comparative Law, ., 53–86.
- Goldberg, A. E., Altena, A., Beute, W., Buderman, C., Jongen, S., Oldenburger, A., Staring, M., Wierenga, E., & van der Wolf, M. (2024). Verslaafd en verantwoordelijk? Complexe culpa in causa kwesties in rapportage pro Justitia en jurisprudentie. Delikt & Delinkwent, 10(58).
- Goldstein, R. Z., & Volkow, N. D. (2011). Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: Neuroimaging findings and clinical implications. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12(11), 652–669. doi: 10.1038/nrn3119
- Golonka, A. D. (2021). Alcohol-related crime or no crime because of the perpetrator’s (factual) insanity? Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 11(6(S)), S146–S163.
- Grund, J. P. C., & Breeksema, J. J. (2017). Drug policy in the Netherlands. In R. Colson & H. Bergeron (Eds.), European drug policies (pp. 128–148). Routledge.
- Hall, W., & Degenhardt, L. (2008). Cannabis use and the risk of developing a psychotic disorder. World Psychiatry, .(2), 68–71. doi: 10.1002/j.2051–5545.2008.tb00158.x
- Heitzman, J., & Markiewicz, I. (2012). Niepoczytalność – doktryna, praktyka, skuteczność, alternatywa. Psychiatria Po Dyplomie, .(3), 1–6.
- Heyman, G. M. (2009). Addiction: A disorder of choice. Harvard University Press.
- Holma, K., Koski-Jännes, A., Raitasalo, K., Blomqvist, J., Pervova, I., & Cunningham, J. A. (2011). Perceptions of addictions as societal problems in Canada, Sweden, Finland and St. Petersburg, Russia. European Addiction Research, 17(2), 106–112. doi: 10.1159/000323278
- Hörnle, T. (1999). Das antiquierte Schuldverständnis der traditionellen Strafzumessungsrechtsprechung und lehre, JuristenZeitung, 54, 1080–1089.
- Jansen, R. (2020). Drie modellen voor eigen schuld bij strafuitsluitingsgronden. Boom Strafblad, ., 209–218.
- Jellinek. (n.d.). Cannabis, wiet en hasj: cijfers. Hoeveel mensen blowen? https://www.jellinek.nl/informatie-over-alcohol-drugs/drugs/cannabis-wiet-hasj/cijfers/
- Jentsch, J. D., Ashenhurst, J. R., Cervantes, M. C., Groman, S. M., James, A. S., & Pennington, Z. T. (2014). Dissecting impulsivity and its relationships to drug addictions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1327, 1–26. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12388
- Judgement of the Court of Appeal in ’s-Hertogenbosch of 29 February 2016, file ref. ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2016:704.
- Judgement of the Court of First Instance in Amsterdam of 26 April 2023, file ref. ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2023:2762.
- Judgement of the Supreme Court of the Netherlands of 9 June 1981, file ref. ECLI:NL:HR:1981:AC090.
- Judgement of the Supreme Court of the Netherlands of 12 February 2008(a), file ref. ECLI:NL:HR:2008:BC3797.
- Judgement of the Supreme Court of the Netherlands of 9 December 2008(b), file ref. ECLI:NL:HR:2008:BD2775.
- Judgement of the Supreme Court of the Netherlands of 17 October 2023, file ref. ECLI:NL:HR:2023:1295.
- Leshner, A. I. (1997). Addiction is a brain disease, and it matters. Science, 278(5335), 45–47. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5335.45
- Lindenberg, K., & Wolswijk, H. (2021). Het materiële strafrecht. Wolters Kluwer.
- Mebius, L., Prinsen, M., Kempes, M., & van der Wolf, M. (2023). Maar hoe verminderd toerekeningsvatbaar bent u dan precies? Een empirische en juridische studie van de mogelijkheid om de’verminderde toerekeningsvatbaarheid nader te preciseren. Boom Strafblad, ., 216–225.
- Meynen, G. (2016). Legal insanity: Explorations in psychiatry, law, and ethics. Springer.
- Meynen, G. (2022). Legal insanity in the Netherlands: Regulations and reflections. In R. Mackay & W. Brookbanks (Eds.), The insanity defence: International and comparative perspectives (pp. 274–294). Oxford University Press.
- Moore, T. H., Zammit, S., & Lingford-Hughes, A. (2007). Cannabis use and risk of psychotic or affective mental health outcomes: A systematic review. Lancet, 370, 319–328. doi: 10.1016/S0140–6736(07)61162–3
- Nauta, E., Ligthart, S., & Meynen, G. (2024). Stoornis en ontoerekenbaarheid: Het arrest van de Hoge Raad in de zaak Thijs H. Nederlands Juristenblad, ., 6–12.
- Pescosolido, B. A., Monahan, J., Link, B. G., Stueve, A., & Kikuzawa, S. (1999). The public’s view of the competence, dangerousness, and need for legal coercion of persons with mental health problems. American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1339–1345. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1339
- Pickard, H. (2012). The purpose in chronic addiction. American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience, .(2), 40–49. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2012.663058
- Room, R., Rehm, J., Trotter, R. T., Paglia, A., & Üstün, T. B. (2001). Cross-cultural views on stigma, valuation, parity and societal values towards disability. In T. B. Üstün, S. Chatterji, J. E. Bickenbach, R. T. Trotter, R. Room, J. Rehm, & S. Saxena (Eds.), Disability and culture: Universalism and diversity (pp. 247–291). Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
- Sattler, S., Escande, A., Racine, E., & Göritz, A. S. (2017). Public stigma toward people with drug addiction: A factorial survey. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 78(3), 415–425. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.415
- Sjöberg, L., & Olsson, G. (1981). Volitional problems in carrying through a difficult decision: The case of drug addiction. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, .(2), 177–191.
- Smith, J. L., Mattick, R. P., Jamadar, S. D., & Iredale, J. M. (2014). Deficits in behavioural inhibition in substance abuse and addiction: A meta-analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 145, 1–33. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.08.009
- Van Boekel, L. C., Brouwers, E. P. M., van Weeghel, J., & Garretsen, H. F. L (2013). Public opinion on imposing restrictions to people with an alcohol or drug addiction: A cross-sectional survey. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 48(12), 2007–2016. doi: 10.1007/s00127–013-0704–0700
- Van Netburg, C. J. (1994). Eigen schuld!? ‘Culpa in causa’ bij wettelijke strafuitsluitingsgronden. WODC.