References
- Andriychuk, O. (2017). The normative foundations of European competition law: Assessing the goals of antitrust through the lens of legal philosophy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Ankersmit, L. (2015, 3 March). Albany revisited: The Court directs NCA to carry a more social tune. European Law Blog. http://europeanlawblog.eu/?p=2695
- Buendia Esteban, R. M. (2022). Examining recent initiatives to ensure labour rights for platform workers in the European Union to tackle the problem of domination. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 28(4), 475–487.
- Cauffman, C. (2022). Towards better working conditions for persons performing services through digital labour platforms (Editorial). Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 29(1), 3–8.
- Cengiz, F. (2021). The conflict between market competition and worker solidarity: Moving from consumer to a citizen welfare standard in competition law. Legal Studies, 41, 73–90.
- Daskalova, V. (2017). Regulating the new self-employed in the Uber economy: What role for EU competition law? [TILEC discussion paper, 2017–028]. Tilburg Law and Economics Center.
- Daskalova, V. (2022, 7 October). Rethinking collective bargaining for the self-employed: European Commission publishes guidelines on exemption and non-enforcement. https://competitionlaw-blog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/2022/10/07/rethinking-collective-bargaining-for-the-self-employed-european-commission-publishes-guidelines-on-exemption-and-non-enforcement/
- Duggan, J., McDonnell, A., Sherman, U., & Carbery, R. (2021). Work in the gig economy: A research overview. Routledge.
- European Commission. (2021a). Communication from the Commission – Approval of the content of a draft for a communication from the Commission guidelines on the application of EU competition law to collective agreements regarding the working conditions of solo self-employed persons, C(2021) 8838 final.
- European Commission. (2021b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Better working conditions for a stronger social Europe: harnessing the full benefits of digitalisation for the future of work, COM(2021) 761 final.
- European Commission. (2021c). Draft Guidelines on collective bargaining of self-employed. Feedback from BDA, the Confederation of German Employers’ Associations. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12483-Collective-bargaining-agreements-for-self-employed-scope-of-application-EU-competition-rules/F1630084_en
- European Commission. (2021d). Proposal for Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving working conditions in platform work, COM(2021) 762 final 2021/0414 (COD).
- European Commission. (2021e). Response from Danish Artist Unions, Copenhagen. Draft guidelines on collective bargaining of self-employed. https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/public-consultations/2021-collective-bargaining-2_en.
- European Commission. (2022). Guidelines on the application of EU competition law to collective agreements regarding the working conditions of solo self-employed persons (O. J. 374, 30.09.2022).
- European Parliament. (2017, 15 June). Resolution on a European Agenda for the Collaborative Economy (2017/2003(INI)) (O. J. C 331, 18.09.2018).
- Frenz, W. (2016). Handbook of EU competition law. Springer.
- Gerard, D. (2018). Fairness in EU competition policy: Significance and implications. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 9(4), 211–212.
- Giedrewicz-Niewińska, A. & Kurzynoga, M. (2023). Zakres podmiotowy prawa do rokowań zbiorowych w Konstytucji RP a prawo międzynarodowe i unijne. Praca i Zabezpieczenie Społeczne, 3, 10–21.
- Giovannone, M. (2022). La contrattazione collettiva dei lavoratori autonomi nell’orizzonte UE: tra tutela della concorrenza e autotutela collettiva. Federalismi.it. Rivista di Diritto Pubblico Italiano, Comparato, Europeo, 34, 209–230.
- Ichino, P. (2001). Collective bargaining and antitrust laws: An open issue. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 17(2), 185–198.
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 23 April 1991 on the case of Klaus Höfner and Fritz Elser v. Macrotron GmbH, C-41/90, EU:C:1991:161.
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21 September 1999 on the case of Albany International BV v. Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds Textielindustrie, C-67/96, EU:C:1999:430.
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21 September 1999 on the case of Brentjens’ Handelsonderneming BV v. Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds voor de Handel in Bouwmaterialen, C-115/97 to C-117/97, EU:C:1999:434.
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21 September 1999 on the case of Maatschappij Drijvende Bokken BV v. Stichting Pensioenfonds voor de Vervoer – en Havenbedrijven, C-219/97, EU:C:1999:437.
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 12 September 2000 on the case of Pavel Pavlov and Others v. Stichting Pensioenfonds Medische Specialiste, C-180/98 to C-184/98, EU:C:2000:428.
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21 September 2000 on the case of Hendrik van der Woude v. Stichting Beatrixoord, C-222/98, EU:C:2000:475.
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 13 December 2012 on the case of Expedia Inc., C-226/11, EU:C:2012:795.
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 4 December 2014 on the case of FNV Kunsten Informatie en Media v. Staat der Nederlanden, C-413/13, EU:C:2014:2411.
- Khan, L. (2018). The New Brandeis movement: America’s antimonopoly debate. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 9(3), 131–132.
- Koutsimpogiorgos, N., van Slageren, J., Herrmann, A. M., & Frenken, K. (2020). Conceptualizing the gig economy and its regulatory problems. Policy & Internet, 12(4), 525–545.
- McDonald, A. & Miller, W. T. (2011). The interplay between regulation, antitrust and other public policy. Global Competition Reviews: The Antitrust Review of the Americas. https://globalcompetition-review.com/review/the-antitrust-review-of-the-americas/the-antitrust-review-of-the-americas-2011/download
- Mella Méndez, L. & Kurzynoga, M. (2023). The presumption of the employment relationship of platform workers as an opportunity to eliminate obstacles arising from competition law in the conclusion of a collective agreement: The example of Spain. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 28(4), 197–216.
- Monti, G. (2021). Collective labour agreements and EU competition law: Five reconfigurations. European Competition Journal, 17(3), 714–744.
- OECD. (2020). The future of work: Expert meeting on collective bargaining for own-account workers. Summary report. https://www.oecd.org/els/emp/Summary_Expert_Meetig_CB.pdf
- Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 6 September 2012, Case C-226/11, Expedia Inc., EU:C:2012:544.
- Opinion of Advocate General Wahl delivered on 11 September 2014, Case C-413/13, FNV Kunsten, EU:C:2014:2215.
- Orlanski, L. T. (2011). Searching for the basis of international convergence in competition law and policy. Global Antitrust Review, 7–47.
- Pennings, F. J. L. (2015). Exceptie van de mededingingsbepalingen voor (schijn)zelfstandigen: de zaak FNV Kiem. Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht, 21(4), 39–44.
- Pennings, F. & Bekker, S. (2023). The increasing room for collective bargaining on behalf of self-employed persons. Utrecht Law Review, 19(3), 8–24.
- Rainone, S. (2022). Labour rights beyond employment status: Insights from the competition law guidelines on collective bargaining (pre-print). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4078079
- Ranaraja, S. (2022). Trade union responses to organizing workers on digital labour platforms: A six-country study. International Journal of Labour Research, 11(1–2), 60–89.
- Rosin, A. (2022). Towards a European employment status: The EU proposal for a directive on improving working conditions in platform work. Industrial Law Journal, 51(2), 478–493.
- Schiek, D. & Gideon, A. (2018). Outsmarting the gig-economy through collective bargaining: EU competition law as a barrier to smart cities? International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 32(2–3), 275–294 https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3020100/1/Schiek%20and%20Gideon%20(2018%20-%20author%20accepted%20manuscript)%20Outsmarting%20the%20gig%20economy.pdf
- Schmidt-Kessen, M. J., Bergqvist, C., Jacqueson C., Lind, Y., & Huffman, M. (2020). ‘I’ll call my union’, said the driver: Collective bargaining of gig workers under EU competition rules. Copenhagen Business School Law Research Paper Series, 20.
- Schömann, I. (2022). Collective bargaining and the limits of competition law. ETUI Policy Brief 1.
- Stojković Zlatanović, S. & Ostojić, I. (2021). Labour law status of platform workers: Between autonomy and subordination. Regional Labour Review, 269–281.
- Unterschütz, J. (2020). Collective bargaining for platform workers: A hope for new developments? Hungarian Labour Law e-Journal, 2, 80–94.
- Vestager, M. (2022). Fairness and competition policy, SPEECH/22/6067, Prague, 22 October 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_22_6067