References
- Adams-Prassl, J., Binns, R., & Kelly-Lyth, A. (2023). Directly discriminatory algorithms. Modern Law Review, 6, 144–175.
- Adams-Prassl, J., Laulom, S., & Maneiro Vázquez, Y. (2022). The role of national courts in protecting platform workers: A comparative analysis. In J. M. Boto and E. Brameshuber (Eds.), Collective bargaining and the gig economy: A traditional tool for new business models (pp. 75–97). Hart Publishing.
- Barthès, I. & Velicu, P. (2023, 3 July). AI at the workplace: Collective bargaining needed to ensure worker involvement. The Future of Work. https://republic.gr/futureofwork/techniti-noimosyni-ston-choro-ergasias-anagki-syllogikon-diapragmateyseon-gia-ti-diasfalisi-tis-symmetochis-ton-ergazomenon/
- Boto, J. M. (2022). Collective bargaining and the gig economy: Reality and possibilities. In J. M. Boto and E. Brameshuber (Eds.), Collective bargaining and the gig economy: A traditional tool for new business models (pp. 3–18). Hart Publishing.
- Biasi, M. (2018) We will all laugh at gilded butterflies. The shadow of antitrust law on the collective negotiation of fair fees for self-employed workers. European Labour Law Journal 9(4), 354–373.
- Brockmann, J. (2022). Voluntary Commitments as Alternative Instruments for Standard-setting? The Example of the German ‘Code of Conduct – Paid Crowdsourcing for the Better’. In J. M. Boto and E. Brameshuber (Eds.), Collective bargaining and the gig economy: A traditional tool for new business models (pp. 117–132). Hart Publishing.
- Council of the European Union. (2023, 7 June). Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving working conditions in platform work, COM (2021) 762 final. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-10107–2023-INIT/en/pdf
- Davidov, G. (2016). A purposive approach to labour law. Oxford University Press.
- Directive (EU) 2022/2041 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on adequate minimum wages in the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32022L2041
- De Stefano, V. (2019). ‘Negotiating the algorithm’: Automation, artificial intelligence and labour protection. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 41(1), 1–32.
- Deskalova, V. (2021). The competition law framework and collective bargaining agreements for self-employed: Analysing restrictions and mapping exemption opportunities. In B. Waas and Ch. Hießl (Eds.), Collective bargaining for self-employed workers in Europe (pp. 19–51). Wolters Kluwer.
- High Court Den Haag 9 July 2013, (FN V Kunsten). ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2013:5381.
- High Court Den Haag 1 September 2015, (FN V Kunsten). ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2015:2305.
- European Commission. (2022). Guidelines on the application of Union competition law to collective agreements regarding the working conditions of solo self-employed persons, 2022/C 374/02.
- European Framework Agreement. (2020, June). European social partners framework agreement on digitalisation. https://www.etuc.org/system/files/document/file2020–06/Final%2022%2006%2020_Agreement%20on%20Digitalisation%202020.pdf
- European Council. (2023). EU rules on platform work. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/platform-work-eu/
- European pillar of social rights. (2017). https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/ce37482a-d0ca-11e7-a7df-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-62666461
- European Parliament resolution of 21 January 2021 with recommendations to the Commission on the right to disconnect (2019/2181(INL)). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9–2021-0021_EN.pdf
- Gyulavári, T. (2020). Collective rights of platform workers: The role of EU law. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 27(4), 406–424.
- Gyulavári, T. & Kártyás, G. (2022). Why collective bargaining is a ‘must’ for platform workers and how to achieve it. In J. M. Boto and E. Brameshuber (Eds.), Collective bargaining and the gig economy: A traditional tool for new business models (pp. 99–116). Hart Publishing.
- International Labour Organisation. (2022). Social dialogue report 2022: Collective bargaining for an inclusive, sustainable and resilient recovery. International Labour Organisation.
- Jaspers, T., Pennings F. and Peters S. (eds.) (2024). European Labour Law, Intersentia.
- Klengel, E. & Wenckebach, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence, work, power imbalance and democracy – why co-determination is essential. Italian Labour Law e-Journal, 14(2), 157–171.
- Krämer, C. & Cazes, S. (2022). Shaping the transition: Artificial intelligence and social dialogue, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 279, OECD Publishing.
- Lamannis M. (2023). Collective bargaining in the platform economy: a mapping exercise of existing initiatives, European Trade Union Institute.
- Lane, M., Williams, M., & Broecke, S. (2023). The impact of AI on the workplace: Main findings from the OECD AI surveys of employers and workers [OECD social, employment and migration working papers 288]. OECD Publishing.
- Langille, B. (2011). Labour law’s theory of justice. In G. Davidov & B. Langille (Eds.), The idea of labour law (pp. 101–119). Oxford University Press.
- Laulom, S. (2018). From decentralisation of collective bargaining to de-collectivisation of industrial relations systems? In S. Laulom (Ed.), Collective bargaining developments in times of crisis: Bulletin of comparative labour relations (pp. 15–28). Wolters Kluwer.
- Pérez del Prado, D. (n.d.) The legal framework of platform work in Spain: The new Spanish ‘riders’ law’. Retrieved 25 September 2023, from https://cllpj.law.illinois.edu/content/dispatches/2021/Dispatch-No.-36.pdf
- Ponce del Castillo, A. (2020). Labour in the age of AI: Why regulation is needed to protect workers. European Trade Union Institute. https://www.etui.org/sites/default/files/ForesightBriefs2020.pdf
- Prassl, J. (2018). Humans as a service: The promise and perils of work in the gig economy. Oxford University Press.
- Ratti, L. (2022). A long road towards the regulation of platform work in the EU. In J. M. Boto and E. Brameshuber (Eds.), Collective bargaining and the gig economy: A traditional tool for new business models (pp. 39–59). Hart Publishing.
- Roşioru, F. (2022). The ‘smart’ trade union: New strategies for a digitalised labour market. In J. M. Boto and E. Brameshuber (Eds.) Collective bargaining and the gig economy: A traditional tool for new business models (pp. 135–152). Hart Publishing.
- Rotila, V. (2019). The future of social dialogue in the age of artificial intelligence. Postmodern Openings, 10(3), 151–189.
- Salvi del Pero, A., Wyckoff, P., & Vourc’h, A. (2022). Using artificial intelligence in the workplace: What are the main ethical risks? [OECD social, employment and migration working papers 273]. OECD Publishing.
- Supreme Court Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, 19 February 2021, (Uber BV v Aslam). UKSC 5 (75).
- Supreme Court The Netherlands 24 March 2023, (Deliveroo). ECLI:NL:HR:2023:443.
- Unterschütz, J. (2019), Digital work – real bargaining: how can the sustainability of social dialogue be ensured in the digital era? In: J. Kenner, I. Florczak, M. Otto (eds.), Precarious Work. The Challenge for Labour Law in Europe (pp. 222–241). Edward Elgar.
- Voss, E. Bertossa, D. (2022) Collective Bargaining and Digitalization: A Global Survey of Union Use of Collective Bargaining to Increase Worker Control over Digitalization. New England Journal of Public Policy, 34(1), Article 10, 1–35.
- Voss, E., Riede, H. (2018), Digitalisation and workers participation: what trade unions, company level workers and online platform workers in Europe think, European Trade Union Institute.